links got abused by forum bots, will see in the future

It's an interesting idea, maybe it should be enabled only by higher-ranked members. Thus, they would avoid the mass creation of accounts for this purpose.

I'm not sure if this is a new feature of MixTum, I thought I knew MixTum has supported it for a long time or maybe I've seen this feature on some Mixer services.

It's not a new feature, I remember it from at least a year ago. I don't know when it has been present, Mixtum has existed since 2018 and there have certainly been a lot of upgrades in the meantime.
It certainly makes Mixtum more unique compared to other competing services.


However, Mixtum has the option of free testing https://mixtum.io/?mix=free
It is possible to mix Bitcoin for testing purposes, commission-free, the amount must be exactly 0.001 BTC
Now is a good time for that, because the network fee is also low 8-11 sat/vB

Samurai and Wasabi have abandoned users in the US crypto market,

Samurai is seized and developers are arrested, while Wasabi disables the Coinjoin feature. They didn't abandon anyone, they were pressured by the US government.

At present, I cannot access joinmarket.net and only receive the message "This account has been suspended". I am not sure what happened to this service

Now it is also unavailable for me, strange. There is another message that the server is overused or the allowed limit has been exceeded. I hope that's the only issue because at some point the site will be available again

Either the domain has been overused, or the reseller ran out of resources.

Mixtum should add more information about fees on Precise Payment Mode page, but I guess it's just their standard fees 4% - 5% + 0.0007 BTC.

Probably 4%-5% + 2x 0.0007 BTC, because there are two deposit addresses in question

This is a new feature that I have never heard of anywhere else.

However,  I don't really get what is really different from adding the payment address as the destination  address in a normal mix. Maybe the change feature? But you could just add a second destination address anyway

The advantage is that one transaction can be in a precise amount, while the rest goes to another address (after service and network fee).

I think it's a great idea! It allows us to pay someone directly while limiting fees (it removes one transaction compared to mixing/receiving of funds + sending to X) and, above all, it prevents the recipient from knowing your BTC address/funds, which I really like, with the certainty that the coins won't be frozen thanks to the way Jambler works. A great way to spend your signature campaign sats if you want to pay for online services, for example

It is certainly a good function, although I did not find anything about how much the fee is in this case. I assume that it is like in the case of sending to two addresses with the choice that in such a transaction we have a "change" address.

BTT has a very large gambling community, but I would not say that it is a gambling forum, regardless of the fact that that part of the forum is quite active.

I think that approximately 50% of the activity on BTT is carried out by the gambling section. In the end, there are 20 gambling signature campaigns and only one that is not from the gambling industry.

The fact is that at least a few gambling campaigns on this forum would mean a lot in the sense that it would increase the activity which, realistically speaking, had already started to decline when the number of sig campaigns was reduced.

With $300 per week, the casino here can get 10 users in the campaign. Almost enough to dominate the forum, at least as far as gamblers are concerned
That's only enough for 3 slightly better posters on BTT.

I haven't used Joinmarket.net personally but I can surely say that you should be careful from it because it's not worth it to go after a platforms whose domain name isn't a good one. I would never go for that one even if it become the last option for us.

Have you ever heard of Joinmarket until now?
Why do you think that Joinmarket.net is a bad domain and how exactly does it have a bad effect on the seriousness of the project?
Do you know that Joinmarket was first mentioned on bitcointalk in 2015? 9 years ago. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919116.msg10096563

I opened this topic to maybe start a discussion and get some personal experiences if possible. Guessing and wrong assumptions are certainly not helpful.

I noticed some famous faces, who are the most active in the gambling board on Btt. Why don't any of them start gambling topics, or contests similar to those on Btt?
If you want to attract casinos to be present here and possibly contribute to the promotion, a certain user base must be created.

Although honestly, is it necessary to turn another crypto forum into a gambling forum?