Should AI generated post be allowed here?

[Learn Bitcoin]

Are there reliable tools to check plagerism now? The last time I checked, those tools were all faulty and they could possibly categorise a human written text as AI generated.

To check plagiarism, I always use https://www.duplichecker.com/ and it works well for me. I have reported some plagiarism on Bitcointalk and here too. I hope you will find it useful. But, when you check plagiarism, make sure to check who is the main author and the creation date of the topic and the source too.

As you know, Plagiarism and AI-generated posts aren't the same. Even though some AI copy the sources from the internet. To check AI generated posts, I use https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector remember, sometimes It can I've you false positive.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Why is it that some find it so interesting in using AI to make posts, as for me, I see it as being synonymous to plagiarism because the original content is not something coming from one's personal efforts, instead it was copied from a bot, to an extent I expected the forum to go against the use of this, but if not, some of the signature campaigns here may not allow for that because they understand they can't pay for what others are posting which are not genuine but rather, a copy and paste from a bot called AI.

[Freemind]

Why is it that some find it so interesting in using AI to make posts, as for me, I see it as being synonymous to plagiarism because the original content is not something coming from one's personal efforts, instead it was copied from a bot, to an extent I expected the forum to go against the use of this, but if not, some of the signature campaigns here may not allow for that because they understand they can't pay for what others are posting which are not genuine but rather, a copy and paste from a bot called AI.

Some users may find it interesting to use AI bots for the simple fact that they do not have to put in the effort to reason out an answer and establish a conversation. As we have already said, these types of posts are not allowed on this forum. People talking to people. If a user is not willing to follow the rules, they have 2 options: change their mind and reason with their own posts or leave the forum.

[bayu7adi]

Why is it that some find it so interesting in using AI to make posts, as for me, I see it as being synonymous to plagiarism because the original content is not something coming from one's personal efforts, instead it was copied from a bot, to an extent I expected the forum to go against the use of this, but if not, some of the signature campaigns here may not allow for that because they understand they can't pay for what others are posting which are not genuine but rather, a copy and paste from a bot called AI.

Producing content with AI makes discussions stiffer and other people even think that it is not a two-way discussion, but like a discussion alone. As long as a signature campaign requires a progressive impact, campaign participants must also have the qualities to support this. I also really agree that original content has more value than copy paste content.

The punishment for those who use Bots or AI to produce content and copy it as posts on this forum, I think it is enough to give them a bad badge to mark them. That also reflects reputation, right?

[yahoo62278]

I personally am not a fan of AI when making posts. You're basically saying to a user, it's ok to not have your own thoughts, it's ok to not think for yourself. You can or should research a subject you want to post about or use grammar tools, but letting a bot make your post for you is total bullshit IMO.

Eventually they're going to figure out how to make a bot post period and stop hiring you folks to post. Think about that before you outsource yourselves out of a job.

[Jamal Aezaz]

Hi there.

I am sorry if there were similar threads or if it has been answered before. But, I have asked the question somewhere else and I didn't get the answer. I guess the admin or the president didn't see that. I would like to ask again if AI-generated content should be allowed or not. Generating content with AI and Copy pasting posts from other sources (Which is plagiarism) should be the similar (if not same) offense and they should be punished. I would like to hear the community feedback and comments from admin or officials would be appreciated.

This is mainly a discussion forum. i don't see any point of using AI to make posts because posts are mostly people's personal opinions or talking in different discussions. asking AI to write a reply to a post is simply dumb.
Using AI creating contents, articles, blogposts or even video content still make sense. but using AI for talking to another persons? nah. I would not support that.
Maybe you can use AI to fix your spelling and grammer mistakes. but no more than that.

[Jokers]

Maybe you can use AI to fix your spelling and grammer mistakes. but no more than that.

You can fix your grammar mistakes with services like Grammarly or the same. The chance of your text being detected as AI written with Grammarly doesn't increase and with AI usage does. So I don't recommend using AI for any post improvements on forums.

[Learn Bitcoin]

Why is it that some find it so interesting in using AI to make posts, as for me, I see it as being synonymous to plagiarism because the original content is not something coming from one's personal efforts, instead it was copied from a bot, to an extent I expected the forum to go against the use of this, but if not, some of the signature campaigns here may not allow for that because they understand they can't pay for what others are posting which are not genuine but rather, a copy and paste from a bot called AI.

It's simple bro. There are a lot of users who have more than one account and they have to write many posts for their signature campaign requirement. Now, if they want to write posts for their many accounts, they have to spend a couple of hours writing these posts. Instead, they use AI to write posts so they can generate more than ten posts within a couple of minutes.

Another reason is, that a person has to read the thread and replies to understand what is going on in a thread and they need time to write a constructive post. They use AI instead to generate a response to a post so they don't need to spend time on it.

[bitterguy28]

I think everyone here agrees that AI generated text shouldn't be here . Forum discussions are like sharing unique ideas or views from each member, and original posts are more appreciated everywhere. Each person has different skills, and that's what makes forum discussions unique.

The essence of discussions is to yield positive results, and usually, bots and AI don't have as good a sense as humans do.

Indeed  , what is the sense of us human being here when AI will be generated the posting , I mean what is the purpose of having accounts here to discuss things and share our knowledge and understanding when there are someone that will just take the idea over computers?

if that is the case then we should not be here and let the AI manage and runs this community .

[Freemind]

Indeed  , what is the sense of us human being here when AI will be generated the posting , I mean what is the purpose of having accounts here to discuss things and share our knowledge and understanding when there are someone that will just take the idea over computers?

if that is the case then we should not be here and let the AI manage and runs this community .

I could be wrong, but I think the purpose of these accounts (user accounts that use AI to generate posts) would be to simply use them for signature bounties. I think it would be convenient to propose to the administrator an avatar for users who use this type of tricks, that way the bounty managers could quickly identify them and not accept them in the campaigns, that way legitimate users would have the respect and the place that corresponds to them.

[kulkhan]

We know Al post created by bot. So it is not granted every where. Because AI has not own sense as like human being. It's like automated post, it consider as plagiarism. So i am not with AI post and i don support it. I always suggest everyone to creat own post which will by sense. We should avoid this AI generated post.

[SamReomo]

I think everyone here agrees that AI generated text shouldn't be here . Forum discussions are like sharing unique ideas or views from each member, and original posts are more appreciated everywhere. Each person has different skills, and that's what makes forum discussions unique.

The essence of discussions is to yield positive results, and usually, bots and AI don't have as good a sense as humans do.

Yeah, I highly agree with you and whatever you said is 100% accurate. In a forum like this we as humans discuss with each other and share our ideas and opinions, and knowledge about the things that we are good at.

AI isn't a human and it doesn't have any emotions and that's why whatever response it generates will purely be non-emotional and no sentimental. What could be the benefit of posts that are generated by an AI that's emotionless? I guess no benefits at all, and sometimes the AI gives fake information as well.

[Learn Bitcoin]

AI isn't a human and it doesn't have any emotions and that's why whatever response it generates will purely be non-emotional and no sentimental. What could be the benefit of posts that are generated by an AI that's emotionless? I guess no benefits at all, and sometimes the AI gives fake information as well.

Forget about emotions. Even if a person without emotion writes something informative, it's okay. But it's something about ethics as well. People copy pasting AI-generated content as their own. They pretend like they have written that on their own which is not true. It is similar to plagiarism. These posts add nothing special.

However, these AI bots often generate wrong information. I remember one of my shit poster country mates who used to use this AI to generate content. People were discussing about Bitcoin wallet in a Bitcointalk thread, and you will be surprised to hear how stupid he is. He gave a suggestion like they should wash their wallets to keep them clean. LOL.

[BitMaxz]

It's nice to hear that users who may use AI to grow their accounts will get punished for the act. Yeah, I agree a forum like this one would never want to have meaningless conversations between users and the posts that are created with AI are totally meaningless or somehow a type of plagiarism.

Not only that this forum will also be affected if most of the posts here are AI-generated and plagiarism it would affect the rankings on the SERP because if Google found out that most of the posts here on the forum are AI this forum might suffer and Google might deindex most of the posts.

Also sometimes AI-generated gives wrong information if someone keeps posting an AI-generated without removing those posts it might cause some confusion to those who read it. So those posts should be reported right away to mods to keep this forum clean from AI and plagiarism.

[Learn Bitcoin]

Not only that this forum will also be affected if most of the posts here are AI-generated and plagiarism it would affect the rankings on the SERP because if Google found out that most of the posts here on the forum are AI this forum might suffer and Google might deindex most of the posts.

I remember a forum named Bitcoingarden or something. I am not sure if I should call it as forum or a news site. That website is full of plagiarism and 99% of its content is posted on the BitcoinTalk press release section. But, I don't know if google or other search engines take any action against them or not. They are running their website well.

The website owner should do something on their own. Instead, they are paying to some spammer to collect news from other websites and post them on their own website without giving any credits and without doing any modification in the original text. How about that?