I say that the most important thing about a certain demo is to avoid errors in an account with real money, my brother-in-law has $15k in an exchange that has made money but only in a certain demo, says the one who is already Prepared to have traded with a real Account and he bought a funding account, the truth is not how profitable it is , I have to ask him how it is, but According to him, who has had good returns, I don't know very well how the deal works when you buy that type of things , but I believe that when things are done well it can give results to push oneself to be a good trader , for me everything has to be little by little.

One of the most important things in trading is to avoid mistakes related to technique and capital management + emotions. It is clear that demo accounts can help investors prepare better for this, even though they cannot be as good as real money accounts with real losses + profits. I am quite curious about the trading method that your brother is using to generate such good profits, it would be more interesting to see the balance growth when he uses demo accounts and real accounts. The difference between them can help us understand the difference between using demo accounts and real accounts.

I personally have felt positive things from the existence of this cryptocurrency industry, so I actually don't agree if, for example, our country prohibits activities in cryptocurrency.  Luckily our country doesn't ban it, so we can still trade and invest in crypto. 
Maybe in the past the countries that banned crypto saw that crypto was not useful or would be detrimental to their country so they banned it, but after seeing the huge development of crypto they changed their minds.

Years ago, for example during the bull run 2017, the focus was solely on blockchain technology: countries and companies wanted to use blockchain for supply chains or decentralized data storage for healthcare, transportation, education... Currently, blockchain technology is more developed, but its adoption by businesses is still not really widespread, only some private blockchains have been tested on a small scale. In the meantime, crypto has developed strongly and is seen as a new market, a new asset class for investors.

I'm not sure if governments see the value of crypto to the economy, but they have at least recognized that taxes from crypto can help the country develop better. Crypto adoption can also create jobs, attract investment, and get votes from young voters - these are enough to make politicians think seriously about a national crypto strategy.

Biden xứng đáng bị mất ghế tổng thống cho nhiệm kỳ tới, Trump xứng đáng hơn hẳn vì có nhiều quan điểm tích cực cho sự phát triển của crypto tại Mỹ. Nếu Mỹ còn chậm chân thì sẽ khó có thể trở thành trung tâm công nghệ và đổi mới tài chính như trước nay, crypto thực sự có thể là một cuộc cách mạng mà những quốc gia có chính sách phù hợp sẽ hưởng lợi và dẫn trước phần còn lại của thế giới. Việc Biden công khai chống lại sự phát triển của crypto có thể trở thành lý do lớn nhất để những người hâm mộ crypto đi bỏ phiếu cho Trump. Xét từ khía cạnh này, đây cũng là sự kiện tốt vì chúng ta dễ có sự thay đổi trong chính sách với crypto ở Mỹ và sau đó là toàn cầu.

Lần bầu cử này là trận chiến chính thức giữa những người ủng hộ crypto và những người chống đối crypto. Bên nào thắng lợi, dành được ghế tổng thống và đa số ở chính phủ sẽ có tác động đáng kể đến tương lai của crypto. Dường như có điều gì đó rất lớn đang diễn ra mà chúng ta chưa biết, mình hy vọng rằng đó là điều tích cực cho thị trường và chúng ta trong chu trình này và trong tương lai dài hạn.

Bản thân mình ủng hộ Trump tái đắc cử, vì Biden đang đứng về phía ngược lại với xu hướng crypto. Chính trị Hoa Kỳ có thể không quá quan trọng nhưng sự phát triển của crypto chắc chắc sẽ ảnh hưởng trực tiếp đến tài khoản của mình ^^

I never expected Notcoin to be able to do this. But I'm also not surprised because they do have large funds behind their project. Now what I regret is that I was not optimal in generating Notcoin from Telegram bots at that time. If I knew Notcoin would be like this then maybe I would have been more diligent. 

Yes, I also used to think of NOT as a normal memecoin on TON, because NOT is just the reverse order of T-O-N ^^

NOT has really surprised us by being able to access the most reputable CEXs in the crypto market. Along with the growth of TON price and the TON ecosystem, I believe NOT will continue to surprise us with its price performance right after listing and become a big story of this bullrun.

Be careful with new tokens created on the Solana network which have a very high risk, I do not give a guarantee that Zebec will remain good in the future, because so far many new tokens have ended up being scams because of the ease of creating new tokens on the Solana network.

I also think that every investor should be cautious with each new token in the market and need to carefully research the project information before investing. I just did that for Zebec Network.

Honestly, the project's website looks quite professional, has many updates and is featured on many crypto news sites. Team information is also presented transparently, meaning that at least this is not a cheap scam project. If Zebec can serve its partners with the power of the Solana network, I think Ripple will have another formidable competitor in the market ^^

I do not have any investment advice on the ZBCN token of this project, each investor should analyze and make own decision.

---

• Coinmarketcap: Zebec Network

It is true that a huge amount of electricity is lost every year and that it is about 50 000 TWh, and that for comparison BTC mining consumes somewhere around 200 TWh, which refutes any crazy claim that Bitcoin can have anything to do with a serious impact on the environment. Therefore, any use of what would otherwise be completely useless has a positive effect on the economy of a country and creates additional value.

Politicians are just exploiting the energy issue of the BTC network to polish their names and get more exposure in the media. At this point, I don't believe they still think that BTC has no value at all for the world, they are just trying to fool those who support their outdated views on BTC.

While energy is not enough for everyone, we still have a lot of wasted energy, I think it would be better if it could be tokenized into BTC for value storage and protection. My country, Vietnam, also has a lot of wasted solar energy, many power plants have to discharge electricity because the transmission system cannot meet the large capacity, I wish these power plants would operate their own BTC mining farms to utilize the surplus energy, create additional income for themselves and tax revenue for the country's development.

When investing, it's best to do it in lots of coins if you want to be successful in the crypto world. BTC is a favorite coin and safe to hold, but many altcoins make bigger profits than bitcoin. Everyone has their own analysis and strategy. Good luck

I believe the number of coins is not as important as their potential. Just one investment in SOL in 2020 has generated more profit than a portfolio of dozens of other tokens like EOS, NEO, TRX, LTC... At the same time, I believe that each investor should only have a few coins in their portfolio so that they can follow the project's development and make timely decisions.

BTC has recovered better than most ALTS in the market, so even though BTC price has x4 from the bottom, many ALTS investors are still losing money or have no significant profits. This is completely normal before the halving: money is still flowing into BTC. Everything may change after the halving and the market will enter altseason, I hope many ALTS will rise stronger than BTC and bring profits to investors.

I've worked in the Risk department of a CEX, and all transactions were analyzed by an AML/CTF algo. On the other hand, it's a set of factors more than the transaction itself that can lead to the transaction being frozen. Each user has a Risk Score based on the frequency of deposits/withdrawals, the amounts, the origin of deposits, their country of residence, and the SoF questionnaire they filled in on registration (income, expected volumes on the platform, etc.). Clearly, coins with a history with a casino or mixer aren't a problem if they're the user's only red flag, but if other flags are present, they'll use this as a pretext to justify asking for the origin of the funds.

Thank you for the very useful information. I had no idea how CEXs analyze and make decisions on user accounts. In the past, Binance has also frozen user BTC related to CoinJoin, so I am quite worried.

I hope that the silly proposal related to crypto Mixers will not be passed and users will have one less worry about Mixers.

---

• Binance Returns Frozen BTC After User ‘Promises’ Not to Use CoinJoin