That is one strange choice for naming bitcoin mixer, but it is more important how mixer actually work than domain name.
Hi dkbit98, I agree with you, it's a strange name, I couldn't think of anything better that day. but I found it funny and original and finally I decided to register it.
Before doing any mixing I suggest you should read SwampLizard disclaimer page with terms of use, I don't remember of noticing anything similar on other mixers:
Boilerplate ToS to try to distance themselves from US and EU AML laws. Whir.to does that too, but I don't think these people are actually enforcing any of these restrictions unlike say Ginger Wallet.
Regarding the terms of use, I wrote them taking as a reference the ToS texts of already existing mixers like yomix, thormixer and mixtum. But I plan to rewrite and adjust the text.
swamplizard design is very similar to thormixer.
The only difference in the design is the background color is black rest looks exactly similar to Thormixer. I do like the minimalistic approach and the black background. I had earlier disabled the JS but again enabled it because I like the graphics that should up when the mouse moves on the screen. I then changed the language to Hindi and found the translation to be good. Overall a good design and approach by the team that is behind the mixer.
Hello. yes, I have taken as a reference some parts of thormixer.io and mixer.money like the form and the comparison table, well, and some other things about their HTML and CSS, the part that makes tab changes with CSS instead of JS I learned to do it by studying their code. I hope they don't get angry, I thought their layout was the best and simplest. Thanks and sorry for this.
Does anyone else have this happen when they try to turn off the JS through the button on the top of the page?
Well this is a problem, because it seems that Chrome interprets the change as a threat, I guess because Chrome is not very permissive with the experimental JS options. Other browsers like Firefox are not so restrictive.
The problem is not an error in the JS code, it is a security measure of Chrome since it detects the action of deactivating or activating JS from the web and interprets it as harmful. It does not happen to all Chrome users but even so, I dont like that red notice at all and the only way to avoid it is with a version without JS.
The only option is remove the background selector and the particle effect, and offer by default the version without JS with a black background and without particle effect. What do you think guys? Should I modify it, without JS, background effects… ?