follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lucius

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29
1
It is true that a huge amount of electricity is lost every year and that it is about 50 000 TWh, and that for comparison BTC mining consumes somewhere around 200 TWh, which refutes any crazy claim that Bitcoin can have anything to do with a serious impact on the environment. Therefore, any use of what would otherwise be completely useless has a positive effect on the economy of a country and creates additional value.

There were some stories that "El Loco" is somewhat pro-BTC, but this is the first time I read that something concrete is happening in that direction - although this is not a revolutionary idea that has not been talked about before.

2
It seems that many have forgotten how "friendly" Trumo was towards crypto at the end of his first term, and that he had a lot of bad things planned that the new administration rejected or at least postponed for a long time. Whoever will be the president in the end will not change much when it comes to the attitude towards cryptocurrencies, because in the end they are all the same, fighting for their positions and for as much power as possible.

Interesting reading for those who want to know a little more -> The Mnuchin Files: New Documents Shed Light on Trump-Era Crypto Policy

3
This could be the final time we see Bitcoin below $100k I see a great opportunity for everyone to dive in before price pump. There has been little market action, as practically everyone is waiting for the final dip before the bull run to stack more. I'm still on the bench waiting for the right time to enter the market.

Are you referring to this cycle or in general that it will no longer be possible to buy under $100k? In any case, I believe that regardless of the strength of the bull run, in the end there will still be a correction, and that it will not be less than 50%, which will mean that at some point the price of BTC will again be as it is today (possibly even lower).

As for hesitating and waiting for the "right moment", it is certainly some kind of game or even gambling - because although it is possible that the price will fall even lower, it is also possible that it will not be much lower than the levels we had recently. In addition, a lot of people today are not at all satisfied, even when you tell them that within 1+ years they could earn 100% if they invest in BTC, because they dream of earnings from the past, and today's numbers are missing at least one 0 more that is not at all realistic.

4
Perhaps there are investors from China who chooses to keep their Bitcoin or some altcoins. Before the total ban, it's more on them going after altcoin if I remember around 2017-2019 era, Bitcoin was not even in their top crypto if I remember it correctly. They have some altcoins that has been developed by the Chinese that is on the top. Now, it's really hard to gauge the data as the game really change already with institutions and whales are into investment with all the ETF's and other instruments and future contracts.

I've seen a lot of different research over the years and it always seemed strange to me that the top countries in terms of "crypto adaptation" are those where there are some kind of bans regarding cryptocurrencies. However, it should probably be taken into account that a country that is quite crypto friendly but has less than 5 million inhabitants may have fewer crypto "users" than a country where cryptocurrencies are partially or completely banned, but that country has a very large population.

As I already wrote, the countries where there are the most people who own cryptocurrencies and the countries that have the most physical and online stores where it is possible to pay with cryptocurrencies are something completely different.

5
Yes history will repeat itself once again but I think people are afraid of such lower prices and they are selling their coins with loss which also affects the market negatively. If we wait and keep the previous history of halving in mind then we will not be caught in the opposite direction.
~snip~


I don't know what kind of low prices you are talking about considering that 1 BTC is still worth over $60k? About 1 year ago, the value was half as much, and some 18 months ago it was even 4 times less than today. If people failed to profit in all this, I really don't know what their problem is and whether they are perhaps too greedy or misled by various influencers who mostly talk about things they know nothing or very little about...

6
I will say that I hope that the pattern will be repeated, i.e. that the halving will have a positive effect on the price as before. What somewhat disturbed the usual sequence of events was the new ATH before the halving, but there was a good reason for that (spot ETFs), but also the fact that in the last bear market we broke even the ATH from 2017 in a negative sense, of course .

All this only indicates that we must always be prepared for unexpected situations that can significantly disrupt what we consider a logical sequence of events. Therefore, unless something unforeseen happens, I hope that we will again have a big bull run in the near future.

7
30.4% percent? It's crazy high and that means you could talk about cryptocurrency to stranger as conversation starter. Although it's a shame the article doesn't mention how they obtain the number/percentage, which makes me question it's accuracy.

When you look at the fact that, apart from Ukraine, there is not a single other country from Europe that has some of the countries with the highest purchasing power and, accordingly, they certainly have a significant share of people who own cryptocurrencies. This is obviously a very limited survey conducted by a payment processor that apparently generates clients from those countries.

It is always interesting to see China in the top 10 countries when it comes to cryptocurrencies, considering that they banned them some 7-8 years ago. However, for me, a much more significant research would be to get data on where, for example, Bitcoin is mostly used as a cryptocurrency, and not as an investment.

8
I imagine when they liquidate all that crypto, if they haven't already, it's going to cause a massive dip in the market price.

If most of them are altcoins (as it seems to me), then even the billions worth of altcoins that will be dumped on the market will not affect the price of BTC too much. If I happen to keep some altcoins that are mentioned around FTX, I would seriously think about getting rid of them as soon as possible.

But anyway, I am pleasantly surprised at the outcome. I certainly was not expecting FTX to repay any of its victims, after we saw the long line of rug-pulls that happened in 2022.

I hope I'm wrong, but things like this move very slowly and it could be years before anyone gets any funds back. If the Mt.Gox case has been going on for about 10 years, can we expect the FTX disaster to be over in at least half that time?

9
I've never been so convinced of $100k in the next cycle but after looking at this price chart I think $100k is minimum,.I think we're heading to $200k. I don't see anything stopping it.

Someone will have to buy a lot of BTC for that to happen, and now the question is whether we can count on retail buyers or institutional players - or maybe both? The fact is that we now have spot ETFs in the US and they have proven to be a powerful factor in pumping up the price, but we also see that money does not flow in only one direction.

I personally hope that the price at its peak will reach at least x2 compared to the post halving in 2020, which would mean around $140k. If that doesn't happen, I still hope that we will at least reach that magical $100k that everyone has been waiting for so long.

10
~snip~
You could just make a few hops inside your own wallet , or even exchange them for another coin in a swap service if you are very  paranoid.


It's always a good extra step for anyone who wants extra privacy, but it comes at a price since every transaction has a price. However, I would rather pay a few $ more than have possible problems when my coins arrive at their destination. Now that I'm already thinking about it, maybe mixers could also enable additional "mixing" of already mixed coins in a way to make a couple of hops through addresses that the client could specify in the mixing process.

11
I will only join those who are skeptical about what politicians say in an effort to gain power, and I think that we all have the right to doubt what one of the candidates for the US presidency says. The fact that he made a complete U-turn from his previous statements causes optimism among some, but for me Trump is still a man who can wake up in the morning and say something, and already have a completely opposite opinion in the evening.

Regardless of who the new US president is, we should keep in mind that people change, but that the main policy guidelines remain mostly the same, especially when it comes to the protection of national interests. One of those interests is certainly their domestic currency, and any other currency that would ever be a threat to it (including BTC) will not receive friendly treatment.

Here's some more positivity from Trump -> https://x.com/WatcherGuru/status/1788371259287327136


~snip~
This hurts to decide. It's like being forced to choose whether you want to die by being hit by a bus or by being set on fire.


I wouldn't be in their shoes with that choice, because I feel a bit sorry for Joe, who is obviously an old and sick man who simply has nothing to look for in politics, while on the other hand, Trump has so much negative weight on his back that it is not at all clear to me how can be a candidate for president.

12
OK, I wasn't aware of that.  However, what is going to stop people from simply adding +1 karma to each of a particular user's posts, as a form of merit abuse? I believe that each post can only get one karma, so that's a good start. However, I don't think it would be enough to stop a determined merit abuser (although I don't know if just any account can send karma or not).

Nothing prevents members from giving karma points in the way they think it should be done, and certainly there is abuse in all of this. As far as I know, a new feature should be available in the future that would show which post got karma so that we will be able to fight abuses more efficiently - now (except admin I guess) no one can know which post got positive/negative karma.

As for the rules for giving karma, all members who are Senior Rank+ can give them unlimitedly, and I think there is a limit of 1 user to another user only 1 karma every 10 hours.

13
We need to see user reviews of this service, so that it doesn't end up becoming another YoMix.

Trust is gained over time, although it can be betrayed at any moment, as we have witnessed many times so far. Theoretically, 100 users of this forum can try this mixer and everything goes well, and the 101 users who try to mix a slightly larger amount can be left without everything.


Also, I think they need a few more things:
- Contingency plan: How are you going to protect yourself from the government(s)?
- Proof of reserves: About how many bitcoins do they have to run the operation?
- Jurisdiction: Which country is the service operating from?


Protect yourself from governments? The only thing is that he places his service on servers in a country beyond the reach of all those who fight against it. Proof of reserves is something that definitely makes sense, and that should be the first thing the OP should have done.

14
Such cases only prove that people who have a lot of money are not necessarily intelligent - because losing money in such a trivial way would be really shameful for me personally. Without going into the details of the case, if I had tens of millions of dollars worth of coins and if I were to do such an extremely valuable transaction, I would check everything at least ten times - not to mention that the use of a hardware wallet would be mandatory.

The hardware wallet allows us to check whether the address in the interface is identical to the one that came from our device, which means that something like this can never happen to us. I would say that people learn best from their own mistakes, even though this one would be extremely expensive - although there is a suspicion that the story was made up so that the owner could avoid paying taxes - and it is not the first time that people have pretended that they were hacked, and in fact they just transferred coins to another address that is still in their possession.

15
Apart from all the could, can possible in that article there is one thing that really made me raise some eyebrow

Quote
Michaël van de Poppe, founder of trading firm MNTrading, suggests that Bitcoin’s dominance may have peaked as traders begin to shift liquidity to altcoins. Crypto trader Matthew Hyland echoed this, highlighting that Bitcoin market dominance is losing major support.

WTF is this guy smoking, Bitcoin is all over the news and there is like no talk about altcoins whatsoever, everything is about Bitcoin, Bitcoin ETF, bitcoin bonds, approval and regulations, no coin is coming even close to the spotlight and he thinks that altcoins are driving the market. One hiccup from the king and everyone is in red but lol, Bitcoin is losing dominance. Good luck keeping the market in the green with PEPE.

These guys obviously have their own vision of how the crypto-market works, and it is not excluded that they try to direct those who read in the direction of investing in altcoins by selling them the story that Bitcoin is losing its dominance. I have always called articles like this cheap PR, because in reality, when you look at it, some people just want to promote themselves and their business in such a way that they will say something that people will discuss.

Logical thinking is not the forte of such people - I always remember the famous Tom Lee, whose statements could be used to write a book called "A Hundred Wrong Speculations" ::)

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod