follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - cryptomarcianos

Pages: [1]
1
Depending on the energy source, researchers estimate that crypto-mining can produce 3-15 million tons of global carbon emissions. Right from the manufacturing of mining equipment to cooling facilities and the handling of e-waste in addition to the energy consumed by the mining equipment to secure the network, it can be quite a wasteful process, however I do know that PoW has proved tobe an effective method to secure a network, as long as 51% of the whole network is not controlled by a central authority.

However, I cam across Virtual ASICs by Concordium is a very interesting concept that has been scientifically proven by academic research. I think it might be worth looking at. Virtual ASICs are essentially a virtualized version of proof-of-work.

Miners can buy on-chain virtual mining machines which can be powered by virtual electricity. Similar to their physical counterparts, each powered virtual ASIC has a certain chance to win the right to create the next block. In the boundary case where virtual electricity is free, the protocol corresponds to proof-of-stake using an ASIC token which is separate from the currency itself (the amount of stake equals your virtual computing power).

In the other boundary case where virtual computers are free, we get a proof-of-burn equivalent. That is, a consensus mechanism in which miners ‘burn’ money to obtain lottery tickets for the right to create the next block.

The authors ( “ Virtual ASICs: Generalized Proof-of-Stake Mining in Cryptocurrencies “) of provide the cryptographic machinery required to base a consensus protocol on Virtual ASICs, as well as to sell them in sealed-bid auctions on-chain. They ensure that as long as a majority of the miners in the system mine honestly, bids remain both private and binding, and that miners cannot censor the bids of their competitors. To achieve this, the authors introduce a novel all-or-nothing broadcast functionality in blockchains that is of independent interest.

I think this is an energy efficient and cryptographically secure method that might help us save the environment and at the same time not compromise on network security. What do you think about this?

2
With APY's on yield farming reaching insane levels and also crypto being seen as a good hedge against fiat now there is a feeling that crypto is replacing standard money. Though I don’t think cryptocurrencies will replace “standard money” immediately fully. The main reason is, there are too many formal big players like Banks, Payment processors and many other middle men, agencies out there who get their share from the current monetary system.

Perhaps as more adoption grows and more business Blockchains like Concordium start serving the masses by integrating public blockchain in enterprises, with regulatory compliance and on chain ID verification in place, it might become easier for businesses to adopt this technology and might become a strong parallel money system that can co-exist with the traditional money.

Global Debt is something that is to be a major worry for all countries and the fiat money losing its value over years and economies heading towards hype inflation of fiat money.

Banks, governments are looking at introducing stable coins. And digital money dominance will eventually increase with reducing paper money. People will be more comfortable to view digital numbers on their screens and
also have a sense of owning and controlling it, this is when cryptocurrencies will take the cake since it will not be owned by a single entity.

I think we are heading towards a world where the definition of "standard money" itself will change. Now coming to the question of how long will the part last? Well, the part can never stop if it is fully regulated and legal from a regulatory point of view. Hence, I think the way forward will be regulatory compliant crypto. But crypto can never be stopped.

What are your thoughts? What is your "standard money"?

3


The global internet of Things (IoT) in the energy market will generate a revenue of $41.2 billion by 2027 as per a report by Research Dive.
 

The report also added that the significance of artificial intelligence(AI) in IoT in energy is boosting the global internet of things in energy market growth. With the rise in demand for IoT devices everywhere and also the global internet penetration expected to increase. Security will be a major concern. Blockchain is the only way such security concerns can be effectively put to rest.
 

But use of blockchains at such a large scale would mean choosing robust blockchains who can handle such environments.
 

This is exactly why new generation blockchains like Concordium are working and researching on providing the promise of blockchain for business.

With regulatory compliance by design, privacy and verification of users identity, identity management will become easy for IOT devices to interact with humans. Billions of devices would also mean the network needs to have fast transaction capabilities and high throughput at a global scale with Concordium is building.


Fast finality and easy to deploy smart contracts will give blockchains like Concordium an edge that will help bridge the needs of the IoT industry and the Blockchain Industry.

As years fly by technology will become more accessible to the masses as it gets cheaper. That also means an ubiquitous internet where billions of devices need to autonomously interact with each other.

There will be multiple devices that need to pay for various services and authentication, for all transactions to be hack proof the only solution seems to be a blockchain in pace so all transactions are safe and cryptographically secure.

We will live in a connected world.

4
General Discussion / Replacing the future of Internet with Blockchain
« on: August 24, 2020, 04:18:17 AM »
Blockchain technology is changing the way we interact, the way we build and understand the internet. Blockchain has been described as the technology that can power the next generation of the internet, the decentralized web, and the web 3.0 generation.

It is important to understand how the internet is currently “centralized” and the problems this creates. “Centralization” refers to one or a small number of entities holding sway over a network.

A few companies control most of the action on the internet, and they are known as the FAANGs (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google, with other companies like Microsoft and Twitter rounding out the oligopoly). Together, they effectively control the internet. This can be seen in two related areas: data privacy and control of information.

Blockchain on the other hand is all about powering the internet in a decentralized manner such that no single entity has complete control. A move from centralization to decentralization would be a significant change in how information is stored and shared online. A decentralized internet would not use centralized servers. Instead, it would rely on a network of many computers and widely distributing data.

Bitcoin and Ethereum has shown us how Public Blockchains can change the way we interact with the internet. There are projects like Concordium that are heavily researched by researchers from some of the best universities and research centers across the world changing the way blockchains are perceived by businesses. With regulatory compliance by design and fast transactions and high throughput at a global scale. Provable finality helps them prove Finality as a Service ( FaaS) helping business adapt to the new technology with ease.

Some of the smartest individuals are building the new internet. With business on blockchain the final transition will happen and internet will change forever.

I have not come across any other stronger contender that has come this close to replacing the internet as we know it today. Sure, machine learning, VR, AR are revolutionary too but they are not replacing the internet.

5
Cryptocurrency discussions / What is COBRA? What was it created for?
« on: August 16, 2020, 01:28:50 AM »
There was a Blockchain Research Center at Aarhus University that was opened up on 1st February 2019. The center has been researching into blockchain technology, with focus on security, transparency and general usability.

According to Professor Jesper Buus Nielsen, who is heading the Concordium Blockchain Research Center at Aarhus University ( COBRA ) their goal is to gather experience from previous generations of blockchains, compare that with the research they have conducted there at the department over the decade, and on the basis of that comparison forge new knowledge about the technology.

Blockchain technology is considered as one of the most important technological discoveries in recent times. The technology is expected to revolutionize foreign exchange systems, strengthen copyrights and digitalize electoral systems. So far, however, the technology has had a slightly tarnished reputation due to problems with security, transparency and usability, among other things. A new research center at the Department of Computer Science at Aarhus University will now try to solve these problems.

The center will be a strong part of Aarhus University's comprehensive digitalization initiatives and, together with the Centre for Digitalization, Big Data and Data Analytics (DIGIT), which they established in 2017, it will give Danish IT research and education an important boost says the dean at Science and Technology, Niels Christian Nielsen.

In Aarhus they are world champions in cryptography. It is no coincidence that the research center is located at Aarhus University. The researchers at the Department of Computer Science are some of the best in the world within research areas of cryptography and verification, which are central to developing the blockchain technology.

"With an investment of this scale in Aarhus University's world-class computer scientists, Denmark is at the forefront of digitization providing companies and researchers a solid foundation for taking full advantage of the opportunities new technologies present," says Anders Samuelsen, Denmark's Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Funded by the Concordium Foundation :

The research center is being funded by the Concordium Foundation, established non-profit foundation, that is developing the Concordium Blockchain Network: a new-generation blockchain, with focus on user identification and transparency. The foundation is supporting the centre with just over DKK 10 million (EUR 1.3 million) a year over the first five years of the centre's lifetime.

"The Concordium Foundation has granted the Concordium Blockchain Research Center Aarhus DKK 50 million (EUR 6.7 million) over the next five years to fund non-targeted research into the technology. Our hope is that, in the long term, the research can help both the private sector and the public authorities to use blockchain technology securely and effectively for different types of transactions," says Lars Seier Christensen, chairman of the Concordium Foundation.

Concordium Blockchain Research Center Aarhus will be located at Department of Computer Science at Aarhus University with Professor Jesper Buus Nielsen as center leader. All results from the centers research will be made publicly available via open access. More information about the center can be found here.

I have been following some research work from Cobra for a few months now and I must say it is a class apart. Look forward to the mainnet launch of the final Blockchian.

6
t's no surprising news that Blockchain holds potential implications for global commerce. It could make trade more efficient by removing the manual and paper-based processes and introducing streamlined and automated ones. A public blockchain can be a great collaborative tool because it’s decentralized, and no single entity can own it.

That’s why blockchain is more than just the underlying technology for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

We also have been seeing over the past few years that Banks are heavily investing in Blockchain and exploring the distributed ledger technology.

What seemed like a thing of scifi-movies is now turning out to be a reality. We are not far off from seeing Banks fully evolve so that they catch up with technologies such as Bitcoin and others. Just like there is no escaping the system, there is no escaping the new reality of digital money. If banks don't play catch up they need to perish and Banks have realized them quite early ( I still think banks have some time left to survive).

Some popular Banks exploring blockchain :

1. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)

2. Agricultural Bank of China Limited

3. ALFA Bank from Russia

4. Yes Bank from India

5. UOB (United Overseas Bank) from Singapore

6. CommonWealth Bank from Australia

7. LatiPay from New Zealand

8. Kotak Bank

9. RAK Bank

10. The Federal Bank from India

It is indeed interesting that so many banks have been exploring blockchain or distributed ledger technology. In the process of exploring this revolutionary technology banks have realized that there is no use in re inventing the wheel. Many have realized that there is no point in closed permissioned blockchains. To harness the true power of Blockchain they need public blockchain. But, as we all know Banks deal with financial details and instruments that may require privacy and everything cannot be public.

Another problem with public ledgers is the factor of accountability and anonymity, because Banks need to follow certain,strict guidelines.

I think by providing onchain-ID verification and regulatory compliance provided by Blockchain protocols such as Concordium at a base protocol layer, it would become easier for blockchain enterprise adoption and help Banks make the shift to Public blockchains. Concordium claims to the worlds first public blockchain to have regulatory compliance and on-chain ID verification.

They are designing a 2-Layer Consensus Mechanism that combines a Nakamoto-style Blockchain with an innovative finalization for fast transactions and secure finality under adverse conditions. Concordium includes an identity layer at the protocol level and a ZK Proof Based mechanism to ensure a high level of privacy ( Banks would love privacy since it is very essential for them to operate )  and regulatory compliance at the same time.

Banks want privacy not anonymity. I wont be too surprised if many Banks switch over to Concordium as a choice of their Public Blockchain to leverage public blockchain but also uphold privacy and their standard business practices.

The world is changing so should the banks.

7
We all know that in proof-of-work based cryptocurrencies, miners invest computing power to maintain a distributed ledger.

The drawback of such a consensus protocol is its immense energy consumption. Bitcoin, for example consumes as much energy as a small nation state and we are all aware of that.

To prevent this waste of energy various consensus mechanism such as proof-of-space or proof-of-stake have been proposed.

In proof-of-stake, block creators are selected based on the amounts of money they stake instead of their expanded computing power.

Virtual ASICs are essentially a virtualized version of proof-of-work. Miners can buy on-chain virtual mining machines which can be powered by virtual electricity.

Similar to their physical counterparts, each powered virtual ASIC has a certain chance to win the right to create the next block. In the boundary case where virtual electricity is free, the protocol corresponds to proof-of-stake using an ASIC token which is separate from the currency itself (the amount of stake equals your virtual computing power).

In the other boundary case where virtual computers are free, we get a proof-of-burn equivalent.

That is, a consensus mechanism in which miners ‘burn’ money to obtain lottery tickets for the right to create the next block.

The researchers at Concordium provide the cryptographic machinery required to base a consensus protocol on Virtual ASICs, as well as to sell them in sealed-bid auctions on-chain.

They ensure that as long as a majority of the miners in the system mine honestly, bids remain both private and binding, and that miners cannot censor the bids of their competitors.

To achieve this, the authors introduce a novel all-or-nothing broadcast functionality in blockchains that is of independent interest.

Here is a video where they explain this concept in detail : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR7IxjgXeQ4&feature=emb_logo

What do you think of Virtual ASIC and Proof of Work Mechanisms as compared to Proof of Work?

8
Blockchain Technology / Understanding Finality in Blockchain
« on: August 11, 2020, 04:55:56 AM »
Finally there is a project that is bringing Finality , and not only are they bringing it, one can also borrow it through their novel FaaS ( finality as a Service )

It is certainly a major challenge to engineer a high assurance implementation of a finality layer such as Afgjort and execute it over a blockchain protocol with a large enough user base (and a proper stake distribution) guaranteeing that less than one-third of the committee is malicious.

Concordium claims it's engineering team is tackling this challenge, their researchers are already hard at work on one of the most innovative features of the Concordium blockchain: Finality as a Service (FaaS).

According to them, Concordium’s FaaS will make strong finality guarantees accessible to third party decentralized applications without the need for their users (or operators) to execute Afgjort. Concordium’s FaaS will allow third-party applications to submit data to be finalized by Afgjort running on Concordium’s blockchain.

For example, a third-party blockchain protocol can submit block hashes to have its own blocks finalized by Concordium’s FaaS.

Alternatively, a mission-critical third-party smart contract conducting high valued financial transactions can submit transaction data and smart contract states for FaaS finalization.

Once these data are finalized by FaaS, they enjoy the same strong finality guarantees provided by the Concordium blockchain itself. More importantly, it does not matter that the third party application has a small user base or that it cannot guarantee the selection of a committee with less than a-third malicious users since the finality guarantees of FaaS will be provided by Afgjort being executed with the full resources of the Concordium network.

Do you think this is a technical feat? I haven't come across another blockchain project do this yet.

9
The core tenet of any proof-of-stake blockchain is ensuring that all participants have skin in the game. You can’t just show up empty-handed to this potluck!

By having participants put something down in order to have a seat at the table, PoS blockchain not only uses its distributed wealth to protect the network from attacks but also has better mechanisms for handling inflation cheaply.

Some Projects are trying the tried and tested DPos with Zero Knowledge proofs variants.

Delegated Proof-of Stake :

This system contains a fixed number of validators on the network who have to be voted by the network. However, rather than having a rowdy system where voters, across different landscapes and timezones, may possess an undue advantage, the community is represented by elected entities known as delegates.

Candidates vie to be nominated as a delegate through community votes. Using their token, the community votes for delegates and the candidates with the most votes wins. Once appointed, users can send their tokens to delegates who will stake for them on their behalf. Block rewards earned by the delegate are shared proportionally among stakers.

However, delegates may also get to charge service fees ranging from 1–20% of the block reward. If a delegate misbehaves, the community can vote them out and vote in another candidate just as quickly.

dPoS is the most widely adopted and fastest-growing PoS consensus algorithm due to its fast transaction ability, scalability, cheap transaction fees, and novel democratic system that encourages honesty and efficiency from delegates.

Ongoing research and development on this protocol have resulted in variants addressing custodianship and liveliness.
These are:
Liquid Proof-of-Stake and
Bonded Proof-of-Stake

Liquid Proof-of-Stake: Liquid Proof-of-Stake makes delegation optional, allowing users to transfer their right to vote to another user without having to send their tokens along. It also gives users the right to vote in changes to the protocol (not just who delegates) and will penalize validators trying to exploit the network.

Bonded Proof-of-Stake: bPoS spots the same features as Liquid Proof-of-stake with one caveat; the network will penalize the validator and the stake delegated to them for jeopardizing the network’s safety and/or liveliness.

The democratization of blockchain through dPoS (and its variants) is ushering a free and fair ecosystem where anybody can participate in a peerless and distributed consensus system where their participation not only counts but is also rewarded. This is one of the reasons why privacy preserving projects like Concordium have chosen to deploy a Delegated Proof-of-Stake Consensus to both use the features of this consensus but also because they are certain that this model fits the best the current and future enterprise needs when it comes to new and agile technologies.

They also implement Zero Knowledge variant to help preserve privacy. Its mainly being used to make sure the DPos system that has been implement is a fair one without being able to track the delegates and also for various other reasons.

Have we seen any such variants before? Seems like a lot of academic research behind this in the past 1.5 - 2 years.

10
Quite often we hear about privacy preserving protocols. And their application in many different cryptos. Cyphers and code breakers are not new, however, the medium through which we use them has been evolving. Privacy-preserving protocols are the backbone of blockchain technology, a technology that has promised secure transactions and communication.

Let us compare two popular protocols.

ZK-SNARKs

Zk-SNARK stands for Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge.

Zk-SNARKs involve the construction of a proof of some specific knowledge without revealing the information. In other words, ZK-SNARKs allow for any entity to prove something to another that a statement is true without having to reveal any information other than the statement itself.
The “succinct” in zk-SNARKS is related to the amount of space required for a proof, only a few hundred bytes. This makes storing ZK-SNARKS on a blockchain more reasonable.

The drawback of zk-SNARKs is that they require a trusted setup. If a malicious actor has access to all the information used to generate the initial keys, that actor can then create proofs that look valid to the verifiers but are false. Many participants in a SNARK setup go to great lengths to ensure the randomness of the key generation is protected.

Imagine a situation in which you must prove membership of a specific group (i.e., individuals over the age of 18), however due to privacy concerns, you do not wish to reveal the exact date of your birth; then, you can use a zk-SNARK to prove this.

There have been various different projects employing ZK-SNARKS in different ways. Good examples are ZCash for its baselayer protocl, Ethereum for scaling strategies,Coda to have a succinct blockchain, Concordium to enable privacy amongst a regulated public chain with identity and regulation at a protocol level.

ZK-STARKs

STARKs are like SNARKs, but there are some very critical distinctions. First STARKs do not require a trusted set up to work. Secondly, zk-STARKs are post-quantum secure.

This is because STARKs rely on cryptographic functions that are not known to be susceptible to large quantum computations.

In other words, STARKs rely on weaker cryptographic assumptions than SNARKs. This feature is very important if we seek to build digital protocols that will stand the test of time. However, these features come at a cost. STARK proofs are at a minimum an order of magnitude larger than SNARK proofs. ZK Starks was manily introduced through Starkware.

The size of STARKs could lead to unnecessary blockchain bloat or worse, turn into a bandwidth sink for an active network.

11
Privacy-preserving protocols are the backbone of blockchain technology, a technology that has promised secure transactions and communication. What are the Privacy-preserving protocols available to blockchain-based technology?

Some projects are still in the research phase, some of them do not even have a token yet. Some of them yet to launch their mainnet, like Concordium its a very interesting project and well researched but could not find much details about the token. Lets make a concrete list of them.

Some of the of the projects I have heard of are :

1. Monero

2. ZCash

3. Concordium

4. Komodo

5. Grin

6. Beam

7. Priate Chain

8. Horizen

9. Particle

10. Tari

11. Verge

12. Ghost

Do you know any more? Did I leave any famous projects? What do you think will happen to our privacy in the coming years?

Pages: [1]
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod