I've worked in the Risk department of a CEX, and all transactions were analyzed by an AML/CTF algo. On the other hand, it's a set of factors more than the transaction itself that can lead to the transaction being frozen. Each user has a Risk Score based on the frequency of deposits/withdrawals, the amounts, the origin of deposits, their country of residence, and the SoF questionnaire they filled in on registration (income, expected volumes on the platform, etc.). Clearly, coins with a history with a casino or mixer aren't a problem if they're the user's only red flag, but if other flags are present, they'll use this as a pretext to justify asking for the origin of the funds.

Thank you for the very useful information. I had no idea how CEXs analyze and make decisions on user accounts. In the past, Binance has also frozen user BTC related to CoinJoin, so I am quite worried.

I hope that the silly proposal related to crypto Mixers will not be passed and users will have one less worry about Mixers.

---

• Binance Returns Frozen BTC After User ‘Promises’ Not to Use CoinJoin

So what am saying is this, we should focus more on building more knowledge about this crypto space. Like for instance we have pro and experienced traders here that can direct those who are interested in knowing about how trading work. And we also have  users here who are really good when it comes to securing of wallet and fixing of any technical issues, and some that can guide us when it comes to investing etc .

There are many members who have been active on AltcoinsTalks for many years now, even during the crypto winter and there are absolutely no bounty campaigns on the forum. Discussing the issues in the crypto market is also really interesting and necessary for our investment journey. Of course, everything will be better for AltcoinsTalks when bounty campaigns motivate members to be more active and create more interesting and useful content.

I believe that many of the views and knowledge shared on AltcoinsTalks are unique and will be valuable to someone in the present and in the future. To be honest, many times I have felt sorry for only reading useful shares after I lost money investing in a token, I wish I had the capital management and psychology experience like that before investing.

That's right, a scarcity of BNB will occur when the longer they burn BNB, the more difficult it will be to get BNB, ultimately making the price very expensive. For now, BNB may still have quite a lot of supply, but in the next 20 years, BNB will probably be very expensive. difficult to obtain and expensive.

In fact, as the price of BNB increases, Binance will buy back and burn less BNB, which means that the burn rate will also slow down and we will not see the total supply of BNB reach 50% anytime soon. At the same time, I think that 100M BNB is also enough to meet the usage needs of users in the BNB chain and opBNB ecosystem. Burning tokens can indeed increase the scarcity of BNB, but I think it has a stronger impact on the price in terms of marketing.

It would be too early to say whether BNB can reach a price of tens of thousands of $ in the future. I am only waiting for BNB to set a new ATH in this bullrun and possibly conquer the $1K price range in 2025.

$150k indeed would really be something realistic or something that achievable for this upcoming bull run. Somehow its not really that shocking that people would really be expecting more
but it would be better that you should be keeping low with your expectations so that you wont really be ending up on having that kind of frustration on the time that the price wont really be able to hit up those numbers. There are really just those people who are really that too positive when it comes to price predictions on which they do expect that much just like into those previous
bull runes. Well its not bad but for this time it would be better to keep or expect something low.

I believe that $150K is a reasonable expectation. It would be great if BTC could conquer higher price levels, but I would start taking profits when BTC reaches $150K-170K in this bullrun.

Based on historical precedent, I think BTC will not be able to break through $260K in this bullrun, so I only dare to set my expectations for the $160K zone. This could be the price zone where investor sentiment becomes volatile and they start to consider taking profits, creating a fairly wide distribution zone before the market enters crypto winter.

Memecoin cứ được tạo ra, những bơm thổi cứ được tiến hành thì cũng là điều tốt cho thị trường về mặt vốn hóa mà bác, còn ai được lời ai thua lỗ thì do năng lực đầu tư của họ quyết định. Em thấy làn sóng memecoin bây giờ tồn tại liên tục chứ không chỉ là trend ngắn hạn nữa, đủ để giúp cho thị trường sôi động và có câu chuyện để nhà đầu tư ở lại, không dời đi như nhiều giai đoạn trước. Những câu chuyện về người nào đó giàu có nhanh chóng nhờ 1 memecoin thực sự vẫn thu hút được lượt đọc, lượt chia sẻ và kích thích nhu cầu đầu tư vào thị trường này.

Thị trường tự do nên ai cũng có thể tạo ra dự án vui vẻ của riêng mình, nhất là memecoins chẳng cần có công nghệ hay giải pháp nào đặc biệt, chỉ cần vui vẻ, thú vị và được thao túng tốt trên đường giá là đủ để nhà đầu tư đến tìm kiếm cơ hội. Nhu cầu của các hệ sinh thái đối với memecoins cũng lớn để thúc đẩy tương tác, đốt thêm nhiều native token, đồng thời thu hút nhà đầu tư và người dùng tìm đến trải nghiệm những tính năng tốt nhất của họ.

Mình thực sự nghĩ chúng ta nên cẩn trọng với memecoins dù luôn công nhận những giá trị mà memecoins đang mang đến cho thị trường. Vốn nên được đầu tư vào top coins uy tín trong thị trường để đảm bảo an toàn và lợi nhuận chứ không nên may rủi cờ bạc với memecoins.

What looks surprising, that OP tried to add latest popular meme coins, but ignored dogecoin or shiba inu. I think that dogecoin has more chances to gain than any of the mentioned in voting meme coin. During all those years, despite everything that happens to the market, dogecoin still manage to gain. The year 2025 is still far away, but old meme coins will not be in trend. For example in US, president election will happen in November and today market is pumping Trump related meme coins. Find out what is going to happen in 2025 and related to that meme coins will be pumped.

Yeah, I also want to vote for DOGE because I believe that DOGE will still be the memecoin with the largest marketcap in the memecoin trend. DOGE has also just been accepted by Tesla, and there is a great chance that it will be accepted by X-payment, we should not forget this famous memecoin! Creating memecoins has become extremely easy in many ecosystems, so we can see many memecoins related to elections or something crazy and fun in the bullrun. Their prices can increase x100, but I don't think their marketcap can exceed DOGE marketcap.

For now, my attention and capital is not on memecoins, I will only start thinking about them in the bullrun and only invest in the top memecoins which are DOGE, SHIB and PEPE, the other memecoins are too risky and not attractive enough for me.

Just to clarify, I only meant pure supply/demand market mechanisms, not the psychological effect (such as losing confidence etc).

Let's try to break it down:
So what would happen if such dump caused the price of shares to go below the price of bitcoin (ie. they would be traded below company's market value)? If the arbitrage could be applied, i.e. new shareholders could force the company to sell bitcoins - then all is clear. But if new shareholders could not make the decision to sell, then the only impact on BTC price would be that some potential BTC buyers would choose to buy cheaper company shares instead (so reducing demand for BTC and causing the price to drop).

I can't think of any other factors.

I think it is normal for Saylor to sell MSTR. The market is maintained by the buying and selling of assets, and Saylor is also an investor. He has the right to sell his shares when he needs to.

This decision could have a temporary negative impact on MSTR price and cause MSTR investors to worry that something negative is about to happen to the stock. However, this decision has no direct impact on BTC and the crypto market because MS has not sold any BTC.

In fact, we can believe that Saylor is selling MSTR to continue accumulating BTC himself, as Saylor is known as BTC diamond hands in the market. This could boost investor confidence and optimism in BTC, giving them more reasons to invest more in BTC, driving up BTC price.

Someone gave their views on Bitcoin price movements after the halving via their social media account. He is a trading expert from my country and also actively provides signals for paid trading.

For all of you, is it patent to rely on the price change pattern of previous halvings?

We see that the BTC price graph is almost similar to the data from the BTC price graph during the previous halving. So, what makes you want to hold or add more accumulation? Are you guided by the charts alone or are there other things that you think have a big influence on Bitcoin?

I like this trading idea, and I also see the coincidence of this cycle with the cycle 2016: we have a strong and continuous recovery of BTC instead of a sharp drop right before the halving like the cycle 2020. I expect BTC to re-accumulate over the next few weeks, even until the end of Q3 this year, before growing sustainably and creating a bull run in Q4 2024-Q1 2025.

The only unusual thing is that the new ATH was made before the halving and makes me think about the possibility of an early end to this bull run. I used to expect the ATH of this whole cycle in 2025 but I would be ready to take profits if BTC hits $150K-170K in 2024.