Quote from: BitMaxz on April 29, 2024, 12:13:52 AM

Sa ngayon wala pang magandang perspective kung aakyat paba ang Bitcoin o hindi pa pero dahil block halving nga dapat talagang umakyat ang price ng Bitcoin.

Ang nakikita ko lang sa pattern ngayon na may posibilidad na bumagsak ang presyo ng Bitcoin around $52k restest at mag babound din ulit pa $60k prediction lang ito dahil na rin sa galaw ng presyo ng Bitcoin at kung mag fail sya sa minor support pero kung hindi possible ang pagbagsak ng presyo nya ay babalik sa around $60K kung mag lalaro lang sya between $62k to $66k base sa galaw nito at sa tulong narin ng fibonacci retracement.

Tignan nyo tong image sa baba.

Patuloy yata correction ni Bitcoin pero base dyan sa chart mukhang aakyat pa nga sya kung walang breakout  na magaganap dyan sa retest trendline na nakaplot pero yeah di ko talaga kabisado mga pangalan ng mga nakalagay sa drawing pero may konting ideya ako sa galaw pero syempre mas nakakatuwa yung drawing ng mga expert sa technical analysis kahit fibonachi di ko sya masyado alam familiar lang ang name.

Back to the topic, I think magandang magbuy dyan sa $50k-$55k if ever na mahit man yan in the next few days or months. Kung titignan naman natin yung trend sa price chart ni Bitcoin kung ilalagay natin sya sa "all" timeframe ay talagang paakyat ang price ni Bitcoin kahit sa 1 year timeframe ay ganun padin nagkaroon lang ng makakihang galaw nung nagbull run sa 4 year cycle yata.

Bumagsak bahagya sa $59k ang Bitcoin, pero ngayon tumaas ulit sa $60k. So sa ngayon, parang hindi pa aabout sa $55k, may support parin tayo sa $60 at iyon ay magandang balita. Pero hindi parin tayo makasiguro kung ma maintain natin ang $60k levels o hindi.

Kahit may good news sa tin katulad ng Hong Kong Spot ETF, wala rin epekto sa market. At ayon sa statistics eh mababa ang volume ng trading nila at obviously may konting bentahan na nangyayari kaya dumadausdus ang presyo sa ngayon.

UniJoin.io's use of CoinJoin to anonymize transactions is interesting. While the single, combined transaction with multiple inputs and outputs makes tracing difficult, it relies on a large user pool for effectiveness.

The article mentions a "Wallet Distribution" option. It would be helpful to understand how this distribution is determined. Does it affect anonymity or simply the number of outputs users receive? Additionally, the emphasis on users storing the "letter of guarantee" raises a question.  Without server-side data storage, how can UniJoin.io handle potential disputes or ensure user confidence in case of lost letters?

Let's also explore the claim of random fees between 1% and 3% with four decimal places. Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

Halving is still important, if bitcoin never had a halving we would not see a bullish season after the halving. When miners' rewards are cut, supply is limited and the price of bitcoin rises. Maybe some people say it doesn't affect him, maybe he doesn't follow the 4 year cycle

Satoshi carefully planned bitcoin well, ranging from ;
The method of securing the network;
The incentive and it's halving;
PoW;
Avoidance of double spending;
And lots more.
Satoshi is a genius. And everything he planned and implemented for bitcoin has one way or the other to affect the bitcoin price and Bitcoin network. We shouldn't underrate the power of halving.

a gambling addict will stop if he is aware of it on his own and cannot be forced if it is not from their heart, even if it is religion and family, if they do not have a strong intention to leave gambling

I fully with you. True change does indeed come from within and gambling is no exception. Its essential that the person has a genuine and strong desire to change. I wholeheartedly agree that self awareness is the cornerstone of meaningful and lasting transformation.

Hey team, this looks like a good project, but I'm surprised I haven't heard about it considering that it launched over five years ago.

I'm reading through the initial post and can't help but notice a couple of claims I'd like some clarification on.

The article claims that the platform "does not shuffle available funds in one or multiple pots, but exchanges incoming bitcoins with coins purchased from investors - cryptocurrency exchanges."

What are those investor cryptocurrency exchanges? Are they regular cryptocurrency exchanges, or are there some special investment vehicles set up for this particular purpose?

Also, regarding your process of mixing coins, you wrote: "Our transfer algorithm selects independent investors and trading platforms, and breaks down your funds in a manner that completely removes a link between input and output transactions. We neither require registration nor store logs. Once the mixing is done and the transaction confirmed, the data on processed transactions is deleted. For each mixing request, we issue a digitally signed letter of guarantee, which confirms our obligations to the client."

How can this be independently verified to give users confidence and trust that coins are properly mixed and cannot be traced?

I see there's a lot of attention on the project and an influx of intending users, so I believe this is a valid question that should be addressed.