Ico project assessment has no effect on sales?

[owmivmen]

I am confused to see this condition. many ico projects that have scores below 4 on the ICO bench are successful in their sales. while there are several projects that have a value of 4 - 4.8 More who fail or delay their sales due to the poor results of their pre ico. how do you think? do I have to trust the ico project appraiser site?

[comer]

please cite example buddy! i cant figure it out what your saying, as many investors relying from the ico review scores. citing there scores as irrelevant to the success of the project, would somehow gives bad impression to ico reviewer.

[Breadwinner]

I have seen so many situations where they rated an ICO and it became successful and the same way they also rated some projects and it was a scam so me I don't really believe these ratings and assessments.

[owmivmen]

please cite example buddy! i cant figure it out what your saying, as many investors relying from the ico review scores. citing there scores as irrelevant to the success of the project, would somehow gives bad impression to ico reviewer.

As I see it, the ico project that I think is bad in terms of team and advisor, they can pay on the appraisal site. for premium fees with a guaranteed 4+ value of 0.1 - 0.5 btc. Good ico projects prefer to register their projects by not using the fees to register their projects (free). They only rely on the team and advisor according to the value on the appraiser's site. That's what makes a lot of projects that I think are normal to get high scores. This is only my opinion.

[owmivmen]

I have seen so many situations where they rated an ICO and it became successful and the same way they also rated some projects and it was a scam so me I don't really believe these ratings and assessments.

Yes ico scam is very easy to pay for 0.5 btc for a high value. They will get enthusiasts and money that exceeds the value of 0.5 btc.

[ayatoslaw]

I myself am confused about this, is the project really good? or the site that gave the wrong ico ranking ,? or indeed investors don't know which projects are good and not?
I myself began to doubt the rating of the site, preferring to look for information myself, it's just very difficult because it requires a lot of time.

[owmivmen]

I myself am confused about this, is the project really good? or the site that gave the wrong ico ranking ,? or indeed investors don't know which projects are good and not?
I myself began to doubt the rating of the site, preferring to look for information myself, it's just very difficult because it requires a lot of time.

As a crypto user, I was fooled by choosing a high-value ico project from an appraisal site. I participated in their bounty program and in the end they decided to stop selling tokens due to failure during the sales period.

[Speaker]

You can look at sites with ratings, but you don't need to trust them completely.The last word in the choice of the project should be yours, not the numbers.

[owmivmen]

You can look at sites with ratings, but you don't need to trust them completely.The last word in the choice of the project should be yours, not the numbers.

Yes knowing and researching ico projects is very important because we will invest in the project. I am not entirely sure of the appraisal site. I only saw the team and advisors from the project.

[levyashin]

I think most of the rating is getting by paying for it.

Like they are getting contacted by ico listing website and getting told that they have a 3.5 rating and if they wish it can become 4.5. So shitty projects getting great ratings and nobody is caring about them.