Maybe if we have a lot of free funds we can buy bitcoin during a bearish season, because holding it will take so long and it uses money that is not needed in the near future. Right now there is still an opportunity to buy bitcoin when a deep correction occurs and holding it doesn't take long.

Yes, you are right. Well, as usual, everyone doesn’t have money at the moment when they need it, and no matter how paradoxical it may be, people buy Bitcoin when they have money and sell it when they need money and a very small number of people do it right and save and buying when they need to buy and selling when they achieve their goals.

Quote from: owlest on April 08, 2024, 09:16:07 AM

Quote from: Metha Wulandarin on April 07, 2024, 03:57:42 PM

I think so too because many do not meet the requirements, maybe because the party from HAVA COIN does not know that many users are from the lower class if it's like this for me it's not fair, although I don't have much hope for airdrops like this because it has been proven that airdrops like this do not give so many prizes that the estimated prizes are not much

Most users are not familiar with the Cosmos ecosystem, so they tend to focus on other assets and blockchains. Many prioritize retrodrops and other activities that do not require investments, so they are not interested in airdrops. In our community, many users have reported having 100 or more Atoms in several wallets, as well as other coins needed for airdrops.

Yes, therefore the investment I make in projects like this is only a little, as you said the risk is very high and even if we stake more than 100 Atom tokens it does not guarantee to qualify because most of them are taken from the leaderboard.

From my observation, you don't need a leaderboard when it comes to staking.
It's either you are qualified because you got the minimum requirement of token to be eligible, or not. No leaderboards whatsoever in staking, but it all depends on the amount of tokens you staked.

100 ATOMS is very high already. I have almost 60 ATOMS currently staked and based on my experience, I'm always eligible to every airdrop that includes "staked ATOM" as a requirement. I'm not saying that you need to buy 60, but the higher the coins, the higher the chances.

If you want to be eligible with airdrops on Cosmos Ecosystem, holding ATOM would be better than holding TIA. I'm currently looking on twitter for some legit airdrops for those who are holding ATOM, and I saw some. Soarchain, COOK (possible meme coin again), Elys Network are just some, and many more in the future I believe. Can I also ask you if how many ATOMS you are curerntly holding (that is if you want to disclose it here only).

Quote from: Wiseman on April 16, 2024, 07:33:52 AM

I think that support with ordinary fiat currencies such as the euro and dollar is enough.

Hi Wise
if stablecoins must protect from inflation, support with fiat currencies isn't enough.

Look how much purchasing power stablecoins supported by the USD has lost since 2000





In order to protect from inflation a Stablecoin must be supported by a hard currency

So you don’t take into account at that moment that even hard currency is valued everywhere using the fiat currency of the same dollar or euro; there is no difference in supporting a stable coin with gold or directly directly with dollars or euros

At parang sa napapansin ko kasi kaya rin nila ibinan kasi mawawalan ang mga bako sa pinas ng mga nag sesave sa banko yung may mga interest dahil mas malaki ang mga offer ni Binance sa annually kumpara sa mga offer ng mga banko. Malamang mismong mga banko ang nag plano o nag hikayat sa SEC na iban ang Binance.

May punto ka rito kabayan pero kung pag-iimpok ang pag-uusapan ay napaka-delikado kung gagawin nating impukan ng ating pera yong Binance kasi nga hindi sila regulated ng ating gobyerno, alam naman natin kahit na malaki pa tong Binance ay may chance rin na ma-hack ito at ito yong dahilan para magsara at mawala yong ini-impok nating pera sa kanila.

Quote from: Litzki1990 on April 06, 2024, 05:54:32 AM

In order to be the closest competitor to Ethereum, other coins must be close to Ethereum in popularity, while others must be worth the same amount as Ethereum. Among all the altcoins currently in the market, I don't see any coin that has the same popularity as Ethereum and that has a coin price close to the value of Ethereum. If the difference in popularity and price is not close then we can never call them worthy competitors of each other. However, there are some coins in the market that are quite promising and popular enough, even if they are not worthy competitors. While BNB may not come close to Ethereum, it goes without saying that its popularity will definitely rank third.

It will take time for other coins to have as much popularity as ethereum, because we look at BNB, Solana is still far from popular compared to ethereum. But as time goes by I am sure BNB and Solana will get closer to ethereum's position, and we will see exciting competition

At the moment there is no worthy competitor to Bitcoin in the market just like I think there is no worthy competitor to Ethereum. Bitcoin has a very important position in the market whereas Ethereum has a single important position in the market. Just as there is a difference in popularity and value between Ethereum and Bitcoin, there is a significant difference in popularity and value between Ethereum and other coins in the market. But if the popularity and price difference is not equal then we cannot consider that coin as a worthy competitor to another coin. If BNB ever approaches Ethereum in value and popularity, BNB will surely be a worthy competitor to Ethereum.