follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sukanyadee

Pages: [1]
1
Sorting Box / Re: Is crypto still a future currency?
« on: July 19, 2019, 05:19:18 PM »
Crypto is definitely going to be the future
so many MNC's are already adapting to it countries are making crypto legal

for new bees i would suggest to trade on demo.digitalticks.com
as Digital Ticks Exchange has a demo trading platform where you can trade without using real money..
So one can practice as much as they can till they familiarize themselves with how an exchange can work.. or navigate

2
Bitcoin would be someone with too much of swag.. and "like a boss" kind of a attitude probably

3
Thats true .. but after these incidents people are losing their faith and trust in the exchange

4
Exactly .. i have lost my trust in binance too
on Saturday the entire exchange shut down due to a disk failure..
i mean they dint even give any prior notice and suddenly shut down for maintenance

5
General Discussion / Re: China's attitude towards cryptocurrencies
« on: June 05, 2019, 11:23:12 AM »
came across this article
Will China take a step back when it comes to cryptocurrency
China’s Economic Planning Body Label Bitcoin mining an ‘undesirable’ industry

China has a significant number of miners and crypto enthusiasts and before the banning for circulation of the virtual currencies, it used to be the leader among the world’s countries when it comes to the volume of crypto trading. The people of China were the first who became interested in these virtual currencies. Hundreds of mining farms aroused in the country before it introduced the restrictions on token sales. In February 2018, China decided to remove all the inland or coastal platforms related to virtual currency trading or ICOs in order to prevent financial risks.But both crypto trading and ICOs were not totally withdrawn from China even after the official ban on it.

After shutting down the domestic virtual currency exchanges, all the traders ran towards the overseas platforms and continued trading cryptocurrencies. But the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) had also tightened the regulations on these domestic investors’ participation in all those overseas transactions of ICOs and virtual currencies. In spite of all these ICOs and Blockchain projects were banned, somehow the country still holds the position of being the capital of global cryptocurrency mining. That is why the Chinese government now wants to phase out China’s vast Bitcoin and cryptocurrency mining sector.

Read more on:  https://medium.com/digital-ticks/will-china-take-a-step-back-when-it-comes-to-cryptocurrency-6537cc123549

6
Are people still trading on Binance after the hack? how trust worthy is the exchange still going to be

7
I doubt how secured will it be

8
Updates around twitter say that the "Hack" was a hoax. It never happened. The reality is that it was an inside job: only admins or staff have to permission to move funds! It was a move to funnel coins (BTC) from staffer's account to another.

9
Cryptocurrency discussions / Re: Is ICO investment still worth it?
« on: May 25, 2019, 09:18:24 AM »
IEO are replacing ICO now a days though.. as it is more secured

10
Bitcoin Forum / Re: Invest in Bitcoin or Bank?
« on: May 24, 2019, 11:30:09 AM »
Invest in bitcoin but the risk is higher than banks obviously
but more the risk..greater is the profit

11
If Binance said  it's a phishing attack then how did the hackers bypass 2fa? How did they bypass IP address locking/validation? How did they bypass the withdrawal email confirmation? Seems more likely to me that Binance had a vulnerability they don't want to admit to, because it's easier to blame users if it was a "phishing attack" and looks better to the public if it's "not their fault". If it was really a phishing attack then why would they even cover the loss to begin with? It's user’s responsibility at that point. None of this adds up”

12
Did they accidentally burn $40 million in segwit migration?

Pages: [1]
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod