is there need to get disturbed over karma?

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

@OP, I once read a comment where jokers once said some numbers of karma is actually required to achieve a certain rank on the forum but I don't think that the rank requires karma is the legendary rank. If you look around, you will discover that their are different ranks, badges and positions after the legendary rank, which I believe that it's some of those ranks that actually requires the number of karma an individual have.

Also, do you know what I think? It has been known that karma is given to individuals that make quality post, so I believe than in the future, campaign managers may also start to use the karma as a criteria of selecting usser into their campaign because they may believe that only the users that are earning karma are the most quality posters.

[enwi]

@OP, I once read a comment where jokers once said some numbers of karma is actually required to achieve a certain rank on the forum but I don't think that the rank requires karma is the legendary rank. If you look around, you will discover that their are different ranks, badges and positions after the legendary rank, which I believe that it's some of those ranks that actually requires the number of karma an individual have.

Also, do you know what I think? It has been known that karma is given to individuals that make quality post, so I believe than in the future, campaign managers may also start to use the karma as a criteria of selecting usser into their campaign because they may believe that only the users that are earning karma are the most quality posters.

Agree, having a stricter karma distribution system will ensure users continue to provide quality and useful posts for those who read. Karma is currently being considered for many things, so we have to keep trying to get karma in a good and correct way.