Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Delgboke on September 06, 2021, 12:52:11 PM
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
-
Now, for a long time, I don't see any signature campaigns on this forum. The author of this theme uses the avatar of Plastic Finance, whose bounty campaign ended exactly one month ago - 06 August. Paying for the bounty hunters in this campaign also has some difficulties. Their telegrams are practically disabled, ostensibly to verify the results of our work. It is only unknown whether the payment of their tokens will be in general, or if this is another deception.
Due to the fact that there are practically no signature campaigns, I see that there are no more than a dozen registered participants on the forum, especially in the morning. The administration of the forum just needs to call names of the companies that use this forum to conduct bounty campaigns on social networks, provide for signature campaigns. Otherwise, this forum will soon lose the majority of its members.
In connection with the urgent problems that have arisen, payment is now relegated to the background.
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
I think all of crypto currency event, bounty campaign, investing etc. Do with your own risk.
So, I agree with you, bounty manager couldn't guarantee 100%.
We all know about swap coin, bounty manager received old coin and the team project didn't send new coins.
It's just sample, bounty problem.
-
projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us
I really agree that the bounty payment is better in top coins such as BTC, ETH, BNB, USDT. This can avoid the massive drop of their token values in the market. It also can minimize the chance of bounty hunters being scammed by the developers. But unfortunately, most developers don't want to do it because they must spend more money if they must pay bounty participants with top coins.
-
I am longing for the days of 2017 and 2018 where bounty hunting can really be profitable...though at that there were already many scams also but those that really made it to exchanges produced significant money for the hunters. These days we are at the mercy of project owners and most BM can not do anything if there can be changes in the terms and conditions to justify giving less than stated in stakes or in some cases just run away. No wonder why many of my friends who were into bounty before are now preferring to get involved with P2E programs.
-
Hunters always have to find a way to ensure their efforts will be rewarded, because projects can completely do everything after bounty campaign ends.
If project is reputable, they will pay the full reward. But sometimes, it's a scam project and they will disappear with investor's money, hunters become helpers of scammers @@
I think bounty managers should escrow token of the project and some amount of TRX/SOL/NEAR/FTM/ADA from project. As such, in any situation, they can distribute rewards to hunters.
-
Bounties, in recent years, have changed a lot. It is totally impossible to be 100% sure as there are too many factors that we must control and we cannot, as it is out of our hands. That the Bounty Managers keep the tokens intended to pay the hunters is not a 100% reliable solution either, since the project "team" can make an exit scam, and those tokens would not have any value, as we have seen with Usogui for example.
-
Bounties, in recent years, have changed a lot. It is totally impossible to be 100% sure as there are too many factors that we must control and we cannot, as it is out of our hands. That the Bounty Managers keep the tokens intended to pay the hunters is not a 100% reliable solution either, since the project "team" can make an exit scam, and those tokens would not have any value, as we have seen with Usogui for example.
The fundamental change from the current bounty is the cost that will be incurred by the owner for the bounty, unlike usually it should be in the form of marketed tokens, because if there is a profit from selling tokens whose price increases, the bounty will not fully enjoy because it is already set at a price.
It's true what you said, even if the Bounty Manager keeps tokens, it's still not the best solution for the bounty because the owner can manipulate it in several ways and usually the Bounty Manager can't make arguments and surrender to the detriment of the bounty. the Bounty Manager should be able to take actions that can make the Owner not violate the rules made, but currently no one can do that.
-
I think what could work and give guarantees to bounty hunters, bounty managers and project owners would be that the budget for the bounty campaign is deposited in an escrow and paid in some stable currency, such as USDT or BUSD. That would make all parties feel more confident and the project would not suffer a massive dump when the bounty hunters sold their tokens. But doing such a thing would require agreeing on too many things, and probably many people would disagree.
-
Of course, payment with top coins moreover BTC, ETH, BNB, or USDT will be much worthier. However, will it is in this forum?
I don't think so because now it is a very difficult condition. The bounty is very limited and we cannot meet a very good bounty campaign with those kinds of payment methods.
-
Of course, payment with top coins moreover BTC, ETH, BNB, or USDT will be much worthier. However, will it is in this forum?
I don't think so because now it is a very difficult condition. The bounty is very limited and we cannot meet a very good bounty campaign with those kinds of payment methods.
As far as I know there was a bounty by Bounty Detective before that paid the hunters with BNB. That was a nice experienced by hunters who participated.
These days we have few bounties and some of them were verified as scam. That's unfortunate. Actually, we cannot perfect to always have a promising payment assuming even btt has a lot of scam bounties.
Since the forum is not yet old enough. I can say that in the future there are more possibilities to have such wonderful payment with BNB, ETH, BTC USDT, SOL, and etc,.
-
Of course, payment with top coins moreover BTC, ETH, BNB, or USDT will be much worthier. However, will it is in this forum?
I don't think so because now it is a very difficult condition. The bounty is very limited and we cannot meet a very good bounty campaign with those kinds of payment methods.
The "problem" is not that it is or not in this forum, the problem is that there are no project teams that pay that way. I have seen very few teams that do something like this, but it is not about one forum or another, they are internal decisions of the teams, since bounty managers don't make that decision either. On the few occasions that I have seen teams pay like this, there has never been a problem.
-
Of course, payment with top coins moreover BTC, ETH, BNB, or USDT will be much worthier. However, will it is in this forum?
I don't think so because now it is a very difficult condition. The bounty is very limited and we cannot meet a very good bounty campaign with those kinds of payment methods.
all in the end it goes back to the owner and team whether it is worth giving as you said, because we know that almost all who make new projects on average have no capital and only capital from investors, which is a separate obstacle because they cannot prepare in advance. but if USDT maybe many have done it but for other coins they will hit a high price.
[/font]The "problem" is not that it is or not in this forum, the problem is that there are no project teams that pay that way. I have seen very few teams that do something like this, but it is not about one forum or another, they are internal decisions of the teams, since bounty managers don't make that decision either. On the few occasions that I have seen teams pay like this, there has never been a problem.
when it comes to payment, there are clearly more variations on the other forum than here and we can't deny that but that's not the main problem actually, I agree with you that it's all decided by the owner and team to pay with what. and the bounty manager has no right to interfere.
but as I explained above, many have paid with USDT, but others may hit a high price, because the calculation will be small when giving.
-
when it comes to payment, there are clearly more variations on the other forum than here and we can't deny that but that's not the main problem actually, I agree with you that it's all decided by the owner and team to pay with what. and the bounty manager has no right to interfere.
but as I explained above, many have paid with USDT, but others may hit a high price, because the calculation will be small when giving.
When a coin/token enters exchanges, the first phase is usually the accumulation, and depending on the total budget of the reward, it does not matter that the bounty hunters sell, but that is another problem. If the bounty hunters are paid in a stable currency, there are no problems with price fluctuations, but if they are paid in the project currency, they can "hurt" the market and investors could retaliate against the project team.
-
Bounty payments are something else right now , no good project is running bounties anymore,this could probably be the end of bounty in the crypto era , cause these days there are more of scam bounties than legit ones.
-
Bounty payments are something else right now , no good project is running bounties anymore,this could probably be the end of bounty in the crypto era , cause these days there are more of scam bounties than legit ones.
Youre right, I think there are more scam bounties than legit.We must be careful to join bounty.
In my opinion, I think there several choice to get profit , you can do traiding or investment..
We all see bounty rewards are lower now. It's waste of time
-
Bounty payments are something else right now , no good project is running bounties anymore,this could probably be the end of bounty in the crypto era , cause these days there are more of scam bounties than legit ones.
I really can accept the fact that this is happening right now, since 2018 when the correction was long, many projects have committed fraud. looking for a momentary profit and do not want to develop the created project, but leave the old project and create a new project. the most important thing for them is the profit that has been obtained.
but we also must not turn a blind eye, that there are still good projects in the sense that the payments made to the bounty do not disappoint. but about whether the project will continue or not, they are still hesitant to see a situation that can indeed be profitable.
The main problem now is that if I see it, the new project that they have set a bounty reward, has been pegged at the value of the money that will be given. different from the past that still give with coins. because it is clear that if you are pegged to the bounty hunter money, you will never get another surprise. so when the coins are distributed, the coins we get will be equal to the value of the money provided, even though it is possible that the coins distributed will increase in price from the sale price and the bounty hunter will not enjoy it.
-
Bounty payments are something else right now , no good project is running bounties anymore,this could probably be the end of bounty in the crypto era , cause these days there are more of scam bounties than legit ones.
I do not agree with you. It is true that the projects have become more "professional" but that does not imply what you say. Not all projects have sufficient funds to be known to the general public from the start, so there are still serious projects that need bounties. An example of this is Cook Finance, or more recently Beyond Protocol, they do not need rewards since they have obtained large initial investments (Beyond Protocol obtained more than $100,000,000 in private sale), but they want to have contact with all kinds of users.
-
Most of bounty manager & high rank authorities continuously shot scamming. Because project team one by one selection lair manager for project promotion. Every project management want to be successful. But most of new investors and old investors can purchases serious project. If someone take place as a Crypto spcialist. They will find out honest manager. If anyone want to save their project money before of promotion/ marketing. They will choose dishonest manager. So need carefully investigation.
-
Most of bounty manager & high rank authorities continuously shot scamming. Because project team one by one selection lair manager for project promotion. Every project management want to be successful. But most of new investors and old investors can purchases serious project. If someone take place as a Crypto spcialist. They will find out honest manager. If anyone want to save their project money before of promotion/ marketing. They will choose dishonest manager. So need carefully investigation.
indeed the problem as a bounty hunter doesn't seem to be able to continue to give a glimmer of hope to get better, especially now that there is no attention at all for bounty hunters, all still happy as an investor even though in the end the results may be the same.
The current bounty is fixated on instantaneous profits and there is no intention from the owner to be able to develop the project but only to make a momentary profit and start with a new project again. It's worrying if it goes like this that there won't be any future improvements for crypto, just look at how many new coins enter the top ranks every year.
I really agree with the long explanation you gave, of course it is very good and deserves all to do well, but again there is no intention for improvement, so that makes us apathetic.
-
That's bounty.
I always like this.
If we want exact payment, yes we need top coins like Bitcoin, USDT, ETH, and also BNB.
But. will the team give us this promotion?
I am sure not.
Only a few projects will give the payment like this and it is about gambling websites.
We may find out that kind of exact payment moreover with escrow, but pretty sure, we are not on this right now. Too difficult to get this kind of payment.
-
That's bounty.
I always like this.
If we want exact payment, yes we need top coins like Bitcoin, USDT, ETH, and also BNB.
But. will the team give us this promotion?
I am sure not.
Only a few projects will give the payment like this and it is about gambling websites.
We may find out that kind of exact payment moreover with escrow, but pretty sure, we are not on this right now. Too difficult to get this kind of payment.
Yeah, seldom to find bounty with top 10 payment for hunters. More often the project own token is the payment base which another way to add another holders once payment was done. Team are also doing what they comprehend to stabilize and make the project popular and create more attraction at any aspect as much as possible. This is all about business and competition of the best among the best. Weak and scam project could end very soon but the strong project that we promote will stand firm now and in the future. How I wish to experience stable or the top 10 coin payment in due time.
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
I think all of crypto currency event, bounty campaign, investing etc. Do with your own risk.
So, I agree with you, bounty manager couldn't guarantee 100%.
We all know about swap coin, bounty manager received old coin and the team project didn't send new coins.
It's just sample, bounty problem.
That's really true , we aren't 100% sure in any project they are really paying us or not . We must do a proper analysis before we are going to join any bounty. Sometimes bountys gives us good profit or somethime we just waste our time ;) .
Trying to join 8 to 9 bounty so if 4 to 5 bounty are legit then we can get over-all good profit 📈 :) .
-
I think a Bounty Manager and a Bounty Hunter have the same goal, want to profit from the Bounty project. The one who cheated the most in my journey of playing Bounty was the Team of the project, whether it was Dev or something else.
The Bounty Manager should before promoting their project, it would be better in the future they ask for tokens or gift allocation from the project first, so that at the end of the campaign and when payment everything will run easily.
-
I think a Bounty Manager and a Bounty Hunter have the same goal, want to profit from the Bounty project. The one who cheated the most in my journey of playing Bounty was the Team of the project, whether it was Dev or something else.
The Bounty Manager should before promoting their project, it would be better in the future they ask for tokens or gift allocation from the project first, so that at the end of the campaign and when payment everything will run easily.
You're right, We all see the team projects have cheated bounty hunter and bounty manager.
if we joined on reputated bounty manager , we will get good.project and not scam.
But there are several scam bounty manager at forum.
So be careful.
-
I think a Bounty Manager and a Bounty Hunter have the same goal, want to profit from the Bounty project. The one who cheated the most in my journey of playing Bounty was the Team of the project, whether it was Dev or something else.
The Bounty Manager should before promoting their project, it would be better in the future they ask for tokens or gift allocation from the project first, so that at the end of the campaign and when payment everything will run easily.
True. The project development is the crucial point that needs to maintain which to work tirelessly is a must for the team to achieve success. However, along the journey they might experience high pressure of comparison and competition since this is a business sector. If the team cannot handle the pressure, time to say goodbye.
Slowly they will refrain from communicating the community and will provide crucial changes. Then few days left they will totally gone.
Now, the pressure is up to the managers. Because of hunters disrespectful and ungrateful attitude, managers pressure is become higher yo the point they possibly answer harsh words not to harass the community but to guide that they are not the responsible to make the project success.
Managers and hunters should respect and understand each other.
-
Bounty hunters are endangered species these days, being hunted down by project team and devs, bounty managers and unfavorable crypto clime. Only the strong survive
-
There are some bounties that are paying on usdt. As a bounty hunter I expect payments from all bounties. This is normal. But not all bounties are successful anymore. As a result, unsuccessful bounty will pay hunters from where. But some bounties do not pay the Hunters even after they are successful. These are the real scammers.
-
One of the risks of joining a bounty campaign is the scam itself.
And we cannot force or make a big expectation that the project will pay us on USDT or other top coins. Why? Because not all new projects have enough funds to do that.Most of them will prefer to pay with their own token because they don't need to prepare the money, but only preparing or sparing some of their token allocations for promotion
-
Perhaps they'll have to start a new rule for receiving at least 50% of the bounty rewards before starting the bounty (to avoid payment delays after bounty). Maybe if all bounty hunters discuss this rule and agree with each other things will change and the problem between projects and bounty hunters will be over.
-
Perhaps they'll have to start a new rule for receiving at least 50% of the bounty rewards before starting the bounty (to avoid payment delays after bounty). Maybe if all bounty hunters discuss this rule and agree with each other things will change and the problem between projects and bounty hunters will be over.
I think bounty hunter should have their tokens before opening their bounty, or have guarantee.
Escrow.
Because I see there are many scam projects, after their projects were successful, they didn't pay bounty hunter with many reasons.
-
Perhaps, on the one hand, it would be better to come up with some kind of price list in accordance with the rank of the user, but on the other hand, sometimes very conscientious projects come across. Therefore, it is difficult to answer this question unambiguously.
-
It would be nice if all bounty campaigns pays btc, eth or usdt to the hunters but they prefer to pay their own token because they don't have funds yet to pay to the hunters. Bounty managers are also bounty hunters we should not blame them handling a scam project because detecting scam project is really difficult. I'd seen many projects looks legit but turn to scam in the end.
-
One of the risks of joining a bounty campaign is the scam itself.
And we cannot force or make a big expectation that the project will pay us on USDT or other top coins. Why? Because not all new projects have enough funds to do that.Most of them will prefer to pay with their own token because they don't need to prepare the money, but only preparing or sparing some of their token allocations for promotion
I think bounty manager should have their tokens or escrow.
Because Several scams team project didn't pay the bounty Hunter.
Their projects was successful, buy they didn't pay bounty hunter.
Talking about fund, I think several team have fund, but scammers gonna scam, I think.
It's not matter of funds. But their character
-
It's funny how a manager who conducts a bounty can know in advance whether the people who hired him will be deceived or not? The only guarantee of payment to hunters is when the entire pool of rewards is transferred to the manager in advance. But very few projects go to such conditions, so hunters will continue to be deceived. Such is life.
-
In the current scenario, except for some reputable managers, the rest of the bounty managers run scam bounty.In the meantime, I have received a few bounty payments that will not be exchanged for a lifetime. So what is the benefit of getting all these bounty payments.
-
bounty campaign payments will usually pay off smoothly when the project is managed by a trusted person, but when the bounty campaign is held by a person with a bad reputation it will be dangerous because sometimes the running campaign is not paid to the participants, even better when the bounty allocation is paid and has been given to the person in charge.
-
There are many campaigns among Bounty campaigns that are completed successfully, but Bounty managers cheat with Bounty Hunters. However, there are many honest managers who regularly come up with good ones. And they successfully complete the delivery. Many project teams are dishonest so they don't pay the county hunters. So scamming is more on campaign sites. However, if you do research, you can understand that any bounty project is good.
-
Perhaps they'll have to start a new rule for receiving at least 50% of the bounty rewards before starting the bounty (to avoid payment delays after bounty). Maybe if all bounty hunters discuss this rule and agree with each other things will change and the problem between projects and bounty hunters will be over.
The problem that exists with bounty campaign rewards has been relevant for a long time. There are dishonest developers and irresponsible participants of bounty projects on both sides. This spoils the overall impression. I think that if decent participants carefully choose a high-quality project, then everyone will remain with a good profit and in a good mood.
-
There were already too many irresponsible project teams, they disappeared after the bounties ended. I have experienced many times this bad story, so I am not surprised by the facts. We cannot expect too much on bounty payment if it is not escrowed yet. The teams of the projects can disappear at any time, then we get nothing.
-
There were already too many irresponsible project teams, they disappeared after the bounties ended. I have experienced many times this bad story, so I am not surprised by the facts. We cannot expect too much on bounty payment if it is not escrowed yet. The teams of the projects can disappear at any time, then we get nothing.
Good advice, we cannot expect too much on bounty payment if it s not escrow yet. Because several teams are scam.
Maybe the bounty manager is good and reputated.
But the team project is scam.
I personally ever join bounty, project was successfully but not paid their reward for bounty hunter
-
A number of bounty projects have been successful in the current cryptocurrency market as all coins have improved. If the project manager and team management want, then his project will be successful. But how many? Poor quality bounty managers kill payments after the bounty is complete. Hunters do not pay.
-
A valuable information. It has always been seen that a lot of managers, especially Bounty Hunder, get hired but eventually run away without being paid. This is an image of the forum. To do. So those of us who are senior officials will pay a little attention to this in particular.Some unscrupulous traders have come here and are cheating the Bounty Handers.
-
I think bounty manager should have their tokens or escrow.
Because Several scams team project didn't pay the bounty Hunter.
Their projects was successful, buy they didn't pay bounty hunter.
Talking about fund, I think several team have fund, but scammers gonna scam, I think.
It's not matter of funds. But their character
Escrow reward has a lot of advantage than not. However it does not guarantee the valuable price after payment. In fact escrow token reward is useless if the project turn to scam. The full benefit of escrow token is when the project succeeded and the token has a value like potential.
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
I have joined many projects and still working and in this site I have been working more than three years but most of the time I noticed that when the project complete then scam .this is very common matter and the other is team manager . Because they announce first that the project is scamed
-
Bounty campaign hunting just a cheap activities in the forum because we are hunters only working hard but we cannot get nothing from bounty campaign.
-
This topic has been raised many times, different opinions and different solutions have been expressed, but nothing has changed. Project teams don't want to change anything with payment. They benefit from the current situation, where they dictate their terms to bounty hunters. We just got the team to transfer the amount of new tokens to some managers in advance, which they undertake to pay us at the end of the bounty campaigns. However, here too, the scammers found a way out and change the name of the tokens for the completion of the ICO, and the tokens listed earlier turn out to be useless numbers.
We can only count on government regulation of this type of activity or on changes in the working conditions of such teams on this forum as a whole.
-
Bounty campaign hunting just a cheap activities in the forum because we are hunters only working hard but we cannot get nothing from bounty campaign.
Keep calm, It was several time happened. But there are always be good bounty here.
So don't worry and always learn the project and the team.
Maybe we will get new legit bounty again.
I think members here, has been joined at legit bounty
-
Projects that end up being scams and hunters who don't get their rights at the end of the campaign, it seems this has become a common sight. Honestly, I prefer to be paid in usdt because it can be a definite income and on the other hand bounty hunters can become investors if they feel that the project they are promoting has good potential. I believe most bounty hunters are investors.
-
Unfortunately, no one can guarantee that at the end of a bounty campaign the bounty hunters will be paid, not even a trusted bounty manager because often the payments depend on the project team that advertises and sometimes they are scams or refuse to pay there is no certainty of payment but it works so you have to take risks
-
if there is a scam then it is definitely a bad project in the future because there will be a lot of people who talk bad about it and ruin their reputation. you should be careful when you want to participate in the bounty campaign so as not to disappoint you.
-
This is what exactly all bounty hunters think. But that is not what the team thinks. Not all team has enough funds to pay the bounty hunters and other promotions with that money. That is why most will pay them using their own tokens. because they don't need to spend the money but only allocating their tokens to give to the participants.
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
Well, manager should escrow or have tokens of the project.
Because there are several scam.projects and always be there .
We as bounty hunter should learn the projects and the manager .
But remember there is succes project but not paid their bounty too.
-
When a coin/token enters exchanges, the first phase is usually the accumulation, and depending on the total budget of the reward, it does not matter that the bounty hunters sell, but that is another problem. If the bounty hunters are paid in a stable currency, there are no problems with price fluctuations, but if they are paid in the project currency, they can "hurt" the market and investors could retaliate against the project team.
-
Projects that end up being scams and hunters who don't get their rights at the end of the campaign, it seems this has become a common sight. Honestly, I prefer to be paid in usdt because it can be a definite income and on the other hand bounty hunters can become investors if they feel that the project they are promoting has good potential. I believe most bounty hunters are investors.
In order to become an investor in a bounty project, I think you need a lot of knowledge and experience. After all, it is very difficult to determine the prospects of the project for the future, even despite the beautiful advertising of the developers. And you should pay attention to the developers, if they already had projects that were successful, this can guarantee the profitability of investing in them.
-
It is not encouraging at all the way the bounty hunters are been treated in recent times. Years back, it was not like this when they devoted their time and resources to work for a particular project or project and after that they will not like to pay the bounty hunters their rewards. I have made up my mind to stop participating in bounty campaigns after this year-end as a result of this development. You can't be working at the end of the day you are not paid. I will render stick to trading and investing in good projects. This will pay me rather than wasting my time on bounty campaigns.
-
Projects that end up being scams and hunters who don't get their rights at the end of the campaign, it seems this has become a common sight. Honestly, I prefer to be paid in usdt because it can be a definite income and on the other hand bounty hunters can become investors if they feel that the project they are promoting has good potential. I believe most bounty hunters are investors.
In order to become an investor in a bounty project, I think you need a lot of knowledge and experience. After all, it is very difficult to determine the prospects of the project for the future, even despite the beautiful advertising of the developers. And you should pay attention to the developers, if they already had projects that were successful, this can guarantee the profitability of investing in them.
As you said, I think It's no easy to predict bounty project will success or not
I personally don't think to be in Investor at bounty project
Its more risky
As bounty hunter is more profitable and safe.
-
payment from the results of the bounty campaign in my opinion depends on how the project is and of course from the bounty manager who participates in the distribution of payments for campaign participants, because sometimes existing projects have paid for distribution to participants but the bounty manager limits it or escaping the allocation of campaign participants.
-
Projects that end up being scams and hunters who don't get their rights at the end of the campaign, it seems this has become a common sight. Honestly, I prefer to be paid in usdt because it can be a definite income and on the other hand bounty hunters can become investors if they feel that the project they are promoting has good potential. I believe most bounty hunters are investors.
In order to become an investor in a bounty project, I think you need a lot of knowledge and experience. After all, it is very difficult to determine the prospects of the project for the future, even despite the beautiful advertising of the developers. And you should pay attention to the developers, if they already had projects that were successful, this can guarantee the profitability of investing in them.
As you said, I think It's no easy to predict bounty project will success or not
I personally don't think to be in Investor at bounty project
Its more risky
As bounty hunter is more profitable and safe.
The position of a bounty hunter is certainly more advantageous. But some people want more and are making attempts for further development within this sphere in cryptocurrency. When we reach a certain level of literacy, we always want to try new risky directions.
-
Bounty is one of the best crypto currency marketing system in the whole world right now because lots of bounty hunter always remain ready for doing their work for that reason i think it is right system for doing marketing but lots of project are getting scam and also paying less amount of moneyso i think this forum need to be more active launching new bounty in this forum. So that payment may get confirm ro the user.
-
Of course, payment with top coins moreover BTC, ETH, BNB, or USDT will be much worthier. However, will it is in this forum?
I don't think so because now it is a very difficult condition. The bounty is very limited and we cannot meet a very good bounty campaign with those kinds of payment methods.
It's good bounty if we will be paid by top coins like BTC, BNB, USDT, ETH.
But we all know bounty is part of promotion of project.
Of course new project that have new coins.
I personally prefer join bounty that paid by new coins.
such beyond protocol, it is more valuable than paid top coins.
-
There are also some bounty companies that are scamming the bounty hunters after completing their job. There is a bounty company that is always doing that. Short paying bounty or selecting few bounty hunters and pay them. The remaining balance they go away with them. I have done a lot through that company and I have not been receiving payments. Now, I have participating in bounty through them.
-
I think good to pay hunters in Bnb, Ethereum, btc, or usdt. This will make everything clear that the project is big and the hunters must be smart. But the negative side is some hunters are messy and so spammer just want to complete the weekly task for reward without quality in their postings. If we want to get paid in Bnb or usdt we must be smart and quality.
-
I think good to pay hunters in Bnb, Ethereum, btc, or usdt. This will make everything clear that the project is big and the hunters must be smart. But the negative side is some hunters are messy and so spammer just want to complete the weekly task for reward without quality in their postings. If we want to get paid in Bnb or usdt we must be smart and quality.
Yes , paid in BTC, ETH, USDT,BNB are more clear because we know the price of those coins.
New coins is more risky, we all see several new coins failed.
Never listed on exchange.
But If we join in legit bounty and potential new coins, I will choose new coins than top coin.
-
I actually concur that the bounty payment is finer in peak coins like this as BTC, ETH, BNB, USDT. This may get off the huge spill of their token values in the bazar . It as well be able keep down the scope of bounty hunters nature scammed by the developers. But sadly , nearly all developers don't desire to do it because they fungus lay out much money if they should salary bounty participants across head coins.
-
This is generally a separate topic for discussion and there will most likely be some emotions ... For example, there are now some well-known projects in which many have taken part, their coins are already traded, they have a good capitalization and price, and the payment to the hunters has not been paid, here, of course, a complete failure ... This is a huge blow to your project's image.
-
There are also some bounty companies that are scamming the bounty hunters after completing their job. There is a bounty company that is always doing that. Short paying bounty or selecting few bounty hunters and pay them. The remaining balance they go away with them. I have done a lot through that company and I have not been receiving payments. Now, I have participating in bounty through them.
As bounty hunter we will face scam bounty and legit bounty.
It depends on team project and bounty manager.
Because If bounty manager is legit and good, bout project team is scammers, we also never get tokens.
So, we must be careful and learn the team project and their bounty manager.
-
Some bounty managers will get paid Bitcoin and Eth if they want it and even then in escrow, but some developers will want something else, they will allocate a certain amount of tokens and with those tokens they pay it, this is where the bounty manager's decision will determine, because I believe they did their research also before choosing to be part of the Bounty.
-
Some bounty managers will get paid Bitcoin and Eth if they want it and even then in escrow, but some developers will want something else, they will allocate a certain amount of tokens and with those tokens they pay it, this is where the bounty manager's decision will determine, because I believe they did their research also before choosing to be part of the Bounty.
If we talking about which more profitable paid in bitcoin and Ethereum or bounty tokens.
I think bounty token is more profitable and will give you big profit than top coins.
-
This is the saddest part for the bounty hunters when they get denied to pay for their work. Bounty hunters also devoted their time for the promotion without any biasness but when they come to know dev denied to pay to give just meage of amount that disappointed the hunters. Bounty managers should be strict also to reduce such incidents because as a hunter we work for the bounty manager and we deal with the bounty manager. At present I noticed Brainboss and Yahoo bounty managers are good in giving us the good project I see they focus on the quality rather than the numbers.
-
I think it is fair to understand the 3 parties involved, teams, bounty managers and bounty hunters. Many teams "freak out" when they see that thousands of people want to participate in the bounty, thinking that almost all of them are bots. Bounty managers have a tough job of making things work and making sure there are no cheaters, something almost impossible to detect 100%. Bounty hunters must do their job and abide by the campaign rules, something that unfortunately few users do.
It's getting harder and harder to find good rewards to participate in, but luckily there are still some good ones.
-
bounty hunters also promote if we choose which part is profitable I think bounty tokens are very profitable because I believe they have done research we must be careful and do research and team work to avoid fraudulent projects
-
It's getting harder and harder to find good rewards to participate in, but luckily there are still some good ones.
When compared with 4 years ago, the current bounty is far below that. But I think this is still worth following even though the payment is small, but we still have to be careful in choosing the Bounty that we will participate in.
-
If project owners pay Bounty Hunters with stablecoin, then what is the advantage of the projects? Because every project creates its own tokens and wants to make a profit by selling them. If the project is successful, they distribute a portion among the Bounty Hunters. But if the project is not successful, how will they pay the Hunters?
-
Payments from participating in bounty campaigns usually have a delivery duration depending on when the developer distributes it, it's just that much of what is not paid to the participants is purely the developer's fault, while the bounty manager is only a bridge that can only manage the campaign.
-
Payments from participating in bounty campaigns usually have a delivery duration depending on when the developer distributes it, it's just that much of what is not paid to the participants is purely the developer's fault, while the bounty manager is only a bridge that can only manage the campaign.
Well I agree , bounty payment depends on developers, But If bounty manager has escrow, I think Bounty Manager can distribute soon, As the agreement with developer.
But, I see only several BMs Have escrow..
-
Payments from participating in bounty campaigns usually have a delivery duration depending on when the developer distributes it, it's just that much of what is not paid to the participants is purely the developer's fault, while the bounty manager is only a bridge that can only manage the campaign.
Unfortunately, not all projects become successful, even if the developers do their job very well and an analysis was carried out before starting the project. The market is difficult to predict, so taking part in the project we risk not getting anything for objective reasons caused by volatility.
-
projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us
I really agree that the bounty payment is better in top coins such as BTC, ETH, BNB, USDT. This can avoid the massive drop of their token values in the market. It also can minimize the chance of bounty hunters being scammed by the developers. But unfortunately, most developers don't want to do it because they must spend more money if they must pay bounty participants with top coins.
I appreciate your every word because you have explained it so beautifully. In fact, if you want to get good Bounty Prentice, you must run BTC and Etherium campaigns, then Bounty users will not be fooled.I like your every word.
-
It would be a better idea if the hunters get money in USDT, Ethereum & BNB instead of the native currency of the project but it is not in the hand of the Bounty Manager if the dev is agreed to pay in another currency that would be good for the hunters and nobody will blame that hunters sell the coins at cheap price. Many projects scammed us so we have to move on rather than repent on it.
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
even big projects scam us too
i worked for loopring project as translator ( its big project at market )
and they dont pay for me LRC , which is their coin , they pay LRN and LRQ ( they said its loopring on NEO and QTUM projects)
that was at 2019 , and there is no loopring on NEO & no Loopring on QTUM in the market
i contacted them many times and no response
-
It would be a better idea if the hunters get money in USDT, Ethereum & BNB instead of the native currency of the project but it is not in the hand of the Bounty Manager if the dev is agreed to pay in another currency that would be good for the hunters and nobody will blame that hunters sell the coins at cheap price. Many projects scammed us so we have to move on rather than repent on it.
I think bounty paid in top coins is good idea.
But It's not profitable for us.
I personally prefer join bounty paid in their tokens, although new coins.
-
@MaMooN we all want to hear your thoughts on what's happening with rewards, but you don't have to use such a large font for us to read your post. A well written post with useful information receives more attention than a post with a large font.
Keep this in mind for the future, as some moderators may delete your posts.
-
This is the crux of the matter. Crypto being a wild wild west is living up to its name. On bounties, an average hunter gets scammed by the project. If its not the project, then its the bounty manager. If its not the bounty manager, then it's his or her fellow hunter. Lol
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
even big projects scam us too
i worked for loopring project as translator ( its big project at market )
and they dont pay for me LRC , which is their coin , they pay LRN and LRQ ( they said its loopring on NEO and QTUM projects)
that was at 2019 , and there is no loopring on NEO & no Loopring on QTUM in the market
i contacted them many times and no response
all my work was officially and documented and approved by loopring github
and all mail work orders or modify with Daniel Wang (Founder and CEO at Loopring Foundation)
so till this moment I dont know why they promise to lunch loopring on neo & qtum , while they will not list them at market place
I mean it is not practically to create loopring on another blockchains infrastructure with new coins
there is some projects support many blocchains with only one main coin , for example c98 , which supports assets across a variety of blockchains, including but not limited to Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Solana, Avalanche and Tron. Coin98 also has a wallet amongst its offerings, which supports over 25 networks on both its mobile and desktop platforms.
my payment should be 10000 loopring , which is by today price 25000$
any one know how to get my rights or raise suit
really i dont know , what should i do ?
-
There are many campaigns among Bounty campaigns that are completed successfully, but Bounty managers cheat with Bounty Hunters. However, there are many honest managers who regularly come up with good ones. And they successfully complete the delivery.
-
really i dont know , what should i do ?[/b][/size][/color]
If you are just a bounty hunter and not a hired person with a contract, then there is nothing legal you can do about your issue.
In the very beginning, was LRC the token announced as a payment for translation? Who do you contact with? Bounty managers or directly with their CEO ? If you thing bounty managers cheat on you, you can forward your situation directly to the team. If you communicate directly with the team, then there is not much you can do.
-
If you are just a bounty hunter and not a hired person with a contract, then there is nothing legal you can do about your issue.
In the very beginning, was LRC the token announced as a payment for translation? Who do you contact with? Bounty managers or directly with their CEO ? If you thing bounty managers cheat on you, you can forward your situation directly to the team. If you communicate directly with the team, then there is not much you can do.
I agree with you. Sometimes, and depending on the bounty, it is better to contact the team members directly. If the service you want to offer is not one of those that are always available, Twitter, Telegram, signature, it is best to talk to the team, otherwise the bounty manager will not even listen to what we are saying. But we always have to come to terms, otherwise people will do the job for nothing.
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
Even the Signature you are wearing is one of the scam projects too. Apart from the ones that end up being totally dead, there are also the ones that are still here but end up not paying after all the work have been done. I would suggest that the bounty managers and forum owners also help the hunters mount a SCAN campaign against the ones that are still here but refuse to pay. This is the only way to curb this malice a bit cos hunters can't do it alone and it's sad.
-
Even the Signature you are wearing is one of the scam projects too. Apart from the ones that end up being totally dead, there are also the ones that are still here but end up not paying after all the work have been done. I would suggest that the bounty managers and forum owners also help the hunters mount a SCAN campaign against the ones that are still here but refuse to pay. This is the only way to curb this malice a bit cos hunters can't do it alone and it's sad.
From my point of view, a good idea would be for all bounties to put the funds in an escrow, so that everything is more "safe". But it's still something that many teams would reject, raising questions about whether or not their project is legitimate. Proposing that bounty managers and forum owners do a scan is impossible, it would be a titanic job and some forums would reject the idea as well. In this case, unfortunately we cannot control everything.
-
Even the Signature you are wearing is one of the scam projects too. Apart from the ones that end up being totally dead, there are also the ones that are still here but end up not paying after all the work have been done. I would suggest that the bounty managers and forum owners also help the hunters mount a SCAN campaign against the ones that are still here but refuse to pay. This is the only way to curb this malice a bit cos hunters can't do it alone and it's sad.
From my point of view, a good idea would be for all bounties to put the funds in an escrow, so that everything is more "safe". But it's still something that many teams would reject, raising questions about whether or not their project is legitimate. Proposing that bounty managers and forum owners do a scan is impossible, it would be a titanic job and some forums would reject the idea as well. In this case, unfortunately we cannot control everything.
That is a good idea but I am also thinking, for those projects that just want to scam hunters, if the funds are not in stablecoins or Bitcoin, is it not possible for these scam projects that don't want to pay hunters to folk their coins/token after the distribution? cos this guys will go all the way not to pay hunters.
-
This happens a lot man. I my self witness many time that bounty projects ran away with hunters reward or they cut the reward to half at the end of bounty campaign with a made up reason. project like those never go top and sure to fail and crumble in the end.
-
If the bounty hunters are paid in a stable currency, there are no problems with price fluctuations, but if they are paid in the project currency, they can "hurt" the market and investors could retaliate against the project team.
-
Every time you participate in bounty, consider you are learning something new and gaining experience. Before joining, focus on outcome that you are not going to be rewarded, instead of planning how you will spend your reward. In fact, you are working as a bounty hunter on your own will and unofficially. So dont be surprised if you are scammed.
-
it in several ways and usually the Bounty Manager can't make arguments and surrender to the detriment of the bounty. the Bounty Manager should be able to take actions that can make the Owner not violate the rules made, but currently no one can do that.
-
That is a good idea but I am also thinking, for those projects that just want to scam hunters, if the funds are not in stablecoins or Bitcoin, is it not possible for these scam projects that don't want to pay hunters to folk their coins/token after the distribution? cos this guys will go all the way not to pay hunters.
If a "team" wants to scam investors or bounty hunters, it can do so in many ways. But if the bounty managers demand that the payment (in project tokens or stablecoins/Bitcoin) be in escrow, everyone could be more confident. Still, it would be possible that they were scammers (changing the smart contract, for example if project tokens are used) but they would have far fewer options and, as I said, generally everyone would trust more.
-
I' m earing 5K$ in bounty, I' get tomorrow bounty GHC token 1000$. now many project is live so can joining new bounty and earn big profit.
-
If the bounty hunters are paid in a stable currency, there are no problems with price fluctuations, but if they are paid in the project currency, they can "hurt" the market and investors could retaliate against the project team.
I think it's rare the bounty manager will pay at stable coin, USDT or BUSD.
I think bounty is one of promotion way.
So, We will be paid in new tokens.
-
Not only project recently i saw some BM also scamming for bounty rewards. Team pays them hunters rewards and they sell them for themselves. Many projects promised to pay in the current market price of the coin in the time of distribution and they sell of to dump the market and take a snapshot of the price after the price is dumped so that hunters get fewer rewards.
-
I came to this forum in June 2021. There wasn't any bounties. During last months of 2021 I took part in some of them. It is good way to get some profit but if you will have high rank and accounts (for example in Twitter, Facebook) with many subscribers. Anyway I like to participate in bounties. In my first bounty compain I earned about 20$. So if you want to get more you need to work very hard.
-
Yes, it's very bad some projects dev get promotion and did not pay a single dime to the hunters after getting promotion of their projects. This is not good behavior by the devs and they should also take care of the hunters who help the project to increase the outreach across the world. Escrow projects are good for the bounty hunters at least they get the reward at the end of the campaign. Payment in BNB, Eth, or USDT can be a good idea and possibly avoid dumping the coins.
-
when it comes to payment, there are clearly more variations on the other forum than here and we can't deny that but that's not the main problem actually, I agree with you that it's all decided by the owner and team to pay with what. and the bounty manager has no right to interfere.
but as I explained above, many have paid with USDT, but others may hit a high price, because the calculation will be small when giving.
When a coin/token enters exchanges, the first phase is usually the accumulation, and depending on the total budget of the reward, it does not matter that the bounty hunters sell, but that is another problem. If the bounty hunters are paid in a stable currency, there are no problems with price fluctuations, but if they are paid in the project currency, they can "hurt" the market and investors could retaliate against the project team.
This issue has been discussed many times, but few people are willing to pay hunters in a stable currency. Few people are confident in the excellent and rapid development of their project, so no one wants to risk their own funds.
-
As a person am so concerned about bounty campaign that has made it a habit of running away with Hunter's rewards am also using this medium to appeal to all the bounty campaign managers as a matter of suggestion to them, if projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us of our time, Data and our payments after many weeks of dedicating our time to promote their projects end of the day they just take on their heels and run away some of the project owners end up deleting the website of their projects just like BSCBOMB Cryptocurrency project scammed us of our time and data we use to promote, which is very bad. Am suggesting to the bounty managers that they should do the needful to avoid project that will just come in the Cryptocurrency forum and scammed people. What do you people think about this?
I believe that in such cases, most of the responsibility is to be a bounty manager, this is his reputation, because he agreed on the bounty program, I am sure he received his reward in full, but hunters are always left with this problem one-on-one.
-
I think it's rare the bounty manager will pay at stable coin, USDT or BUSD.
I think bounty is one of promotion way.
So, We will be paid in new tokens.
No, I can assure you that it is not uncommon for a team to pay with stable currency, I have seen it several times. It is a way to protect the project token and prevent bounty hunters from dump it immediately when the token first enters an exchange. In fact, it is the best way to protect a token, and also a way to give investors more security, since they know that no one will sell at very low prices, so the amount of money the project receives may be higher.
-
incidents like this keep happening. is there no solution to this problem.. they are very fraudulent and irresponsible.. after cheating then back again with a new project and again giving the lure of paying etherium, bnb, udt etc..
-
If currently, you do not have any job to do then bounty can be good for you. There is still some project that can give you a good amount of money because of their uniqueness in the crypto space. I saw some BM bringing valuable project recently that has good partnership news and are backed by big VC and exchange. So bounty is still a good way to earn crypto.
-
This issue has been discussed many times, but few people are willing to pay hunters in a stable currency. Few people are confident in the excellent and rapid development of their project, so no one wants to risk their own funds.
No, that a team pays with stable currency does not mean that it is from the personal funds of the team members, it means that it is from the money from the sale of the ICO, IDO or whatever. It is true that there are few teams that do something like this, but those teams are the ones that investors and bounty hunters trust the most, and they are usually teams that offer very good products, those that have things clear from the beginning.
-
projects owners should be paying bounty Hunter's with etherum, BNB or probably USDT instead of them scamming us
I really agree that the bounty payment is better in top coins such as BTC, ETH, BNB, USDT. This can avoid the massive drop of their token values in the market. It also can minimize the chance of bounty hunters being scammed by the developers. But unfortunately, most developers don't want to do it because they must spend more money if they must pay bounty participants with top coins.
Top coin rewards sometimes happen, but this happens quite rarely. It is unprofitable for project teams to pay top or stable coins to bounty campaign participants, since it will be their own money, and no one can be sure of the success of a new project. Therefore, it is easier for them to pay with created tokens. If the project fails, then the paid tokens will also be worth nothing.
-
Top coin rewards sometimes happen, but this happens quite rarely. It is unprofitable for project teams to pay top or stable coins to bounty campaign participants, since it will be their own money, and no one can be sure of the success of a new project. Therefore, it is easier for them to pay with created tokens. If the project fails, then the paid tokens will also be worth nothing.
No, it is the opposite, when a team pays with stable coins or BTC for example, it is cheaper for them. By paying bounty hunters in this way, the team prevents bounty hunters from doing a massive dump when the coin/token is available on exchanges, thus reducing the value of the project, and it also makes investors much more confident from the start of sales, thereby attracting more potential investors. It's about paying bounty hunters for their work while protecting the project.
-
Now every manager add a disclaimer on the thread they are not responsible for the distribution so we can't do anything nowadays some bounty managers are doing escrow projects as well that is quite good for the hunters but if the Bounty managers asked the projects dev to pay in BNB, USDT and Ethereum that would be a better idea whether the rewards are not big but atleast hunters are assured to get some amount instead of getting scammed.
-
Now every manager add a disclaimer on the thread they are not responsible for the distribution so we can't do anything nowadays some bounty managers are doing escrow projects as well that is quite good for the hunters but if the Bounty managers asked the projects dev to pay in BNB, USDT and Ethereum that would be a better idea whether the rewards are not big but atleast hunters are assured to get some amount instead of getting scammed.
I think it's good idea if bounty manager should ask escrow on top coins. As you said BNB, BTC, USDT etc.
Because there are many scam projects.
Although reputated bounty manager also being scammed.
It's very annoying.
So escrow is the best way to reduce scam projects and we as bounty hunter being paid in top coins.
-
Top coin rewards sometimes happen, but this happens quite rarely. It is unprofitable for project teams to pay top or stable coins to bounty campaign participants, since it will be their own money, and no one can be sure of the success of a new project. Therefore, it is easier for them to pay with created tokens. If the project fails, then the paid tokens will also be worth nothing.
No, it is the opposite, when a team pays with stable coins or BTC for example, it is cheaper for them. By paying bounty hunters in this way, the team prevents bounty hunters from doing a massive dump when the coin/token is available on exchanges, thus reducing the value of the project, and it also makes investors much more confident from the start of sales, thereby attracting more potential investors. It's about paying bounty hunters for their work while protecting the project.
Well, there is logic in your arguments. The team of the new project pays off the stablecoins collected during the ICO and eliminates the danger of a mass throw of their tokens after listing on the exchange. It will also be a good indication for investors and bounty campaigners that the project is not fraudulent and the team is confident in the success of their project. We just don't see it happening in practice. It's a pity. I would love to join projects that pay with stablecoins, even if it is half with their tokens.
-
Joining in any of the bounty payment here in the cryptocurrency is very risky, that is why most of the time some of the bounty managers announced via their bounty threads that the distribution of payment was not in their hands, especially if there is no escrows. So the blame in the end is in the hand of the participants who will join in the campaign.
-
The answer to all these is escrowing the funds. But not all the managers would demand that feature and definitely not all projects would do that. But then I think its still a feasible thought
-
Yes, bounty payments has been a lingering issue since the days of ICOs, and till now, bounty payments remains unchanged. Many us has clamoured for an escrow fund to the bounty managers but not all projects team will ascept escrow options.
I think the only option to hunters is to join bounties that has escrowed fund to mangers if individuals can't participate on campaigns that has no escrowed payments.
-
Getting bounty rewards in Eth, BNB, and USDT is a good option so that hunters know that they will get paid at the end of the campaign. On the other hand, Most of the new ICOs coins never launched on the exchange or you can say failed to collect the amount to run the project or some scammed and run away. Apart from this If all bounty Managers do Escrow the amount at the start of the campaign that would also be a good choice.
-
some bounty manager applied escrow to several campaign they managed, its give us important protection about distribution atleast no matter how much it worth later. bounty hunter give positive responsw when they know bounty token reward escrowed,
-
some bounty manager applied escrow to several campaign they managed, its give us important protection about distribution atleast no matter how much it worth later. bounty hunter give positive responsw when they know bounty token reward escrowed,
In part I agree with you, but what you say supposes another type of added problem. Having a bounty manager escrow to hold the bounty funds is a good idea, but it is no longer a good idea if the project team does an exit scam, the bounty coin/token would be worthless. That is why I have always thought that the best thing a team can do is pay in one of the stablecoins, that is beneficial for all parties, something as simple as that would give everyone peace of mind.
-
If the team of the new project does not want to pay the participants of bounty campaigns for any reason, it has every opportunity to do so, because this activity is still not regulated in any way. That is, they can promise anything, including payments in BTC, ETH, USDT, and eventually run away with the collected funds without paying. Bounty hunters are constantly taking risks, because there is no way to be sure that we will be paid for our work. The risk increases especially if we are promised payouts a few months after the end of the bounty.
-
In the old days when during 2017-2018 a lot of new projects started an ICO and bounty campaigns but that year the participants are not as many as this time. This time a lot of new projects only give a worthless token and many of them end up being scams since many new projects only want investor money. I agree when bounties are not dead but more like it's not that good anymore like the old days.
-
In the old days when during 2017-2018 a lot of new projects started an ICO and bounty campaigns but that year the participants are not as many as this time. This time a lot of new projects only give a worthless token and many of them end up being scams since many new projects only want investor money. I agree when bounties are not dead but more like it's not that good anymore like the old days.
I think bounty manager should have negotiation for the team project to allocate more funds.
Because if bounty campaign is unprovitable, It will be leaved by participants.
They prefer do day trading than parcipate in bounty campaign.
-
if you want to join bounty that not yet listed in any exchanges, make sure to read their roadmap and whitepaper so that you know which project is good and even you received no value token after all, at least you can assure that in the future it will gain value more than what they promised on their campaign, hence, if you see it that they don't have plan to priority the listing then ignore it coz for sure it's totally shitcoin forever. So be smart enough when it comes choosing a bounty.
-
I'm sorry I don't think so. NOW The bounty of hunting is not beneficial. Because very few projects are like this. who succeed. and gives profits. There is cheating in some. Getting a good payment is a bit difficult.
-
hello i think There is no profit for the Bunty Hunter. He is just wasting his time. It was good before. But now the scam is getting bigger. This is my belief. , Cause I'm a dwarf hunter myself
-
Indeed, signature campaigns pay high when compared to social media campaigns. Even my biggest paycheck is when I follow the signature campaign and also make articles from the bounties that I follow. Moreover, the number of participants in the signature campaign was not as many as those who took part in the social media campaign.
-
Indeed, signature campaigns pay high when compared to social media campaigns. Even my biggest paycheck is when I follow the signature campaign and also make articles from the bounties that I follow. Moreover, the number of participants in the signature campaign was not as many as those who took part in the social media campaign.
Yes I see ,social media campaign is lower allocation than signature campaign.
But we must have high rank If we want to get stakes more in signature campaign.
For low rank, It's also will get low.
-
Indeed, signature campaigns pay high when compared to social media campaigns. Even my biggest paycheck is when I follow the signature campaign and also make articles from the bounties that I follow. Moreover, the number of participants in the signature campaign was not as many as those who took part in the social media campaign.
That's right, participating in signature campaigns requires more time and dedication, so it pays better. Many users prefer to engage only in social media campaigns because it is easier for them to do multiple clicks instead of writing articles or 10-12 posts per week. In the end, everything depends on the time available and the degree of confidence that the bounties can generate in each participant, that is why signature campaigns have always been the best paid as they require more time and effort.
-
If the Bounty Manager escrows payment in Top coins like Ethereum, Binance, and USDT it will be very good for the bounty hunters they can join such bounties without any fear at least they will be sure that they will get something at the end of the campaign instead of scam but it's not even easy for the Bounty managers to get escrow payments in the top coins.
-
If the Bounty Manager escrows payment in Top coins like Ethereum, Binance, and USDT it will be very good for the bounty hunters they can join such bounties without any fear at least they will be sure that they will get something at the end of the campaign instead of scam but it's not even easy for the Bounty managers to get escrow payments in the top coins.
I think It more safe if bounty manager escrows the top coins.
But several projects team also didn't want to do.
We all see several bounty projects were worthless.
It's really annoying
-
I think It more safe if bounty manager escrows the top coins.
But several projects team also didn't want to do.
We all see several bounty projects were worthless.
It's really annoying
That is the solution, pay bounty hunters with BTC, ETH or USDT for example, but it is something that I have rarely seen. The teams prefer to "cover" their backs by paying with coins or tokens of the project itself in case they do not reach the financing they need, in this way they could return the funds to the investors and cancel the project. This problem will always exist until bounty managers get more serious and only do escrow bounties, but that's also hard to achieve as many bounty managers don't even try.
-
I think It more safe if bounty manager escrows the top coins.
But several projects team also didn't want to do.
We all see several bounty projects were worthless.
It's really annoying
That is the solution, pay bounty hunters with BTC, ETH or USDT for example, but it is something that I have rarely seen. The teams prefer to "cover" their backs by paying with coins or tokens of the project itself in case they do not reach the financing they need, in this way they could return the funds to the investors and cancel the project. This problem will always exist until bounty managers get more serious and only do escrow bounties, but that's also hard to achieve as many bounty managers don't even try.
Escrow in top coins are the best way to reduce scam projects.
As you said, It's rarely seen.
Because bounty campaign is promotion, So the team project will give us their tokens .
-
I think It more safe if bounty manager escrows the top coins.
But several projects team also didn't want to do.
We all see several bounty projects were worthless.
It's really annoying
That is the solution, pay bounty hunters with BTC, ETH or USDT for example, but it is something that I have rarely seen. The teams prefer to "cover" their backs by paying with coins or tokens of the project itself in case they do not reach the financing they need, in this way they could return the funds to the investors and cancel the project. This problem will always exist until bounty managers get more serious and only do escrow bounties, but that's also hard to achieve as many bounty managers don't even try.
Escrow in top coins are the best way to reduce scam projects.
As you said, It's rarely seen.
Because bounty campaign is promotion, So the team project will give us their tokens .
obviously it will be difficult if it is indeed escrow by giving using the best coin or maybe what makes more sense is with a stable coin. since they themselves raise funds to run the project they promote, so obviously they will give the coins they work on for bounty payments.
it's not easy to eliminate a fraudulent project even though you've done escrow, because you can still do things that are not wise later. there are many ways to not be able to pay for bounty hunters, and that will be done by deceitful Devs.
-
it's not easy to eliminate a fraudulent project even though you've done escrow, because you can still do things that are not wise later. there are many ways to not be able to pay for bounty hunters, and that will be done by deceitful Devs.
I think escrow is the best way to reduce scam projects, I agree with this opinions.
But I also agre with there are many ways to not be able for bounty hunters, It depends on bounty manager and the project team.
-
Until now the bounty is still alive but only the payout factor has decreased compared to 2017 during the Ico hype, but certain bounty projects are still generating high income such as the last bounty hex and vulcan getting an estimate of more than $1k for the lowest income.
-
In bounty campaigns, I see a problem not only with small rewards, but also with very small numbers of signing campaigns among new projects. Very often this forum has one or two signature campaigns. All other bounty campaigns are held in other categories, mainly in social networks. It doesn't give us a choice. Perhaps that is why there is so little activity on the forum now. Of course, the bearish period also affects this. There are significantly fewer new campaigns.
-
I think the main issue is projects don't rate bounty hunters. Some of them just ignore the bounty hunters and bounty managers and continue the project as if nothing is happening. If there is a body or organization that arbitrates these disputes, it would be really welcome. Projects like Student Coin, Digibits etc would be forced to pay up
-
the problem that occurs in the bounty campaign is that the prizes are small but there are also some with high payouts, and I think right now hunting for good bounties is very difficult and there are also some who don't pay
-
for altcoin bounty reward is very difficult. Is the project leader confident that their project will be successful and does not appear to need a community of people to participate?
I wonder why everyone follows scammers, bounty hunters should be rewarded for promotion or advertising. Today's new projects whether fundamentally strong or unclear projects have the same problem being a con. maybe their coins will be adopted by people who are not deceived.
-
Projects that have a lot of Funds will do marketing without worrying when the team distributes their tokens, as I've seen, some projects that have good partners will provide updates on the progress of their projects.
The Bounty Manager in this case can enter into an escrow or agreement with stable coin payments if the token price falls due to the massive sale of the whales
-
When projects don't pay for the work that the Bautists did, it's not very good to see such projects from the manager. When there are payments of projects that are traded on the market as planned, there are few such projects.
-
Until now the bounty is still alive but only the payout factor has decreased compared to 2017 during the Ico hype, but certain bounty projects are still generating high income such as the last bounty hex and vulcan getting an estimate of more than $1k for the lowest income.
Yes, if earlier teams allocated several hundred thousand dollars in their new tokens for bounty campaigns, now it is only a few thousand dollars, and this amount is rather conditional, given that after the listing this amount can decrease even tenfold. In addition, many teams now do not indicate the likely price in dollars, but only the amount of their tokens. We begin to work often without having the slightest idea about the amount of the upcoming reward.
-
First of all getting a bounty is not easy for all the BM. No matter how big their reputation in the forum but still it's hard for them to collect bounty. In this case, BM mostly time look for their Fees first and later its come about Escrow agreement . If any project team agreed to pay the fees and come to escrow agreement , the BM take the deal.
In this case, all the hunters should have little research about the project. Because I seen most of the bounty hunter do not look to the project anymore. Even they do not open the project website and thus they get scammed later.
-
Projects that have a lot of Funds will do marketing without worrying when the team distributes their tokens, as I've seen, some projects that have good partners will provide updates on the progress of their projects.
The Bounty Manager in this case can enter into an escrow or agreement with stable coin payments if the token price falls due to the massive sale of the whales
correctly. hunters in particular will assess and of course the project will get exposure, if you do marketing, of course you have to be sporty by distributing the tokens to participants, even though it can be fraudulent but it will worsen their reputation.
-
I think bounty is the last century and has already lost all relevance
-
First of all getting a bounty is not easy for all the BM. No matter how big their reputation in the forum but still it's hard for them to collect bounty. In this case, BM mostly time look for their Fees first and later its come about Escrow agreement . If any project team agreed to pay the fees and come to escrow agreement , the BM take the deal.
In this case, all the hunters should have little research about the project. Because I seen most of the bounty hunter do not look to the project anymore. Even they do not open the project website and thus they get scammed later.
You're right there are many scammers projects there
Sure, bounty projects.
I think we can't do research firstly because several BM just share bounty project project quickly and approve the participants that join first.
-
First of all getting a bounty is not easy for all the BM. No matter how big their reputation in the forum but still it's hard for them to collect bounty. In this case, BM mostly time look for their Fees first and later its come about Escrow agreement . If any project team agreed to pay the fees and come to escrow agreement , the BM take the deal.
In this case, all the hunters should have little research about the project. Because I seen most of the bounty hunter do not look to the project anymore. Even they do not open the project website and thus they get scammed later.
You're right there are many scammers projects there
Sure, bounty projects.
I think we can't do research firstly because several BM just share bounty project project quickly and approve the participants that join first.
These days i can't count the number of scam bounties. Even some bounty managers are scammy. Latest is Bevery who conducted the Avocado and Asix bounties. Went dark since the bounty ended. With hunters not getting any payments. Sad that one can waste time for nothing these days
-
Recently many bounties have not been paid to the hunters and it's really very hurting when all efforts go in vain due to dev intention not to pay. There should be a place on the forum where we can complain about the non-payment to the hunters. Now Bounty Managers put a disclaimer on the thread that they are not responsible for the payments so one can not blame the BM but BM or forum can make a rule that only escrow bounties will be displayed on the forum so that the bounty hunters' efforts will not be wasted.
-
what's worse is it happens over and over again, is there any way in the future to deal with this scam? dev is currently racing to be a cheater.
I really like the Bounty Manager putting a disclaimer or fraudulent project in the thread, and saying that they are not responsible and don't pay to hunters. I personally do not blame BM, they have also done their best.
-
In this case, all the hunters should have little research about the project. Because I seen most of the bounty hunter do not look to the project anymore. Even they do not open the project website and thus they get scammed later.
You're right there are many scammers projects there
Sure, bounty projects.
I think we can't do research firstly because several BM just share bounty project project quickly and approve the participants that join first.
[/quote]
There should have some change on bounty campaign now. Did you notice that project owner start to lose interest on the bounty campaign? But why? I have taken a little bit research about it. mostly the bounty manager do not check the bounty participants task properly , especially on bounty hunters tweet they even do not mention the project name but they write shit thing. But still bounty BM accept them. BM should be strict in bounty task and on project.
[/quote]
-
Or maybe bounties have simply been reborn into ambassador programs, because time does not stand still and, frankly, the old promotion tools simply stop working.
-
Or maybe bounties have simply been reborn into ambassador programs, because time does not stand still and, frankly, the old promotion tools simply stop working.
Bounty work should be rebranded because days going on bounty campaign become worst and worst. Even the bounty hunter do not read the bounty rule at all. They just go to the bounty thread and reply their registration form like shit. Even i seen some of them write registration form on the signature campaign. What kind of stupidity is it ? This mindset should be changed.
-
What do you think is the right solution to overcome this stupidity.
-
It looks like it will be difficult to get a bounty project that uses a payout of USDT, BNB or stable coins. If there is a possibility the prizes given are very limited and only a few participants who meet the criteria can participate. If this keeps happening like giving shitcoins, I think the interest to participate will decrease
-
Some bounties are good and some are bad. Its not the bounties its the projects they run away that dont provide us payments of our hard work.
-
has now implemented escrow to ensure the project pays the bounty participants. it's just that the coins or tokens will be of value or not when they are on the market. no one can guarantee and promise they will be successful
-
Yes, many bounty projects are now doing scams with hunters, we as hunters work for weeks but get nothing. We can't just say to bounty manager because there is clearly mentioned in ever bounty, payment not guaranteed by bounty manager, and it is also mentioned "Join at our own risk".
It is our responsibility to find legit bounty and join.
-
-
Bounty work should be rebranded because days going on bounty campaign become worst and worst. Even the bounty hunter do not read the bounty rule at all. They just go to the bounty thread and reply their registration form like shit. Even i seen some of them write registration form on the signature campaign. What kind of stupidity is it ? This mindset should be changed.
This commonly will depend on the Bounty Manager itself. many tp BM is still working on certain regulations and easy enough. but some other BMs are also so complciated.
But what I think right now is that bounty right now is less interesting moreover because this is in the bear market. So, many worry about the projects that are promoted in bounty will be really succeful or not.
-
Bounty payments nowadays are peanuts, all the bm tend to take advance work without any weekly payment setup, or most of the bounties are not escrowed in the end which results in companies refusing to pay hunters for their hard work at last moment, in my opinion, bitcointalk and altcoin talk should not allow any random person to generate a bounty thread, they should be kyced and escrowed before organizing bounties.
-
Bounty payments nowadays are peanuts, all the bm tend to take advance work without any weekly payment setup, or most of the bounties are not escrowed in the end which results in companies refusing to pay hunters for their hard work at last moment, in my opinion, bitcointalk and altcoin talk should not allow any random person to generate a bounty thread, they should be kyced and escrowed before organizing bounties.
I prefer that payment be given directly to the bounty manager or to the escrowerd. At least this gives a sense of security that the bounty that is run will really pay off the participants.
-
If the project is escrowed it would be good for all even we can not fully blame the Bounty Manager they are also like us it is also our duty to check the projects properly before participating. It would be a good idea if we get rewards in USDT, Eth, or BNB at least we will get something for sure.
-
I think the bounty payments are a great idea. They provide an incentive for people to report bugs and vulnerabilities, and help to make software more secure.
Bounty payments also help to raise awareness of security issues, and can encourage people to take action to fix them. In some cases, bounty payments can also help to fund security research.
I also think bounty payments are a great way to improve software security, and I encourage companies to consider offering them!
-
And how can generous payouts help software security ? Generous payments are good only to the one to whom they are paid.
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
Therefore, " Join at your own risk " That's what you want to convey here in your comment Sir. But from another angle, I also understood the condition of a Bounty Manager, although I am not a BM. It also appears that all the bounty campaigns that appear here are not guaranteed to pay you if you are a participant who will campaign the new project. Apparently, the only ones who really make money are the bounty managers who manage a campaign project, pay or not to the bounty hunters or participants who promote new projects, in the end, the BM is still paid. Of course, the BMs will not agree to start managing a campaign immediately without upfront giving to them, they can be given full or half right away. That's what I know anyway.
-
We were there before. Today, nothing has change.
Managers cannot guarantee the 100% that the project team will pay the hunters according to the said schedule whatever the result.
Managers didn't promise the profitable payment.
Hunters should know from the very beginning that everything is subject to change (it depends).
Although we wasted sweat and blood, yet we're responsible to join any project. They never force us. It is/was our decision willingly to take part.
Therefore, " Join at your own risk " That's what you want to convey here in your comment Sir. But from another angle, I also understood the condition of a Bounty Manager, although I am not a BM. It also appears that all the bounty campaigns that appear here are not guaranteed to pay you if you are a participant who will campaign the new project. Apparently, the only ones who really make money are the bounty managers who manage a campaign project, pay or not to the bounty hunters or participants who promote new projects, in the end, the BM is still paid. Of course, the BMs will not agree to start managing a campaign immediately without upfront giving to them, they can be given full or half right away. That's what I know anyway.
Compared to the bounty campaigns of 2017, the situation has changed in many ways, and not for the better. Previously, the entire reward pool went to the signature campaign and was often measured in hundreds of thousands of dollars. Even an ordinary member received several thousand dollars for participating in the campaign. There were no other duties, such as registering on telegrams and social networks and performing certain actions, except for writing posts. Now, 4-5 thousand dollars are allocated for the reward pool, while only one thousand dollars is allocated for the signature campaign. There are very few signature campaigns themselves, and therefore the choice is not the same.
-
Often I see that two years ago the bounty payment was very good, compared to this time there were very few scams. Now scams are more, some bounty programs hang in the balance, and the payment is less than before.
-
Often I see that two years ago the bounty payment was very good, compared to this time there were very few scams. Now scams are more, some bounty programs hang in the balance, and the payment is less than before.
bounties disappeared not so much because of scammers, but because they have changed and in fact are now called the ambassador program... in fact, it is a natural process of evolution.