ICO project assessment

[owmivmen]

In your opinion, among ICO Profile, Team, Vision, and products, which one is the most influential in the outcome of the sale of the ico project? Or can you judge where the ico project can be said to be successful?

[Speaker]

I wonder according to which criteria the project has received such high assessment ? The first time I see such a rating!

[owmivmen]

I wonder according to which criteria the project has received such high assessment ? The first time I see such a rating!

You can see the project at ICOBench. There is no perfect ico project. But if the project wants perfect value, the developer can just spend some money to pay for it.

[Bit]

.snip.

In your opinion, among ICO Profile, Team, Vision, and products, which one is the most influential in the outcome of the sale of the ico project? Or can you judge where the ico project can be said to be successful?

If you ask me, I will answer the ICO profile and its product are the most crucial things for an ICO project. The investors should analyze more in these categories.

[ayatoslaw]

I really don't understand ico who gets a rating, as you said, the ico rating was bad but the sales of the tokens were successful, and there was a good ico rating but the sales of coins were not good.
so what is the cause?
maybe the promotion can be lacking, or the lack of a team in convincing investors to invest there.

[owmivmen]

I really don't understand ico who gets a rating, as you said, the ico rating was bad but the sales of the tokens were successful, and there was a good ico rating but the sales of coins were not good.
so what is the cause?
maybe the promotion can be lacking, or the lack of a team in convincing investors to invest there.

The ICO project I think 50% gets the value from the rating site and 50% of the influence of the project's cost to register the project on the assessment site. The ICO value is obtained based on the quality of the website, the value of the team and advisor, the product and there is an assessment of each of the assessor sites.

[zenbook]

When I was looking for a trustworthy project, I paid attention to these factors: they must have a good whitepaper. They must have MVP on their website, because lots of projects like to write how cool they are, but don't have anything except these pompous words. Their employees should have profiles on Linkedin, for example, cause scammers are revealing their personality and often. Their groups on the social networks are active and not filled with bots and fakes. Also I checked their profile on GitHub. You can check up Cryptics - a forecasting platform which does use 100% AI. Their project does satisfy with all these requirements. And the project trip map is in accordance with the team's performance. ICOs are said to be successful if they reach hardcap.

[alltalk]

If it is not a fake project, I think the most influential to make the project be successful in token sale is the product. People learn how the product will be useful in the future. I am sure that investors won't invest in a project with bad products or products that are potentially unable to develop later.

[bitpation]

I feel the work of the team and the Product Results of a Project that determine whether the Project is a success or not as a project being worked on. This will greatly affect the sales results and can reduce the image of the project if the Team and Products are not good and vice versa.

[owmivmen]

When I was looking for a trustworthy project, I paid attention to these factors: they must have a good whitepaper. They must have MVP on their website, because lots of projects like to write how cool they are, but don't have anything except these pompous words. Their employees should have profiles on Linkedin, for example, cause scammers are revealing their personality and often. Their groups on the social networks are active and not filled with bots and fakes. Also I checked their profile on GitHub. You can check up Cryptics - a forecasting platform which does use 100% AI. Their project does satisfy with all these requirements. And the project trip map is in accordance with the team's performance. ICOs are said to be successful if they reach hardcap.

Yes, it is important to assess a project. starting from the website display, team experience and team profile, White Paper and roadmap. If they have good value in that part, interested people will be interested in investing in their projects.

[owmivmen]

If it is not a fake project, I think the most influential to make the project be successful in token sale is the product. People learn how the product will be useful in the future. I am sure that investors won't invest in a project with bad products or products that are potentially unable to develop later.

So investors only see products? does team and vision have little effect on the success of the ico project? Products are very important to make investors interested but making or developing products requires team experience.

[Cruelmes]

vision and implemention according to me if a project make a simple a realy raly simple way to tell us about their project their project will succes like when you want to promote some think example phone this phone has ram x baterai x can do x . If this happen in project peopple willopen their eyes heart to their project . But i see ico so far they just look doont want to do that i dont understand

[ZionRTZ]

That is hard for me to tell. One reason is that I do not really trust ICO review sites that much since a lot of them are paid.
Granted that the ratings are objective and impartial, the most influential for me would be the product.

[I-Bit]

Actually, all things are influential in the outcome of the sale of the ICO project. Investors will learn all things about the information of an ICO project. However, sometimes it cannot guarantee for the successful of an ICO.

[alltalk]

If it is not a fake project, I think the most influential to make the project be successful in token sale is the product. People learn how the product will be useful in the future. I am sure that investors won't invest in a project with bad products or products that are potentially unable to develop later.

So investors only see products? does team and vision have little effect on the success of the ico project? Products are very important to make investors interested but making or developing products requires team experience.

Learn your question bro! You ask "which one is the most influential". So, I just choose one of them. And In my opinion the most is the product. I think a good team or a good project should make a good product. I have experienced it, usually a good product comes from a good project with a great and solid team.