Thank you for the wonderful efforts you make every month

Also, creating a summary to compare between the months is a great job to facilitate comparison and analyze data more easily.

Through comparison, I see that there is an increase in the number of new members, but it is meager so far, meaning only about less than 800 members for about 5 months, which is still a small number.

The biggest growth in the number of visits is around +139.65%, which is considered good and interesting.
In general, the statistics look promising, and I hope that we will make more progress in the following months.

Thank you again +1

Of course, the amount of 30 ETH is a very small amount for the creator of Ethereum, and it does not constitute a large number in a large case like this, which requires senior lawyers and may last a long time, but I expect that Vitalik Buterin aims to show his moral support for the case of Alexei Burtsev, developer of Tornado Cash.

The issue is primarily related to privacy, which is an issue that has and continues to raise a lot of controversy in the United States, and it is certain that there are many figures and associations interested in the issue, and this behavior of a famous figure like Vitalik Buterin will certainly help in gathering more of the necessary financial and moral support.

However, before the resolution passed in the U.S. House of Representatives, President Joe Biden said he intended to veto the bill to “protect investors in crypto-asset markets and to safeguard the broader financial system.”

I always laugh when I hear this phrase “to protect investors in crypto asset markets”!! This phrase is really funny because are investors protected by preventing them from working in cryptocurrencies? Or by banning cryptocurrencies completely? This is stupidity.

For example, if you wanted to protect people from the dangers of riding in cars, would you prevent them from riding in cars at all? Or do you ban the use of cars entirely? Or must he warn them of the dangers while providing appropriate safety measures to protect them from the dangers of cars?

As most of the members mentioned above, no one cares about ICOs anymore, as most of them are fraudulent projects and gave Crypto a bad reputation when it spread like an epidemic in 2017.

There are currently IDO Launchpads and CEX Launchpads where you can find some projects that can be promising, of course nothing is guaranteed but the presence of these projects on famous exchanges like Binance gives them a great reputation but they are not necessarily reliable to be successful.

Anyway, try this site, it may be useful to you:
https://cryptorank.io/fundraising-platforms/ico

Quote from: yhiaali3 on May 29, 2024, 09:58:13 PM

Since BlackRock entered the market, we know that it will have a major negative impact on Bitcoin and its main features, namely decentralization and privacy, in addition to the fact that investors no longer own real Bitcoin, but rather shares in a central company, while BlackRock is the one who owns real Bitcoin.

And how was Bitcoin affected by this?
What stopped decentralization, their coins follow the same protocol, they can't move coins without following the consensus rules, they can't overwrite the consensus rules by holding coins!

When Salvador bought coins, wasn't that also bad?
How is Salvador buying coins good and how is BR buying coins bad?

Bitcoin was affected by this because a large amount of Bitcoin accumulated in the hands of a central company or companies. Whenever Bitcoin accumulates in the hands of a small group of people, we become closer and closer to centralization.

In addition, instead of buying Bitcoin and keeping it in wallets whose keys they own, people now keep it in the form of shares in a central company, similar to a banking system.

As for El Salvador, it did not buy Bitcoin for speculation as companies do, but it bought it within the framework of the official adoption of Bitcoin as the country’s official currency, and I think this is something else different.

This is like the "Bitcoin is dead" joke that spreads on the Internet from time to time. I think they use it to spread FOMO and nothing more. Sometimes it is intentional by whales to spread panic and buy at cheap prices from weak hands.

Regardless of whether it is a joke or not, this is ridiculous talk. Bitcoin cannot be killed because governments are the biggest enemy of Bitcoin. If they could kill Bitcoin, they would have done so a long time ago. If they had the technical means capable of stopping the Bitcoin network, they would have done so as well.