~snip~
anyway both for me is just a pump and dump project so securing our funds must not be in these 2.

Considering that it is the first cryptocurrency that I have come into contact with, I can say that it has some kind of sentimental value for me. From the time when 1000 Doge was worth $0.14 to the fact that today 1 Doge is worth even more than that, even 10 years have passed.

I accumulated a lot of them on faucets and never sold them, so I think they are worth a lot today. Unlike most coins from that period that disappeared, Doge obviously has a lot of support from the community and that certainly means something.

If you hear someone saying that, they are probably referring to the design of a physical Bitcoin coin, not the technology itself. I mean, why would anybody say that about a bunch of code? That would be very weird for sure.

Maybe you're right, but still a lot of people have very emotional feelings when it comes to Bitcoin - I've read hundreds of such stories over the years on BTT. I think it's not about code or physical coins, but about the fact that people have created some kind of emotional connection with something that logically shouldn't have.

In any case, Bitcoin is a beautiful creation of one man (let's assume that Satoshi is one person) who wanted to offer the world an alternative to the existing system. However, everyone has the choice to choose what they like best.

Quote from: Lucius on May 18, 2024, 04:44:33 PM

BTT has a very large gambling community, but I would not say that it is a gambling forum, regardless of the fact that that part of the forum is quite active.

I think that approximately 50% of the activity on BTT is carried out by the gambling section. In the end, there are 20 gambling signature campaigns and only one that is not from the gambling industry.

It is true that gambling campaigns dominate BTT, but there are still quality discussions in other parts of the forum. What is positive is that not all managers require a certain number of posts in Gambling boards, so there is much more freedom, at least as far as that is concerned.

The fact is that at least a few gambling campaigns on this forum would mean a lot in the sense that it would increase the activity which, realistically speaking, had already started to decline when the number of sig campaigns was reduced.

With $300 per week, the casino here can get 10 users in the campaign. Almost enough to dominate the forum, at least as far as gamblers are concerned
That's only enough for 3 slightly better posters on BTT.

My personal opinion is that campaigns should not go with such low pay rates, because it will not attract quality posters. Of course, some at BTT also have the criterion that quantity plays a more decisive role than quality, but I would not agree with that.

Honestly, even if I knew that that coin would increase its price several times in the coming months, I would not have decided on such an investment. Regardless of the possible profit, I have always tried not to support anything that I disagree with and that I do not believe in.

I don't like Trump as a person, and everything he did in the past while he was president (and before that) speaks volumes about the kind of man he is. I'm not from the US and it doesn't matter to me whether the Democrat or Republican candidate wins, but I wouldn't support any project that this man is behind.

Some people are constantly speculating that one day ETH will surpass BTC in some way, and they probably mean that it will be worth more than BTC. Personally, this is quite unrealistic considering that ETH has about six times more coins in circulation than BTC, and that, as far as I know, it still does not have a clearly defined max supply. The thing that pushed ETH even more to the side is the transition to POS, which in my opinion makes it less attractive than before.

Furthermore, ETH's absolute ATH was in 2021 and was $4891, and if we take into account that BTC then and today is approximately at the same value in relation to USD, then we see that it is a difference of almost $2000 in a negative sense.

The price of ETH is therefore a reflection of the market's confidence in it, and everything else is less important.

Don't bother creating an ANN thread if you're just going to silently close shop within a week.

People often think they know what they are getting into, but in a very short time they realize that it is simply not something that can work. We can only guess what happened, but creating an ANN is something that has logic when you start work, no matter how it ends.

13 years ago? I don't understand what you're trying to say. The concept of modern mixers did not exist in 2011.

It occurred to me that this refers to the OP's last activity, but the profile shows that it was May 13 - so @hugeblack confused things a bit, probably thinking about that information.

~snip~
Although honestly, is it necessary to turn another crypto forum into a gambling forum?

BTT has a very large gambling community, but I would not say that it is a gambling forum, regardless of the fact that that part of the forum is quite active. The fact is that at least a few gambling campaigns on this forum would mean a lot in the sense that it would increase the activity which, realistically speaking, had already started to decline when the number of sig campaigns was reduced.

At first glance, this seems to be positive news, although I wonder if the authorities of any US state can make such decisions without fear that the federal authorities will try to challenge them in some way? Theoretically, it could happen that every federal state in the US has its own laws when it comes to cryptocurrencies, such as the case with the legalization of marijuana, which is completely legal in some states and strictly prohibited in others.

It is also somewhat paradoxical that the state passes a law enabling something that functions without legal approval from the very beginning.