Ví tiền điện tử Trust Wallet đang kêu gọi người dùng Apple vô hiệu hóa iMessage, với lý do “thông tin đáng tin cậy” về cách khai thác zero-day có thể cho phép hacker chiếm quyền kiểm soát điện thoại của người dùng.

“Cảnh báo dành cho người dùng iOS: Chúng tôi có thông tin đáng tin cậy về việc khai thác zero-day có rủi ro cao nhắm vào iMessage trên Dark Web,” Trust Wallet đăng lên X cách đây ít giờ.

Iphone bây giờ cũng đã có nhiều lỗ hổng bị khai thác, cứ càng hiện đại thì lại càng tạo ra thêm nhiều lỗ hổng bên cạnh những tính năng mới, cuối cùng lại cần thêm cập nhật để vá lỗi cũ. Mọi người có sử dụng iPhone thì cũng nên thận trọng, tốt nhất là sử dụng riêng 1 chiếc điện thoại hoặc thiết bị để tương tác với crypto, không tương tác với những tính năng hoặc mục đích khác để tránh mã độc hoặc bị khai thác dữ liệu.

TrustWallet cảnh báo cũng không thừa, nhưng nếu có bằng chứng rõ ràng và đáng thuyết phục thì sẽ tốt hơn. Em tin rằng chúng ta sẽ sớm có câu trả lời về điều này khi những chuyên gia an ninh mạng và crypto tham gia để điều tra và có kết luận cho cộng đồng.

Exactly, if we compare the growth rate then Bitcoin is always ahead of Gold which doesn't mean people investing on Gold decreased than crypto investors. It can be comparison that can be shown for a layman to make them realise they can also add BTC as their asset in their portfolio.

Myself investing on both Gold and Bitcoin since I am started making money, even though Bitcoin is highly profitable still I can't avoid Gold cause it gives the security than nothing else.

We all know that investment requires both safety and profit. Gold is for safety, BTC is for profit - it is the right choice for professional investments, and I believe that you are such a professional investor. For young people, they may prefer BTC to Gold. MicroStrategy also only accumulates BTC and not Gold, perhaps because it is a software company and believes in the Internet future.

For most people or investment funds, I think a small portion, less than 5%, allocated to BTC will generate significant returns while still keeping risk under good control. Crypto is still a new and unsustainable field, but only by accepting this risk can real, superior returns be generated.

The market is doing great we have not had Satoshi's presence ever since and since it is an open-source we will be doing great even if the real Satoshi exposes himself.

I truly hope that Satoshi's identity will never be revealed and BTC will maintain its independence without being significantly impacted by any individual. BTC is considered a commodity because there is no single individual or organization in charge, while ETH has not yet been confirmed by the SEC as a commodity because there are still some factors related to Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation.

Honestly, I would like to know Satoshi's identity, but it would be better if only I knew it and I would keep it a secret to protect the future of BTC in the economy!

I think this doesn’t depend at all on how old a person is in cryptocurrency, there is no specific age category. I know a lot of people who are over 60, who are over 50, or over 40 years old. And in fact, I know very few people who are 20-30 years old. Cryptocurrency, people with a certain mindset are involved in cryptocurrency; they are just young people who, in fact, just work and don’t think about anything.

Investment decisions depend on many factors, including personal perceptions and views, which are shaped by the age and era one has experienced. Those who have been exposed to and seen opportunities in gold, oil, and stocks tend to favor them. Conversely, younger people exposed to the internet are more inclined towards BTC and crypto. Of course, there are many exceptions: many older adults still prefer BTC like Saylor, or many younger people are still anti-crypto.

I am just presenting a few cases so that we can see that many billionaires and many investment funds are starting to take an interest in BTC as a financial instrument for the investment field. This means that BTC is becoming an important part of the economy, the BTC cap has the potential to continue to grow strongly in the future and may catch up with the Gold cap in the future, possibly in 10-20 years.

I'm glad you've prove on your own that Bitcoin is a better investment than gold. It's been compared since then, and some individuals say gold is far better. Their reasoning is that, despite the minimal ROI, they are confident that it will not decrease. That is why they choose gold over bitcoin. One of the reasons I believe they prefer gold is that they are unfamiliar with Bitcoin.

A simple comparison of the growth of BTC and Gold over the past 15 years shows that BTC is a more attractive investment than Gold. Gold proponents have their own views, and I don't think they're stupid. They need the security that only Gold can provide due to its global acceptance. I'm not against accumulating Gold, but I think they should learn about BTC and allocate a few percent of their portfolio to BTC at the right time to get better returns.

As an airdrop hunter I would argue that Airdrop is just a means to earn free coins, whether it's a memecoin project, Defi, a new Chain or something else, all in one.

And every airdrop that is done must have carried out an analysis process so that the project that is done not only gives useless results, but also provides great rewards.

In recent years, many Tesnet airdrops have rewarded thousands of dollars for its early adopters, and some memecoins have also come with big rewards.

Good opportunities exist everywhere, but only experienced hunters who are willing to take a little risk can turn their time and effort into big rewards. Airdrops have been around for years, but they only really became popular thanks to the Testnets in 2023 and the stories of young hunters making millions of USD. I think they also contribute value to the market through media promotion, helping people to become interested in and aware of crypto, and thus turning them into future crypto supporters or investors.

What you say is very true, for me what Satoshi did was a genius, something that no government or anyone in the world can fight with, the fact of having created such a Self-sufficient economy and that just the fact that it did not suffer from Inflation is something that goes far beyond what all of life has been planted in the economy, the economy is a failure, because it is only Backed by gold, and we all know that gold is not a guarantee for governments, especially The one that has the greatest hierarchy with its hegemony is the USA, which makes its direct controls so that they continue to use the dollar as a world currency, but we all know the errors and shortcomings that the dollar has.

As long as there is inflation, things with the traditional economy will not go well, and bitcoin clearly does that, which is why Satoshi's identity should never be revealed, in fact for me it will never be revealed.

BTC was born due to ongoing inflation, which erodes the value of labor and allows people to buy fewer goods with the same amount of work. As long as inflation persists, BTC will continue to be in demand. While the severe inflation of the past few years has heightened public awareness of the nature of money, the story of BTC's true value has not yet been effectively promoted. It seems that traditional investors are only interested in spot BTC ETFs and not the revolution that BTC is leading.

I hope Satoshi is still following the development of BTC and the crypto market, and it would be better if Satoshi could contribute his/her thoughts through a different account to help us find the right and effective direction. Or maybe Satoshi is already doing so without us knowing

Of course, project technology will determine the success of a coin/token. Because good technology that is needed by the community will make the project successful and this will have an impact on the token price increasing.

I highly doubt that statement. If technology is a decisive factor in token success, the better the technology, the higher the token price or market cap. However, we see many cases where the opposite is true: EOS has a good and stable DPOS but its market cap is currently #96, while SOL with a less stable POH is at #5, or DOGE using POW is at #9.

This means that good technology is only one part of creating market value for a token. If the project does not have good marketing or does not have the support of investment funds, investor confidence will decrease and the token price will not be able to be effectively supported. In addition to technology, I believe that the community, media, investment funds, and market makers also play an important role in the success of tokens and projects.