New projects are just for Raising Funds..

[Fenix]

I hope that the new project can provide many good developments because until now there are still many new projects that do scams so that by manipulating the total amount of funds collected will make the project look successful.

Yeah, new projects are scam and manipulate the total amount of fund.
At the beginning their tokens are worthed, be But after they collect funds, we will see the token price will dump.
Several of them are Rug and worthless.

There have always been, are and will be various projects on the cryptocurrency market, both useful and useless, and even fraudulent. A large number of people are trying to make money in this market. The lack of regulation, free access, relative anonymity attracts not only people who are trying to improve this market, but also all sorts of scammers. But you can not say that they are all fraudulent.

[mahadev]

I think I agree with this.
New projects are just raising the fund, It's normal in crypto development.
But half of them also have good projects and team.
We can invest on those.

[Jaephoenix]

Many projects, especially game related projects are simply pump and dumps. Sometimes the team and devs are included in the scam. They are supposed to have vested tokens, but due to some of them masquerading as investors or a poorly audited smart contracts, they end up with huge bags of the token and thus dump it quite hugely

[zilzylian]

I think Investors should be smarter to choose coins in investing, that's why Bitcoin has a lot of trust because this project is really good even though it was abandoned by community members, I can't interpret what happens after tokens are listed on CEX, but if they have exchange partners in the top 5 list, I believe the project will run well because it has good liquidity.

[Speaker]

there were many examples when a coin was traded on top-level exchanges, and then it became a scam.This does not apply to bitcoin, at least there have been no precedents for many years.

[Kaplusha0]

The main indicator that a project is not pumped full of bots is to see what kind of community it has. If it is active, it means that people believe in the project and it is likely to be an interesting one.
I can tell you about one example, the Amulet Protocol project. It's a project I'm in right now, first of all it's a very promising and fundamental project, second it has a very active community and no bots.
Amulet Protocol, it is a decentralized risk protection protocol for the Rust-based ecosystem.
The project is developing rapidly, I suggest you take a closer look.

[Callisto]

Here I agree with you, therefore all crypto investors merge all their assets immediately after listing, there are very few projects that have really launched for a long project period and they have at least some goals and project manufacturability, but such projects can be counted on the fingers to great regret.

[pelana vreo]

from past few months i noticed that 99% of new projects pump in their starting days but i know thats a bot trading . after raising funds and collect huge money they announcing about list there project in new exchanges and start real trading then all investors who bought the coins at the price of for example 0.25 in pre-sale and want to sell on 1$ . then what happens i think we all know whats next .

New projects usually give you the option of staking and holding, so you will get additional tokens from the staking you do with the APY that corresponds to the tokenomic created.
So when a project registers a new project on the Cex exchange, then the team doesn't worry about dumps, because everything is set up to avoid any unwanted things.

[bitcoin-shark]

unfortunately you are right but it is a question that started a long time ago not only now a good percentage of the new projects that come out on the market do so with the sole purpose of raising funds unfortunately the projects that have a purpose, a utility on the market, a real one roadmaps behind are very few so we have to choose carefully on what to invest, do our own thorough research first

[Jaephoenix]

It's the regular norm now in crypto. In fact some crypto projects have a specific niche where they do such soft scams and bleed investors. This is why crypto seriously needs some regulative hands to guide it, now that mainstream investors are taking notice

[alltalk]

It's the regular norm now in crypto. In fact some crypto projects have a specific niche where they do such soft scams and bleed investors. This is why crypto seriously needs some regulative hands to guide it, now that mainstream investors are taking notice

Indeed, in fact, many new projects don't focus on project development after the token sale. But only focus on how rising the funds and let it be. They even don't concern about how the condition of their own investors.I agree that this is likely a soft scam type.
But, we also know that there is no organization to regulate the new project. Because most of them are decentralized. That is why many scams are still around here

[Senin]

There are already more than 21,000 different cryptocurrencies on the cryptocurrency market, and of course, a significant part of them are useless or fraudulent. But this is how this market can develop. Out of dozens, maybe hundreds of projects, only a few contribute something useful and the cryptocurrency develops further. Potential investors simply need to carefully consider which cryptocurrency to invest in. Then we will not be so often disappointed.

[Bobcrypto]

from past few months i noticed that 99% of new projects pump in their starting days but i know thats a bot trading . after raising funds and collect huge money they announcing about list there project in new exchanges and start real trading then all investors who bought the coins at the price of for example 0.25 in pre-sale and want to sell on 1$ . then what happens i think we all know whats next .

Many of us have taken notice of some new startup project developments especially on the area of listing coin/token after token sales. There is no doubt about certain projects team that had successful collected investors funds at pre-sale on some price renge with promises that project will go to moon. Unfortunately, many of these projects ended up listing their coins even below pre-sale  prices.
Just imagine buying a coin on pre-sale at $0.006, for instance, and projects listed the said token after 3years below the pre-sale, coin listed at $0.001 and they informed investors that project has a long term plans of developments. I think this is selfish, greedy, and it is another form of fraudulent act that must be rejected by all. Thank you.

[Speaker]

Yes, the market that was before made its own adjustments.Projects have become greedy for fundraising and token distribution time.I think that now, using the same categories, we have projects that enter the market and cost many times less than during the sale.