I have another question. I am well aware that some countries are located in areas where conditions are not very conducive to farming. It was so in the past centuries, it was so 50-30 years ago. But today there are a lot of technologies and "living examples" when countries actually have no fertile land, but produce a lot of crops.
There is one more remark, from personal practice, and it is not very pleasant. I used to travel the world often and a lot, and of course I visited Africa. In several countries I had contact with people, businessmen. I asked a question - why do your countries do not attract investments for the development of the agricultural sector, although many African countries have the potential for this, but we constantly hear from them about the shortcomings of food. The answer was very unpleasant - corruption, at the highest levels of government, who live off the help of various international organizations and funds. And it is not profitable for these governments to solve the issue of agriculture, because then huge funds will stop coming in, which can be put "in their pockets". And on the other hand - international organizations, which are also not interested in the "drying up of money flows" for the same reason - corruption and the possibility of enrichment. The result is a vicious circle, where there is a small group of people who profit from the misery of the population, and a huge number of people who suffer because they create the necessary picture of hunger, and influence the allocation of new and new huge sums of money for PROEDIT, instead of investment and building self-sufficient sectors of the economy.