follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Peter90

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 52
1
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Accepting Stablecoins for Big-Ticket Items?
« on: April 26, 2024, 04:57:30 PM »
Stablecoins (the ones that are pegged and backed by good assets,

Maybe you don't know it but what you are addressing are gold backed stablecoins


Gold is a much harder currency than the US Dollar





A gold backed stablecoin is much more stable than any US dollar backed stablecoins

2
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Accepting Stablecoins for Big-Ticket Items?
« on: April 26, 2024, 04:50:43 PM »

There is a small possibility that your balance will be frozen,

Of course
very small  :D






Tether is not a crypto money service business.
That said, the point is, if someone want to avoid risks... better stay away from un-regulated.
Imo

3
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Kinesis Stablecoins
« on: April 26, 2024, 04:44:30 PM »

Thanks for your research.
Indeed, with MiCA we are all in a blur at different scales.  ;D
We'll have to wait and see, as MiCA's Tier application for stablecoins will come into effect between June and December 2024. Perhaps the Kinesis project is still in a grey area regarding all this, but I hope they won't go as far as banning it in EU (although I wouldn't be surprised if they did...).

AFAIK, within the partnership with Indonesia's government, Kinesis should take the role of facilitating foreign remittances i.e. money sent to Indonesia from Indonesian workers abroad. In this role, Kinesis avoided the whole regulation concerning banks precisely because their currencies KAU and KAG were considered commodities.
(Gold and silver are singular in that they have this double aspect, they are both commodities and currencies.)
Maybe the same will happen in Europe.

But most probably, Kinesis will simply work within the Mica regulation.

4
SEC Expected To Deny Spot Ether ETFs In May, Consensys Sues Over 'Security' Status


According to four people who participated, recent meetings between issuers and the SEC have been one-sided and agency staff have not discussed substantive details about the proposed products.

That is in contrast to the intensive and detailed discussions between issuers and the agency in the weeks before its landmark approval of spot bitcoin ETFs in January, said the people who declined to be identified because the talks are private.

As CoinTelegraph reports, before the historic approval, the SEC rejected spot BTC ETF filings for over a decade.
It only changed its stance after Grayscale Investments won a court victory against the securities regulator in August 2023.

...

Balchunas also mentioned that SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s stance on Ether could also impact the decision process as he has refused to give clarity on whether Ether was a security.

We have detailed the furore over the classification of Ether as a security (or not) a number of times, but today saw the situation escalated as Consensys, a major backer of the Ethereum blockchain, filed a lawsuit against the agency in Texas federal court, asking the court, among other things, to resolve one of the biggest legal uncertainties hanging over the crypto industry by stating that Ethereum’s digital token, Ether, is not a security.

Fortune's Jeff John Roberts reports that in its 34-page legal filing, Consensys uses dramatic language to argue that the SEC’s efforts to exert jurisdiction over Ethereum is both illegal and a threat to blockchain technology more broadly.

“The SEC’s unlawful seizure of authority over ETH would spell disaster for the Ethereum network, and for Consensys. Every holder of ETH, including Consensys, would fear violating the securities laws if he or she were to transfer ETH on the network,” the complaint states.
“This would bring use of the Ethereum blockchain in the United States to a halt, crippling one of the internet’s greatest innovations.”


zerohedge.com

5
Stable Coins Forum / Re: The 6 Types of Stablecoins (Poll)
« on: April 25, 2024, 12:06:57 PM »
So you don’t take into account at that moment that even hard currency is valued everywhere using the fiat currency of the same dollar or euro;

Hi Wise,
the fact that hard currencies are valued in fiat currencies doesn't matter.

Let's make an example
the CHF (Swiss franc) is harder than the USD.
The fact that the CHF is valued in USD doesn't matter.
Why?
Because the USD can be valued in CHF too!


You can value gold in USD
and you can value USD in gold

You can value gold, USD and CHF in silver
you can value gold, USD and silver in CHF
you can value USD, CHF and silver in gold
etc.

The unit of measure that people use in order to value something is meaningless.
You can chose any unit of measure that you like.
Since the USD has been the world most used currency, it's easier to use it as international unit of measure.
That makes comparisons between assets... countries... time periods... easier.
That means nothing.



even hard currency is valued everywhere using the fiat currency of the same dollar or euro;

That's not true.

Did you ever heard about the gold/silver ratio?
It values gold in silver - and conversely, silver in gold.
It shows how much gold do you need in order to buy a gram (or an ounce... a kilogram... a ton...) of silver.
It shows how much silver do you need in order to buy a gram (or ...) of gold.

There are precious metals traders that use the gold/silver ratio, not the gold/fiat currency ratio in order to trade gold vs silver.

The unit of measure that people use in order to value something is meaningless.
You can chose any unit of measure that fits your purpose.



there is no difference in supporting a stable coin with gold or directly directly with dollars or euros

Of course there is a difference

A stablecoin representing 1 US dollar loses purchasing power just like 1 USD does.
A SC representing 1 CHF loses PP just like 1 CHF does.
Since CHF is a currency harder than USD, the SC representing 1 CHF loses less PP than the SC representing 1 USD.
Big difference!

A SC representing 1 apple loses (or gains) PP just like 1 apple does:
if that apple is more valuable tomorrow (e.g. today you can exchange it for 1 banana, tomorrow for 2 bananas), the stablecoin representing that apple has gained purchasing power.

A stablecoin representing 1 gram of gold loses (or gains) purchasing power just like 1 gram of gold does.


Compare how much purchasing power 1 USD has lost in the last 20... 50... 100... years... with how much purchasing power 1 gram of gold has lost (or gained) in the same period of time
Big difference!

6
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Accepting Stablecoins for Big-Ticket Items?
« on: April 25, 2024, 10:58:00 AM »
Yes I have looked a bit at USDT (very interesting now when transactions can be done on telegram)

Buenos días Daiana

apparently USDT has issues in Canada

By the way Tether was repressed in Canada last year, for example coinbase and others removed the possibility to trade in pairs with USDT. By the way, is there anyone who lives in Canada, how has it affected your trading, since a year is coming up?
It's very scary that Canada prohibits trading USDT, I don't understand where the error lies with USDT in Canada.
Including large markets such as Coinbase which prohibits USDT trading in Canada, perhaps other members have a better understanding of this issue.
Or maybe there are members on altcoinstalks who are originally from Canada, why does this problem occur.


... it's going to have issues in EU

OP you seem to be very knowledgeable about this project. Please let me ask, if you're ever European too, do you know if Kinesis stablecoins will be impacted by the ongoing MiCA regulation?
One of its objectives is to regulate stablecoins in the EU and, in the long term I believe, to favor the digital euro over other $tablecoins. For example, USDT should be banned in the EU from June 30. I wonder whether Europeans will still have access to the services/stablecoins we're talking about in this topic, in the short/medium term.


... their - regulated - competitors are pushing the US authorities to go after them...


Daiana... for those who are trying to avoid risk... USDT currently... is a Russian roulette!
 :D

7
Ethereum Forum / Re: 8 ETH ETFs coming online this summer (poll)
« on: April 25, 2024, 10:27:43 AM »
Finally, China, a very firm country, can provide a statement to accept Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF, which is very good information. A bullrun might happen soon because with very strong support conditions like this, Bitcoin and Ethereum prices will immediately increase.

30 april!

The first wave of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been officially approved to start trading in Hong Kong on April 30

I think the impact of these HK ETFs should be greater on ETH than on BTC

(since these new ETFs came up, probably I have to change the title of the thread...)

8
I don't suspect they are already tradeable, it'll probably take at least a day or two.

30 April!
 :D


The first wave of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been officially approved to start trading in Hong Kong on April 30.

Unlike the cash-creation model of the United States spot Bitcoin ETFs, Hong Kong aims to offer in-kind creation models for ETFs that enable the creation of new ETF shares by using BTC and ETH.

Hong Kong’s in-kind ETF creation model could be a significant opportunity to considerably increase assets under management (AUM) and trading volume for these products, according to a research note by Bloomberg ETF analyst Rebecca Sin, shared in a March 26 X post by Eric Balchunas:

“Hong Kong is aiming for in-kind creation of the ETF, unlike the US, where the transaction is cash only — in the US, it’s cash in, Bitcoin ETF out, while Hong Kong aims for Bitcoin in, ETF out. This could be an opportunity for the market.”

zerohedge.com

9
Interesting theory, although I find it hard to believe that the spot ETFs had nothing to do with the rise in the price of BTC considering that they bought over 500 000 BTC in the last three months. It's true that more than half of those BTC just flowed from Grayscale mainly to BlackRock, but it still doesn't seem logical to me that Chinese investors get all the credit.

Yes, maybe the point of the article was not "BTC ETFs have no bearing" but rather "Capital outflows from China have a bearing too"


Something I don't understand.
What is the cause of those outflows?
The article identify 2:
a) devaluation of the Yuan (= Yuan losing power vs other currencies, so people try to save into those currencies)
b) capital controls by the authorities

Ok, but the two don't necessarily go hand in hand. There can be the one without the other.
So which one is the main cause for those capital outflows?

10
What The Rising Gold Price Signals (Spoiler Alert: Nothing Good)


While commentators have focused on gold’s spectacular price rise, there is an underlying issue that is also taking place.  The record setting gold price is signaling that the present fiat monetary order, which is based on the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, is coming to a financially unpleasant end.

Ever since 1971, when the Nixon Administration closed the “gold window,” refusing to redeem gold for dollars held by foreign central banks, the world has been on a “dollar standard” where bank reserves are held in Greenbacks.

If the Fed continues to print dollars to sustain government spending at this rate, the dollar will continue to lose purchasing power and foreigners will no longer want to hold them.  Foreign central banks will then turn to gold.  In fact, central banks are already increasing their positions in gold which has been a catalyst that has fueled the latest rally.

Not surprisingly, the Fed has not purchased much gold (or is not admitting publicly that it has) since it would be a bad look for the issuer of the world’s reserve currency to be abandoning its own currency for gold.

Besides the severe financial implications if the dollar is dethroned, there will be dramatic geopolitical repercussions from the loss of its hegemony.  Just like the British pound was replaced as the dominant world currency after England insanely exhausted itself in fighting WWII and ending its empire, America will face a similar future when the dollar becomes just another money.  Many will see it as a “blessing” if and when the U.S. Empire comes to an end.

While it would appear logical and morally sound to replace the present crumbling monetary order with one based on gold and silver, a far worse paradigm than even the present one is, no doubt, being planned.

The new system will be one of central bank digital currency (CBDC) which would give governments and bankers the power to monitor and control all aspects of economic and social life.

zerohedge.com

11
According to Zerohedge, BTC surged not because of previous halving or the introduction of BTC ETFs in January etc... It was primarily due to capital outflowing from China.
So that if you want to know whether BTC will go up or down you should look at China's capital outflows figures.

This is the article



October 2023:

..........



And while conventional wisdom is that this surge in the price of the digital currency was largely due to the January launch of Bitcoin ETFs, what many missed was a Reuters story in January which confirmed that ... it is China's massive wall of inert capital that has been the biggest driver of bitcoin moves, and never more so than during periods of FX and capital outflows which usually precede some form of capital controls.

This was the Reuters story:






We hope that we don't have to remind readers that the first big trigger for bitcoin's unprecedented eruption higher starting in 2015 was - you guessed it - China's August 2015 FX devaluation*



*FX = forex
FX devaluation = devaluation of the RMB/Yuan



We bring all this up because six months after our first correct prediction that China's spike in FX outflows would send bitcoin surging, it's time to do it again.

So don't be surprised if in the next 6 months Bitcoin doubles again, and the move has nothing to do with ETF inflows, the halving, or frankly anything else taking place in the US... and instead is entirely driven by China's massive wall of money which at last check was almost 3x bigger than the US.


12
~snip~
This is called Leveraging the international section of the forum
;D


I wonder if there are any Chinese people on the forum who could answer that question? Still, it's worth a try - maybe one of the 1.5 billion Chinese will show up and answer :)

However, in the article linked by @TomPluz, it seems that there is not much doubt about whether (at least for now) Chinese from China will be able to invest in approved crypto ETFs.

Quote
“A lot of people are banking on wealthy Chinese locals, but, officially, you cannot buy this ETF if you're a mainland Chinese investor,” said Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg. That’s because it must be listed on something called the Stock Connect, which allows Chinese citizens to invest in certain Hong Kong ETFs, and vice versa.
“This will never be available there,” says Balchunas.

... looks like our Chinese forum friends aren't better than us
:D

13
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Kinesis Stablecoins
« on: April 23, 2024, 10:13:04 PM »
OP you seem to be very knowledgeable about this project. Please let me ask, if you're ever European too, do you know if Kinesis stablecoins will be impacted by the ongoing MiCA regulation?
One of its objectives is to regulate stablecoins in the EU and, in the long term I believe, to favor the digital euro over other $tablecoins. For example, USDT should be banned in the EU from June 30. I wonder whether Europeans will still have access to the services/stablecoins we're talking about in this topic, in the short/medium term.





FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD FROM A NON-OP USER!
 ;D



MICA
Kinesis has grown slowly, the main reason is that they have been trying to copy with all different regulations - present and future - around the world.
For example, 6 years ago when they made their ITO in order to raise capital, they decided to not sell their KVT in the USA in order to avoid possible issues with the regulators.
They have a partnership with the Indonesian government, and they aim to do other partnerships with public entities.
Of course a condition for any public entity to do business with you is that your track record of following regulations - all around the world - must be impeccable.

That said, will Kinesis be impacted by the MICA regulations?
I don't know.
Do MICA regulations concern precious metals?
As Kinesis currencies are gold and silver, maybe not. Maybe they are considered just as commodities.
But gold and silver are also currencies, so maybe yes.

To be honest I asked it on X, replying to a post of BIS (Bank for International Settlement) that was mentioning MICA, but of course I got no response  :D

14
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Does a legit Silver backed stablecoin exists?
« on: April 23, 2024, 09:42:57 PM »
--snip--

Thank you very much for your reply and for all these details.

The project does indeed look solid and serious, looks very interesting. I'll take a little more time to read your dedicated topic, and to check where I can swap KAG without KYC (if it's possible of course).

Audits are reassuring.

I'm looking more for gold/silver stablecoins to diversify my portfolio on the long term (trying being less a BTC/XMR "maxi"); not so much for day-to-day spending, although that is indeed a great idea.

Hi paid
unlike ETFs, Kinesis offer regular audits and they don't require neither storage nor management fees.
The Kinesis card is also an advantage compared to ETF: you can use your gold and silver in order to pay everywhere Mastercard is accepted.


KYC:
Following regulations today is a condition for adoption of any currencies, that means KYC, AML etc.
So in order to open a Kinesis account KYC is needed


... unless of course you opt for the Stand-alone Wallet  :D

"What is the purpose of the stand-alone wallet:
The purpose of the stand-alone wallet is predominantly aimed at users who are interested in interacting with the Kinesis system and its currencies without having to participate in KYC verification, maintaining complete anonymity.
What are the restrictions of using Kinesis Stand-alone wallet:
The stand-alone wallet can only hold KAU and KAG, not KVTs, or any other cryptocurrency.
Additionally, users who store their Kinesis currencies in the stand-alone wallet are not eligible for any of the various Fee Sharing Yields on offer."

I have no idea how this Stand-alone wallet works...

15
Stable Coins Forum / Re: Accepting Stablecoins for Big-Ticket Items?
« on: April 23, 2024, 09:21:23 PM »
Yes, don't want to have any funds frozen. Bitcoin can go up but also down of course, since I need the money for the boat to buy another home I'm not willing to gamble too much.

Hola Daiana
si tu lengua madre es castillano, según mi teoría vienes de Argentina!  :D


Funds frozen:
if you don't want funds frozen, the first thing to do is not to buy assets of a company that isn't regulated.
Because authorities can block those assets anytime, using as justification the fact that that company isn't following the rules (AML, KYC etc.)
Tether isn't regulated - at least in the USA (where they keep all their reserves)


Bitcoin:
you said that you want to avoid volatility i.e. risk, so forget BTC


USDT:
USDT is backed by multiple financial assets
The value of those assets can decrease (or crash)
If someone is trying to avoid risks, USDT is not the best choice.


USDT:
If you want to avoid risks, stay away from companies that don't let the assets backing their coins be audited
Tether don't let their reserves be audited


USDT:
If you are a trader and want to park your money short term, waiting for the next train, that's ok.
But if you want to save a big chunk of money, buying a coin whose value is pegged to a weak currency like the USD isn't smart.
(Particularly when there are coins pegged to harder currencies out there)

Look how much purchasing power the USD has lost in the last 20 years



If 20 years ago you had sold your boat in order to buy a house, and you had put the proceeds in something like USDT, today you could buy only an apartment.

USDT is a stablecoin, but it's not a stable coin.
It's a stablecoin only by name.
A stablecoin is a coin that doesn't loose purchasing power.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 52
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod