Bounty hunters vs Investors, which of them causes a decline in token prices?

[Elizabeth]

Bounty hunters can easily wait for the period of Ath coins, but investors want to sell everything very quickly and earn.

[KYB40]

Investors have a greater effect on lowering the price of a new token, which first appears on the stock exchange. Many investors buy new tokens at a 50 percent discount and immediately sell them at the ICO price as soon as they appear on the exchange. Profit is 200 percent.
Headhunters here have a more modest influence. They get for their work only a few percent of tokens produced - from 0.5 to 5 percent. When new tokens fall into their wallets, new tokens have long been traded on the stock exchange and have fallen in price. Therefore, they can not greatly influence the price reduction of the token.

Yes, they usually have more tokens compared to bounty hunters. The bigger volume on sell orders comes from them

[PreshB]

For  me  I  think  is  the  investors  in  the  sense  that  when  they  refuses  to  invest  definitely  there  must  be  stagnation  and  decline  in  token  price  will  occur.

[this-website-is-bitch]

Neither of them can cause huge decline I think.

[Niteroy]

The problem of falling prices of tokens of any project is that the project team does not take any action to maintain the price of the demand of its token at a high level, does not help him not to fall in price. There are projects whose teams are developing a strategy to support the price of their token on the stock exchange and this suggests that the team is thinking about investors and about the future of their token.