follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Author Topic: ETH Dev Suggests Moving to ‘ASIC-Friendly Algorithm’ After ProgPoW Decision  (Read 1579 times)

Offline PRIBO247

  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Activity: 1071
  • points:
    900
  • Karma: 6
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 3
  • Last Active: April 09, 2019, 01:08:13 PM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 21
    Badges: (View All)
    10 Posts First Post Sixth year Anniversary
An Ethereum (ETH) code contributor has suggested that Ethereum
developers ‘embrace’ specialized mining hardware (ASICs) in a
reply on Ethereum developer forum Ethereum Magicians, Jan. 7.

As Cointelegraph reported last week, Ethereum core developers
have tentatively decided to implement a new proof-of-work (PoW )
algorithm, dubbed ProgPoW, which would decrease the efficiency
divide between ASICs and GPUs, while rendering current Ethereum
ASICs obsolete.

According to another developer on Ethereum Magicians, David
Vorick, ProgPoW would favor larger ASIC producers because the
more complex hardware needed would exacerbate the economies
of scale involved.
Following Vorick’s comment, a developer named Alexey Akhunov
stated in a response post:

“If we want to obsolete the current EtHash mining devices,
but at the same time not to induce more secretive
behaviour on the part of ASIC manufacturers, we need to
‘embrace’ it and switch to an ASIC-friendly algorithm now
instead of an ASIC-unfriendly algorithm. Which the
opposite of what we are doing.”

Ethereum devs’ general rationale behind objecting to using ASICs
to mine ETH is that specialized hardware has no natural
distribution, no reserve group, a high barrier to entry, production
centralization and backdoor potential.

The rationale was gently challenged by Vorick, who asked “what
needs to be done in order to bring ProgPoW hardware peacefully to
the Ethereum community?” Vorick continued:

“Nobody has interest in making enemies or being
hardforked and invalidated, yet multiple groups have
interest in making special purpose Ethereum mining
hardware, which at this point means targeting ProgPoW.”

The developer argued that the amount of money at stake
guarantees that at least some hardware producers will choose to
keep new ASICs secret to prevent a new hard fork making the tech
obsolete. Vorick then poses the question:

“If a hardware developer manages to create a ProgPoW
ASIC that outperforms GPUs by a surprising margin [...] is
it better for that manufacturer to keep their discovery secret
and mine secretly, or is it better for that manufacturer to
sell openly?”

Linzhi, a Chinese mining hardware producer, had already released
a call to Ethereum developers to “publish rules for what
constitutes a good ProgPoW ASIC maker.” The company declared
that it is currently designing an Ethash mining machine,
announcing:

“We reject arbitrary enforcement of rules, and request clear
and equal guidelines to be established for all hardware
makers. Today we are calling upon the Ethereum
developers to publish rules and requirements for what
constitutes a good ProgPoW ASIC maker.”

Akhunov commented on Twitter today, Jan. 8, that it would be
great to establish a transparent dialogue between developers and
an ASIC manufacturer, such as Linzhi. According to him, Ethereum
core developers lack the kind of expertise of such producers, and
open information about ASIC capabilities would be useful to them.
As Cointelegraph reported today, the Ethereum Classic ( ETC ) team
had tweeted that anomalous activity on the ETC network might be
attributed to Linzhi’s testing of new 1,400Mh machines meant for
the Ethash algorithm — the PoW algorithm currently employed by
both Ethereum and Ethereum Classic. Following the statement,
Linzhi Shenzhen's director of operations denied these claims in a
Tweet that has since been deleted.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here


 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod