Between karma and points which one is better

[Jokers]

Recently, I saw an update where the admin mentioned that currently karma doesn't matter for ranking up.

It is probably so, at least for the lesser ranks, but these things can change on this forum with time. Ranking up requirements today are already not the same they were when I just came here, and they can be changed in the future. So no need paying too much attention to that, just enjoy your communication on the forum, share your ideas and news, stay positive and friendly and you'll get everything: karma, points, ranks, forum tokens, etc.

[Crypto Library]

It is probably so, at least for the lesser ranks, but these things can change on this forum with time. Ranking up requirements today are already not the same they were when I just came here, and they can be changed in the future. So no need paying too much attention to that, just enjoy your communication on the forum, share your ideas and news, stay positive and friendly and you'll get everything: karma, points, ranks, forum tokens, etc.

You are right, I would like to agree with you. I actually mean that the main thing is to focus on the quality of the posts. Now since the ranking can done by only with the post activity, in this case many users will be seen who will only do spamming or like burst posting on bounty campaigns. And I think that there will be no benefit by these kind of ranking up. Quality posts are more important than Karma or earning points. I think quality does matters more than quantity of everything and when the post quality will increase every thing will go up as well as.

[Jokers]

Now since the ranking can done by only with the post activity, in this case many users will be seen who will only do spamming or like burst posting on bounty campaigns. And I think that there will be no benefit by these kind of ranking up. Quality posts are more important than Karma or earning points.

Campaign managers know that ranking up is not so hard on our forum and there's no difference in signature code different ranks can wear, so they pay less attention to the rank and much more attention to other things, and the quality of posts is among the most important. Negative and positive badges forum can give is also important and, as far as I know, campaign managers keep that in mind. For instance negative quality badge holders are already not accepted to some campaigns at all.

[borovichok]

Being active will also make people to reward us with karma. I don't have many karmas, but I think it is good enough to see karma in our profile because of our contribution. I'm sure it won't be difficult to get karma if we are active in this forum.

I'm not sure if this is right, but from what I've heard about the Karma system, it's similar to the merit system, and + Karma is only granted to useful posts, so being active doesn't help much. One could be here for 2-3 years and still struggle to get some, while another could be here for a few weeks and get a lot of + Karmas, so it's all about quality, just as on the other forum. Although the Karma system can be abuse easily given that any high-ranking account is able to give one while not receiving any (I gave out one +Karma while having zero Karma)

[Freemind]

I'm not sure if this is right, but from what I've heard about the Karma system, it's similar to the merit system, and + Karma is only granted to useful posts, so being active doesn't help much. One could be here for 2-3 years and still struggle to get some, while another could be here for a few weeks and get a lot of + Karmas, so it's all about quality, just as on the other forum. Although the Karma system can be abuse easily given that any high-ranking account is able to give one while not receiving any (I gave out one +Karma while having zero Karma)

When a user is active it is supposed to be to contribute quality conversations and opinions, not to do nothing, which is why I don't agree with you 100%.

As for the karma system, it cannot be easily manipulated as you say, since it has restrictions. Each user can only give 1 positive or negative karma to the same user every 10 hours. In case a user receives a lot of negative or positive karma, the administrator will be able to see it in the logs and take necessary action.

[borovichok]

I'm not sure if this is right, but from what I've heard about the Karma system, it's similar to the merit system, and + Karma is only granted to useful posts, so being active doesn't help much. One could be here for 2-3 years and still struggle to get some, while another could be here for a few weeks and get a lot of + Karmas, so it's all about quality, just as on the other forum. Although the Karma system can be abuse easily given that any high-ranking account is able to give one while not receiving any (I gave out one +Karma while having zero Karma)

When a user is active it is supposed to be to contribute quality conversations and opinions, not to do nothing, which is why I don't agree with you 100%.

We're partially saying the same thing here ; Karma is not earned based on activities but quality contributions, if I look around I'm likely going to see active accounts with  bunch of posts and no single positive karma.

As for the karma system, it cannot be easily manipulated as you say, since it has restrictions. Each user can only give 1 positive or negative karma to the same user every 10 hours. In case a user receives a lot of negative or positive karma, the administrator will be able to see it in the logs and take necessary action.

I got abused (Karma)on my first day here and admin came to my rescue. I like.it.

[Freemind]

I'm not sure if this is right, but from what I've heard about the Karma system, it's similar to the merit system, and + Karma is only granted to useful posts, so being active doesn't help much. One could be here for 2-3 years and still struggle to get some, while another could be here for a few weeks and get a lot of + Karmas, so it's all about quality, just as on the other forum. Although the Karma system can be abuse easily given that any high-ranking account is able to give one while not receiving any (I gave out one +Karma while having zero Karma)

When a user is active it is supposed to be to contribute quality conversations and opinions, not to do nothing, which is why I don't agree with you 100%.

We're partially saying the same thing here ; Karma is not earned based on activities but quality contributions, if I look around I'm likely going to see active accounts with  bunch of posts and no single positive karma.

As for the karma system, it cannot be easily manipulated as you say, since it has restrictions. Each user can only give 1 positive or negative karma to the same user every 10 hours. In case a user receives a lot of negative or positive karma, the administrator will be able to see it in the logs and take necessary action.

I got abused (Karma)on my first day here and admin came to my rescue. I like.it.

The number of posts by a user does not have much relevance, since what should prevail is the quality of those posts. Users with many posts and little karma are usually users who post LQP with the sole purpose of increasing their account rank in order to participate in signature campaigns.

Just because you've received 1 or 2 negative karma doesn't mean the system has been rigged against you, it just means, from what I've read, that your reputation (deserved or not) precedes you. The negative karma probably comes from some BTT user who is on this forum, but don't give it too much importance. You should already know that if you (or any user) receive karma abuse, the administrator can put things back in their place, and the author or authors of that abuse will be punished.

[Litzki1990]

Hi I'm new to the forum

I was wondering is karma more important than point or the other way round

Most likely a few days ago the point was closed in lieu of posting. Basically by breaking the points you earn by posting you can buy the coins specific to this forum. This is the work of points, on the other hand karma is a different matter.  Karma You may not be able to buy coins by breaking like points but when you see positive karma on your profile it means that your posts are of good quality. Your post is quality and the post is informative enough that second or third party is giving you positive karma. Now all the new members who come to this forum may not be able to earn points but they can earn karma right away.

[Rruchi man]

Points is a reward the forum gives you for your good contribution, they can be changed to the forum tokens.

Karma is the way other users evaluate your posts: if they like them they can give +karma, if they really dislike your behavior they can give -karma.

It is important as a forum member that you engage in the evaluation of the post and contributions of other forum members by giving karma to post that deserve it, because in doing so, you assist other forum members who may be new to see and identify forum members who are good members of this forum, and also be careful with others.

Karma is not the only factor to judge a good forum member though because there are some good forum members who have little karma because the people who have come across their post have been stingy with karmas, or not know how to give Karma.

[Findingnemo]

Karma is not the only factor to judge a good forum member though. There are some good forum members who have little karma because the people who have come across their post have been stingy with karmas, or do not know how to give Karma.

I am literally new to this forum but not for crypto-related pieces of stuff which makes me have less Karma under my profile and thanks to the teleporting system which helped me to have the rank which I have on BTT.

I try to be on topic, post that contains some information, and learn a lot from others. Still have to make giving Karma a habit different from meriting, which I have yet to get used to.

+1.

[bitterguy28]

Hi I'm new to the forum

I was wondering is karma more important than point or the other way round

both are important but karma is one thing that represent your account in a manner compared to points than just showing how active you are,
but better to consider them both as important part of your ATT account .

[Sevi]

I do think that both plays a vital role. Karma truly isn't the biggest factor to consider but still it is essential in the forum. Points also contribute a lot to see how active you are in the forum. To sum it up, both are important because karma shows how well do people like you and points shows how active you are.

[DabsPoorVersion]

I do think that both plays a vital role. Karma truly isn't the biggest factor to consider but still it is essential in the forum. Points also contribute a lot to see how active you are in the forum. To sum it up, both are important because karma shows how well do people like you and points shows how active you are.

Maybe for now, but if you are reading for discussions regarding Karma, you will know that it might be one of the thing we need to consider, just like this one. The admin have a plan to change the ranking system, so we better watch for it.

Is it possible to associate karma with increasing rank?. That the minimum karma to rank up is at least 0 or more?.

And see admin's response...

will implement in next change to the ranking system, soon

adding one more to that,

I change the ranking as i see fit ... I do not want anyone to know the process, to avoid abuse.

For campaigns, some require good karma, others don't.

This is required to some signature campaign, even if we don't consider the possible major updates that might happen soon about karma, it is essential to participate in some campaigns.

[Freemind]

Is it possible to associate karma with increasing rank?. That the minimum karma to rank up is at least 0 or more?.

And see admin's response...

The administrator's response is precisely what I expected, but a little earlier  In any case, I suppose that at the time I made the proposal maybe the problem was more focused on spam than other things, but fortunately in the next update we will see something that will help the forum more. Now that some signature campaigns will require a certain amount of karma, it is the best time to implement it.

[DabsPoorVersion]

Is it possible to associate karma with increasing rank?. That the minimum karma to rank up is at least 0 or more?.

And see admin's response...

The administrator's response is precisely what I expected, but a little earlier  In any case, I suppose that at the time I made the proposal maybe the problem was more focused on spam than other things, but fortunately in the next update we will see something that will help the forum more. Now that some signature campaigns will require a certain amount of karma, it is the best time to implement it.

Maybe one factor of why the admin decided to have an earlier update regarding your request to associate karma with increasing rank is because a lot of accounts have suddenly become active, or some members decided to rush ranking up to participate in the increasing numbers of signature campaigns. This is an unexpected event for most of us that the mixer's campaign has brought here.