Should we limit members in one campaign?

[bosshyip]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

[natmuller68]

Hi bosshyip,

I think its a good idea to limit members in a campaign, you just said that, we got less because there is to many people in.

[sugarchrisp]

I think it should be left up to the discretion of whoever is running the campaign, or whoever is paying for it really.  If they wants tons of people promoting, and people are willing to do it and share a smaller stack, let them.  This is basic supply and demand imo, good projects get lots of people regardless.

[altcoingamer]

Its an interesting question.. I think it shouldn't be limited but can see the benefits of it being limited.  I'll have to think on this subject over a couple of days and see if  I can brainstorm some pluses or minuses to this and will post more if I can think of anything... really like the proposed question though.

[Carat]

I agree that many members of the company do not always give good results. Sometimes it's better to limit the participants not by quantity, but by the quality of Facebook accounts and Twitter with a lot of friends and followers

[dentolas]

it depends on the manager and devs... i would agree to establish a limit but also understand if they want as many people as possible promoting their project... concerning bounty hunters they just have to do the math and check if it is worth it or not, instead of blindly joining every bounty in sight

[kurapika]

it depends on the manager and devs... i would agree to establish a limit but also understand if they want as many people as possible promoting their project... concerning bounty hunters they just have to do the math and check if it is worth it or not, instead of blindly joining every bounty in sight

I agree on you mate, no need to join if it's already crowded. You need to respect those who join earlier and find other bounty that will give you more reward. Those developers wants many people to promote their projects and they have their rules.

[BlackWidow]

I saw a bounty campaign where the pool of reward varied depending on the number of participants.

[korkorjkk]

That will be a good idea because I have participated in some campaigns with limited number of the people and the returns turn out to be very huge as compared to those with large numbers. Limiting the number of participants also reduces spam.

[husanchaika]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Limiting the number of participants is good for bounty hunters, not managers or team. Thus, they don't really need it. But, some kind of bounties, as signature, translation and content creation are limited by the market itself, and usually these sections contain high budget allocations, making contributing to these sections very rewarding and promising.
Although there are campaigns that limit its member quantity for some level.

[natmuller68]

Hi,

i just want to say something more, check this bounty https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=33209.0,

they have limited members in their campaign signature so the rait/paid in tokens is more higger.

[husanchaika]

Hi,

i just want to say something more, check this bounty https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=33209.0,

they have limited members in their campaign signature so the rait/paid in tokens is more higger.

it's good when a project is limiting it's members, the ones who promote the project will do it more willingly because they know they will be paid much more than if members count was not limited

[Master107]

That is fair enough to distribute the tokens to every participants. Big enough than no limit members.

[Official_BlockFolks]

Hi,

i just want to say something more, check this bounty https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=33209.0,

they have limited members in their campaign signature so the rait/paid in tokens is more higger.

Thanks for highlighting my bounty campaign. And yes, you are right, i am limiting the number of participants so that all the signature participants are able to get good rewards.

[husanchaika]

Hi,

i just want to say something more, check this bounty https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=33209.0,

they have limited members in their campaign signature so the rait/paid in tokens is more higger.

Thanks for highlighting my bounty campaign. And yes, you are right, i am limiting the number of participants so that all the signature participants are able to get good rewards.

Hi! Are you always doing that, I mean limiting number of participants? It is a great way doing bounty business.