I could not understand why you are upset about kyc as now kyc is very rare for bounty hunters and its only for investors. Actually when they launch a project and if their govt give this kind of criteria, they have to quarey KYC as terms and conditions. I think we should take KYC as positive thing so that cheaters can avoid real men in bounty.
Actually, KYC is no problem if it's only for investors with certain goals that are an obligation, but for bounty hunters it will obviously be different, because many don't want KYC because they are just helping. The problem is that if it has been informed from the start that there is KYC, it is clearly not a problem, especially if it is immediately informed that KYC has passed or not, so that it can continue the bounty hunter, but if the information behind it is clear that there are bad intentions, they may not pass it for the purpose of not paying.
To me I don't think it is the KYC that is the issue per se but if the KYC will be demanded at the end of the bounty program. What will happen to the bounty hunters that would eventually not be able to do the KYC after they have finished all the bounty for the period? Would they miss out because they couldn't complete the KYC? I believe everything about the requirement to qualify as a participant in a bounty should be stated out from the begining.
That's right, indeed, if KYC is done after the project is finished, of course we can interpret something, there could be Dev's intention and the team really wants to reduce the bounty hunter recipients so they don't qualify. which obviously they can reduce the payment to bounty hunters. Of course this is clearly unfair and not commendable what they did. but this kind of behavior seems to have become a frequent goal.