Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Domithra on August 27, 2019, 05:46:40 AM
-
As crypto gets exposed to the world gradually, new and more convenient features enter the market. Initial Exchange Offerings are taking over with their planned and well structured activities which put the whole project on checks and make sure investors get their holdings after making the buy orders. Again, the coin gets the opportunity to be listed on that exchange which facilitate immediate trading if not planned otherwise by the team.
In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs. What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?
-
ICO had a golden time, in late 2017 and 2018, when the BTC price reached ATH $20,000 USD. About 5-10% of ICO projects are still active & start to have the first products to serve the economy. STO and IEO currently dominate the capital mobilization market, but if ICO projects in the past show their strength & value, the ICO season will be back and stronger than ever.
-
A lot depends on the companies themselves and their products, because if the company has a completely original product and big investors see and understand this, they will invest in the company even if this company holds an ICO and not IEO. IEO is currently more profitable for all investors and more reliable.
-
I hope for state regulation of the ICO, in which the authorized state bodies will check and register the team of each project, which should drastically reduce the level of fraud among them. I also expect general rules for conducting ICOs, where I think that the rules for relations with participants in ICO bounty campaigns will be spelled out. Indeed, now it is absolute chaos, where each team at any time at its discretion changes any rules. This should not be.
-
Even as it stand in the current crypto ecosystem, ICOs are still working and it has not left the market. Obviously, ICOs has some notable setback but few project are been launch by ICOs option, though IEOs has gain alot of ground in many start-up projects.i think there are still room for ICOs to gaining back it usual positions in projects launch.
If scams could be eliminated from the ecosystem, i think ICOs could regain it full statute.
-
A lot depends on the companies themselves and their products, because if the company has a completely original product and big investors see and understand this, they will invest in the company even if this company holds an ICO and not IEO. IEO is currently more profitable for all investors and more reliable.
A working product with high level of demand on the market is very important for the survival and success of a project and its token sales irrespective of being an ICO, STO or IEO. However, for ICOs to come back in the game in general, ICOs must go beyond just a working product but need to be restructured with regulations in other to eliminate the frequent scam projects.
-
You got to understand that everything is good at certain time, it just can’t be like that again. If you were in 2015, you were in 2015 only once, you can’t be back in that year again. So once something is done, it’s just done. ICOs can’t get the kind of popularity it had in past, as it’s past that zone now. In current times, there are new terms like STO or IEO. And in future, there is likely to be something else, there is no way time is going to reverse. So we just got to keep on moving instead of waiting for same thing again, just so vital to understand the Bitcoin History (https://cryptolinks.com/900/historyofbitcoin), to help you with so many things.
-
You got to understand that everything is good at certain time, it just can’t be like that again. If you were in 2015, you were in 2015 only once, you can’t be back in that year again. So once something is done, it’s just done. ICOs can’t get the kind of popularity it had in past, as it’s past that zone now. In current times, there are new terms like STO or IEO. And in future, there is likely to be something else, there is no way time is going to reverse. So we just got to keep on moving instead of waiting for same thing again, just so vital to understand the Bitcoin History (https://cryptolinks.com/900/historyofbitcoin), to help you with so many things.
Of course, traveling back in time is not possible but history can always repeat itself and even in a more better way. This is one of the reasons why Bitcoin enthusiasts still hold on to Bitcoin with the believe that Bitcoin can repeat its ATH of $20K and even beyond. I'm totally not in support with the idea that ICOs cannot get back in the game once it had its time. What ICOs need now is restructuring its activities in order to put few things to checks especially placing checks on projects to eliminate fake/scam projects.
-
the basic thing from the current decline in ICO is the decline in global crypto prices and also too many ICO players who are increasingly making investors think again for investment. for that we need standard rules on ICO to minimize ICO fraud and I hope they return to shine like before 2018
-
When there will be many good projects born from ICOs, then people may be interested in joining ICOs again. If people are interested in joining ICOs, it means ICOs probably to have a good future. But it won't be easy to make people be interested again after there were too many shit ICO projects so far.
-
When there will be many good projects born from ICOs, then people may be interested in joining ICOs again. If people are interested in joining ICOs, it means ICOs probably to have a good future. But it won't be easy to make people be interested again after there were too many shit ICO projects so far.
That's right I absolutely agree with your idea . If some project can attract many people to join, surely the ICO will be good, can survive and compete and can develop in the future
-
I think it is very difficult to be repeated again. The possibility could be if it is replaced with new packaging and a new logo. I am sure, the bounty hunters have already been hurt by their hearts.
-
In the near future, the ICO is unlikely to return, because now the trend is IEO, and if someone invests, it often chooses IEO, because they are considered more secure. Scam projects greatly undermined the credibility of ICOs, so investors are more cautious about ICOs.
-
IEO is the same ICO but with slightly different characteristics, so I think that ICO will change the form of fundraising, but will continue to exist. I think that for startups, ICO is a good way to raise the required amount in a short period of time. But with the regulation of the ICOs market, interest in investing in them will grow.
-
In the near future, the ICO is unlikely to return, because now the trend is IEO, and if someone invests, it often chooses IEO, because they are considered more secure. Scam projects greatly undermined the credibility of ICOs, so investors are more cautious about ICOs.
In my opinion, it is enough that states begin to regulate the activities of ICOs and again they will be able to revive again very quickly. Enough now through such regulation to remove the high level of fraud among ICO projects, and their popularity will again rise to almost the same level.
-
The popularity of ICO has really been broken and destroyed because of the many ICO Projects that are SCAM. And this makes investors really angry about this ICO sales system. Therefore there is no need for improvements or rules regarding the ICO project because there is now an IEO sales system which has advantages when compared to ICO. And if ICO gets up again, there will be few investors who will trust and participate in it, I'm sure of that.
-
The popularity of ICO has really been broken and destroyed because of the many ICO Projects that are SCAM. And this makes investors really angry about this ICO sales system. Therefore there is no need for improvements or rules regarding the ICO project because there is now an IEO sales system which has advantages when compared to ICO. And if ICO gets up again, there will be few investors who will trust and participate in it, I'm sure of that.
Why are you so sure? Maybe they will be fine?
-
In my opinion, for ICO projects to begin to regain their popularity, state regulation of this type of activity is necessary. This will virtually eliminate fraud and streamline the rights and obligations of participants.
-
ICO's destroyed themselves, because they were scam projects. Investors, lost money, bounty hunters not payed, and many more. The great problem with trust. So hard to obtain, so easy, to be lost.
-
ICOs is not really recommended to join for now. So, I think it is better to choose others. We have IEOs and STOs, I think those are better choices than joining ICOs. Since too many failed ICO projects, I think we must be very careful. Moreover, there are many scams ICOs also, it is a warning for all crypto investors.
-
In the near future, the ICO is unlikely to return, because now the trend is IEO, and if someone invests, it often chooses IEO, because they are considered more secure. Scam projects greatly undermined the credibility of ICOs, so investors are more cautious about ICOs.
-
I think that for ICOs to come back, since it is mainly hijacked by scammers, it need some form of regulation or a governing body to sreen the new start-up projects developments plus physically to know team members. I believe that if some form of governing body is esterbilish to monitor ICOs, investors may be interested to come back.
-
Another way to increase the value of the ICO project is to maximize the technology they plan to give hope to investors to benefit in the future. This will increase the interest and price of tokens or coins on the exchange
-
Frankly speaking, the popularity is still there but time changes and that can never come back. Now all the ICOs go into IEO phase instead of the actual way that was popular previously. And this is simply to do with changing time and changing needs. There are some very finest Upcoming ICOs (https://cryptolinks.com/ico) that are sure-shot success, so it’s just about checking out those and sticking with them to benefit instead of picking up anything randomly which leads to no results at all.
-
ICO is still good to run, but the developers who are really part of the team need to make changes such as holding meetings with investors and making agreements if the project fails and does not reach the target then they will return the funds they received to the investors, things this will make the crypto world more open to everyone who wants to know crypto better and will become a new crypto investor
-
ICO may return to the game if the crypto market will start to grow again,when investors will have an interest and when there will be clear laws protecting the rights of the latter.
Projects should be opened to investors. Investors should be guaranteed protection from a Scam.
Only in a fair and open game, we can hope to achieve full synergy between the projects and the crypto community.
-
ICO projects can regain their popularity if this type of activity begins to be regulated by states and their bodies. If the relevant state bodies will check the members of the ICO team, register their data and establish clear rights and obligations of the participants in the ICO relations, fraud in these projects will practically disappear. If the problem with fraud is resolved, then nothing will prevent ICO projects from developing further.
-
The main problem facing ico projects is because people are afraid because their bad encounter in some ico project that run away with their fund that's why it look like people are shifting their interest in investing through ico, for me I think for ico to come alive they should regulate crypto projects.
-
The main problem facing ico projects is because people are afraid because their bad encounter in some ico project that run away with their fund that's why it look like people are shifting their interest in investing through ico, for me I think for ico to come alive they should regulate crypto projects.
It will take a long time before these regulations implemented. Drafting of it will also take time, so implementation will occur much further, but I do hope they will expedite what is needed to be done so those government officials can stop acting like crypto has been a virus they needed to take away. I do know that some of the market has been struggling but that's how decentralized work no one interfere. Depends on the users if the demand for project is high or not.
-
ICOs are no longer necessary for investors and I don’t think that investors would want ICOs to come back again, as it was before, because now 99% of companies that conduct ICOs are scams or do not collect softcap, so let the IEO era completely close the ICO.
-
ICOs are no longer necessary for investors and I don’t think that investors would want ICOs to come back again, as it was before, because now 99% of companies that conduct ICOs are scams or do not collect softcap, so let the IEO era completely close the ICO.
Not all ICO projects are scam, there are still many new projects that have good ideas and run ICO, IEO does not guarantee the project runs well because there are still IEOs that end fraud, to increase investor confidence, ideas and real products every altcoin needed
-
If the whole world will recognize cryptocurrency and the legalization of cryptocurrency will begin, then again cryptocurrency companies will conduct ICOs and it will be much safer to invest in ICOs because cryptocurrency will be legalized.
-
ICO is just a trick to create something that does not exist and in the form of altcoins, if investors feel scared by the altcoins that are developed or the ICO will not succeed, it will happen called Dump.
I am sure that with the dump it will make the ICO results altcoins will not get back support from investors.
-
Like it or not, ICOs helped a lot with spreading out cryptocurrency concept to people. As an investor, I wish ICOs would come back. But in the past, many investors lost their money to scammed ICOs, thus we need a fair and more secured form of ICOs. Even IEOs can't fully meet these requirements. The only way for ICOs to comeback, IMO, is they must be backed by well known and reliable companies.
-
ICO projects can return and become popular again if states begin to regulate this type of activity and with the help of such regulation the level of fraud is eliminated or significantly reduced.
ICO projects are still the main way to develop cryptocurrency.
-
I think not to return ICO to the game, since they die (because there are a lot of scammers and so on). Therefore, only IEO will soon exist, because it is much more convenient and simpler. Or maybe something else will come up, as our modern world does not stand still.
-
I think not to return ICO to the game, since they die (because there are a lot of scammers and so on). Therefore, only IEO will soon exist, because it is much more convenient and simpler. Or maybe something else will come up, as our modern world does not stand still.
If governments will begin to regulate cryptocurrencies, then again a lot of cryptocurrency companies will start conducting ICOs and investors will no longer be afraid to invest in ICOs, but for now, IEO is currently safer and always brings profit to investors and the companies that conducts IEOs.
-
history will not be repeated the same as 2017, currently there are more fraudulent projects than projects that are running according to the original goal, ICO can return and be in demand by its lovers if the products offered are real and develop according to the roadmap
-
I think not to return ICO to the game, since they die (because there are a lot of scammers and so on). Therefore, only IEO will soon exist, because it is much more convenient and simpler. Or maybe something else will come up, as our modern world does not stand still.
The advent of IEO really made investing safer, but the problem is that IEO does not guarantee that the investor will profit, many IEOs have been unsuccessful. Probably only at Binance a high percentage of successful IEOs that brought profit to investors.
-
At present only a few projects still use ICO. ICO will no longer be used. Because IEO is more practical and safer than ICO. If the project carries out IEO, the exchange site will be responsible for the sale of tokens. Therefore, there have been many exchanges that require KYC. So that investors be don't worry if any projects a run away that carry off the money from the sale of tokens.
-
Many investors buy into ICOs in the hopes of quick and powerful returns on their investments. But they are largely unregulated. And since they are not regulated by financial authorities, funds that are lost due to fraud may never be recovered.
-
IMHO, its very hard for any ICO to survive in these kind of market situation, Aside from these reality, the damage has been done by those scammers that evenly swept the entire ICO market, and if you compare now, ICO's is not popular anymore and it was slowly replace by other form of fundraising these time it was and IEO.
-
The only way that ICO projects can regain their former popularity is to eliminate or at least reduce the level of fraud among such projects. Only states can cope with scammers if they organizationally regulate the activities of ICOs.
-
The only way that ICO projects can regain their former popularity is to eliminate or at least reduce the level of fraud among such projects. Only states can cope with scammers if they organizationally regulate the activities of ICOs.
This means, there must be an organization that provides rules for ICO in the coming year if it wants to be held again. It is better if the association is drawn from a number of countries that successfully held ICOs in previous years and those that failed last year so that it can be seen what needs to be done so that ICO can be popular again.
-
to raise the ICO degree, my suggestion is more to the project and its functions. the rest remains in terms of team and good management.
besides that there must also be interesting innovations so that investors can glance at ICO.
-
In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.
I am interested in this opinion, especially with the regulation you stated above. Can you explain what kind of regulation do you mean here? Will ICO have some institutions to control ICO's activities? I think we will lose the anonymity if there will be a regulation. And "structures" for what?
-
As we can see, the ICO season is coming back and coexisting with IEO & STO, however the interest in IEO is greater than the ICO, and IEO is also the choice of the majority of new projects to proceed token-sale.
Comparing in detail, conducting an ICO will be cheaper than IEO because the team does not have to pay a large amount to conduct token-sale on an exchange like IEO. On the level of risk: I have seen many IEO fail :)
We hope that the market will warm up and ICO/IEO/STO will have a good development season.
-
All the scam projects destroyed the reputation of ICOs, for ICOs to come back into the game and be successful again; the team will need to prove themselves beyond reasonable doubt. Either by securing reputable confirmed partnership or advisors. They also really need to bring a unique solution to the table and not another copycat. It's not going to be easy as ICOs era has passed
-
Since now there is a lot IEO with easy to buy a coin, ICO is no longer hype like before. IEO is offer more than ICO, people can buy it safely in reputable exchange. I think it's hard for ICO to come back.
-
In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.
I am interested in this opinion, especially with the regulation you stated above. Can you explain what kind of regulation do you mean here? Will ICO have some institutions to control ICO's activities? I think we will lose the anonymity if there will be a regulation. And "structures" for what?
New ICO projects can again gain their popularity if state regulation of this type of activity is established. I mean organizational regulation, in which states will not delve into the ICO process itself. This can be the registration of these projects and their teams, the issuance of licenses for the ICO, in which each member of the ICO team will be properly identified. At the same time, fraud should be reduced to a minimum.
-
It's all about the market conditions right now with all the DeFi hype some Ico have a real succesfull ,for example Avalanche have a public token sale on 15 July and raise $42 million in just 4 hours and half.
-
I don't know how can lift up the ICO again because it's already damaged by the scammers. I guess IEO in the big exchanges is highly chances of success of the project so it's profitable.
-
Transparency, like a blockchain network. And there must be an umbrella that is responsible for the clarity of the project that will run the ICO and the company is required to have run around 70% of the planning target, because many investors want the benefits and clarity of a project.
-
I don't know how can lift up the ICO again because it's already damaged by the scammers. I guess IEO in the big exchanges is highly chances of success of the project so it's profitable.
Aside from ICO bing scammers most of the time, the IO businesses ruined that niche for good.
Why would any newly launched crypto project make an ICO while he can make it on a decent, famous, big exchange, straight to the crypto communities.
IEO are making it more easy for crypto projects to market their business to the right audience, that's why ICO business is killed by KO.
-
I think ICO is no longer relevant. Functions are much more interesting and safer now.
-
I think it will be difficult for ICOs to come back stronger because investors already don't trust anymore in ICOs. Investors must choose IEOs with its better concept than ICOs. It listed the tokens from the beginning of fundraising, so investors are interested to join. They don't want to have tokens that cannot be listed in exchanges anymore like in ICOs.
-
Investors prefer to choose IEOs to put their funds nowadays. IEOs is more popular day after day, while ICOs is worse day by day. So, in this matter, ICOs seems to have no chance to come back to the game. People don't expect and believe in ICOs since they have many bad experinces with ICOs.
-
ICO's reputation was destroyed by rampant scam projects in the past and the impact still existing these days. I think it is difficult for ICO'S to come back because of investors bad impression from the past.
-
To me the major problem of ICO is the fraudulent activities that have taken over the system. ICO is very good to me but for scammers that are using it as a means to exploit investors. If we can take away the place of scammers then ICO can come back very strong. I prefer ICO to IEO, though it might sound funny but I have my reasons. Elimination of scammers will bring back ICO very strong. We still have some ICO running successfully anyway.
-
I don't think that ICO will rise up again because now it has been replaced by the IEO progress. And newly, the DeFi has been so popular with the new projects. So, if there are newer better ways of projects, shy should we back to the old ICO types?
-
I think for ico project to come back in the game all crypto projects that's under going through ico proccess should be examined to know how genuine they are to avoid scaming people before they will be allowed to raise fund because most of the cryptocurrency going through ico is just for self gain that's why people are not longer interested in investing through ico, that's what I think and that's the only way ico could come back to the game.
-
BRO is a new token-based fundraising mechanism that provides a sustainable alternative to the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) and Security Token (STO) Offers, also available. on the platform. Tools that allow users to drastically reduce pumping and dumping, limit volatility and promote growth by providing equal treatment to all contributors.
-
Crypto is all about trend, it has shifted from ICOs to IEO and IEOs are fading away with as time goes on. The new trend is Defi projects. ICOs is as good as dead.
-
This might actually not be possible anymore considering the different token models that have been introduced since the demise of ICOs. Initial Exchange Offerings have done well though they have been plagued by a lot of frauds by projects conniving with poorly designed and run exchanges and defrauding a lot of investors of their hard earned money. I believe the industry needs some form of stronger policies to deal with this issue of fraud associated with token offerings. For now, IEOs on the bigger exchanges is the only way to make people believe in token offerings again.
-
Who then set this standards and regulation. In crypto I think its a bit different. If so much regulation Still sets in then we lose the decentralisation that crypto is meant to be.
-
It is difficult to restore investors' confidence in ICO projects at this time. Investors are already disappointed with the many SCAM ICO projects. However, if the ICO project wants to return to take sympathy from investors again, then the ICO Project must provide a guarantee of obtaining tokens from payments by investors, and it must be certain or not. Or the project must send a token immediately after the Investor buys their token without having to wait long.
-
ICOs are not coming back easily now only way for ICOs to be back is if proper regulation is applied to raise funds by icos and to pass that certain criteria should be applied so that competent people and practical projects are given the license to raise funds only.
-
The special feature of The Abyss ICO project compared to other projects is that it uses a new and more advanced method of calling for payback than using DAICO. And The Abyss is also the first ICO project in the world to use DAICO, this is also the point that I personally highly appreciate this project and will invest heavily in it.