When will I get access to post our client campaigns in the Altcoin page

You're still pretty vague.
Can you provide all the information you have and what exactly you want to publish here?

To reduce spam, it is not enough to just register an account and flood the forum with links. But if you would explain what exactly you plan to do, maybe you will get concrete answers and a solution to the problem.

Anyhow, the big question is who will replace him. Names currently floating around in the news are: Roberto De Zerbi, Thomas Tuchel, Kieran McKenna, Mauricio ­Pochettino and Thomas Frank.

This is the essence of the problem. Maybe ETH doesn't look like the best of the best, but who is the alternative?

All those listed are good managers, they are rightly mentioned as a possible replacement, but I don't see that any of them has enough capacity for what awaits him in MU. All of them are excellent when there are no great expectations from them and when they are not under the scrutiny of the public.

De Zerbi, had a great last season when he succeeded Graham Potter. No one expected much and not much attention was paid to his work. This allowed him to work relaxed and he produced results.

Pochettino, had some success with Tottenham if you call it success even though you didn't win anything. Then when he had to take the final step forward, he completely failed. Of course, even then no one expected Tottenham to do anything more significant and there were no criticisms when they played badly. Everything fell apart when the criticism became stronger.

Thomas Tuchel is very conflicted, a very similar nature to Mourinho. If he didn't succeed in Bayern, which was much better organized, why would he manage to sort out the mess that is in MU? Also failed in PSG, and the CL title with Chelsea at a time when no one expected anything from them. The following season, everything fell apart when more was expected.

McKenna was already at MU, as an assistant to Ole. Many blamed him for Ole's failures. He is promising, I believe he will be a big name one day, but it is too early for him to take over MU now. He needs to make several successful seasons in a row.

Thomas Frank also fell under the pressure of the previous successful season. It's one thing to lead a team that is content if it's not fighting for survival, and it's quite another thing to lead MU where only wins are satisfying.

Most people are not willing/not able to put that sort of money for investment.

However, there is obviously a sufficient number of those who have enough Bitcoin on hold in their bag, so why not reinvest in a fairly secure platform and upgrade the portfolio?
Hodl is fine, but why not increase assets through a platform that has been operating for years and has a good reputation.

That's what I asked for, and I believe those ideas would be quite helpful without any doubt. Yes, I'm active on Bitcointalk gambling board and I even participate in those contests myself.

You said earlier that I should present ideas and propose them to the administrators. I say that users should take the initiative, and there are plenty of ideas, many with Btt can be used here as well.

But, on this forum casinos aren't as active as they are on Bitcointalk, and those contests can be only possible if casinos get interested in this forum as well.

None of the current campaigns on this forum are of casinos. Some of the campaign managers successfully moved some casino campaigns on this forum but all of those are inactive currently.

Once again, you should not wait for a casino to come here, but create a place where it will be attractive for them to come. No one, regardless, of the casino or some other type of business, will come here just because users want more campaigns and payment for writing.

For example, why don't we have threads here that will be regularly moderated and where current casino promotions will be written about? Every casino has at least one promotion per week.
Why is there not a single thread that will offer feedback on currently reliable and reputable casinos? It could certainly help

If they were to be realized and gather a certain number of users, I am quite sure that it is a matter of time when some casino will come to stand out through promotion.

If you are active in the gambling section on Btt as you say, starting similar discussions should not be a problem. So, don't wait for the admin to bring you a casino signature campaign, but try to make an interesting place for them. This is the essence of a quality forum.

Quote from: Baofeng on May 25, 2024, 11:45:24 PM

No, they will give you the second option to deposit on the same address to make it > .0015 as a minimum.

Yes, but this has only been around for about 6 months.

I checked later, and this possibility really exists. Quite fair to users.
So, only when the total amount of BTC exceeds 0.0015, the mixing process starts. Are there any other restrictions, a specific period for how long this is active or similar?

MrSpasybo, what do you think about the proposal that these data be inserted into a table so that it would be more transparent for several months? That way it would be easier to analyze the data and their movement depending on the period.

Quote from: examplens on May 20, 2024, 08:43:16 PM

Some of the successful ideas from Btt can be used. This will certainly open up more chances for casinos to come here as well.

Nice to hear that, I believe you should share those ideas here so the admin/moderators/president could consider those and such ideas might help the forum to have more signature campaigns, specifically the gambling ones.

You didn't understand what I wrote, did you?
I repeat, there are good ideas on Btt that could be transferred here, or at least something similar. Various competitions, contests, etc... Those who are active in the gambling section know that.

All to increase the quality and activity of the gambling section on this forum

We might need to increase the quality of the gambling board of this forum.

+

Quote from: bitmover on May 25, 2024, 11:48:02 PM

I agree with this.

I think the community is too aggressive is bitcointalk. People are very intolerant and harsh and a person can be easily red tagged... I don't agree with many red tags I have seen there

I know, unfortunately I know how aggressive the BTT community is sometimes. That's why we do things differently here.

Thanks to both of you, @examplens and @bitmover, for your interest in improving the forum.

+2 for each of you.

Yes, Bitcointalk users can be very aggressive with very little tolerance.
We have had a large number of campaigns there for years, and there is a lot of competition when applying, following the rules of the campaign has become very important because it is very easy to lose a place. This is what is missing from this forum, I hope that some new campaigns will bring such an upgrade.

There is an obvious pattern of behaviour, and I have the impression that the natives of this forum and the campaign signatures experience it as some kind of bounty whose results nobody cares about.
So for example (see the post time)


It is very easy to recognize this kind of behaviour.
What do these three users have in common? Burstposting, participants (of the same) campaign, zoom 1 membership, non-teleported.

The manager should pay attention to such things, and possibly give some warnings to such users with an explanation of what they are doing wrong. Without raising the quality, there will be no new campaigns or forum growth.

I will put a link to this discussion in the campaign thread to draw the manager's attention to this.