What do you think about coins issued without ICO?

[AltLogan]

I look at the opinions were divided, but in my opinion it is more rational to use coins issued with ICO.

Why you choose like that?
Can you explain your preference?

[Ahmedalab]

I think strong earning community and potential supporters doesn't like ICO because they knew it will succeed according to their scaling.

[Bhussainn2]

project that earn strong community and potential supporters doesn't like ICO because they knew it will succeed according to their scaling. That is their strategy that I think this kind of project are potential possession to hold for sure success will come.

[Gastonic]

Airdrop and not conducting any ico is a good idea. Projects who do airdrop instead of ICO are less risky to be under the jurisdiction of SEC. look at ontology. Last time they airdrop 1000 for every users. and its worth $10,000 during all time high.

[pelana vreo]

Bitcoin is a coin created without Ico. I think everyone knows the advantages. For new coins without other ico. I am still looking for some additional information. About wallet. Mining.masternode and other information.
New coins without Ico will have many investors. Because the new coins they make are only from Airdrop.

[pedangrusak]

if ICO is better and better quality it will support crypto price increases significantly but if what happens now, more projects and fake ICO will give less crypto burden where investors will refrain from plunging into crypto

[AnDoom]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Doesn't matter. The only question what problems these coins solve. For example, MobileGo project. Not sure but it seems to me they are going to create some kind of such a coin and let users utilize it on their ecosystem.

[laughingburger]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

The main difference i think is that if a coin is issue with ICO is that you not only is investing on the future of that coin and also its product. Whereas coins without ICO you are just purely investing on the future of the coin.

[Malam90]

Recently we have found few projects come from without ICO like-MFTU (Mainstream For The Underground), CYFM (Cyber FM), SeyBlock and few others. The projects are good but we need to investigate more about this because it is a new system without coin offering from ICO.

[AltLogan]

Some of them show amazing dedication to the project and gains very big community support.

Well, I was in the whitelist when Ontology decided to go forward with airdrop, and it really went well. I needlessly looked at the project and decided to support them to the end.

Which project you mean?
It would be great if you can share, because in my practice there was a lot of scam.

[AltLogan]

Some projects did not hold public ICO as their tokens/coins were sold out at an early stage. There are projects in which all tokens/coins were distributed between funds.

can you please share some of those projects?
it would be great if I can learn more.
thanks in advance

[diygirl]

if the coin does have a good prospect then I think it will benefit nothing without ico. usually a good ico will produce a good coin as well. then we have to be smart in choosing ico to get a profitable result.

[AltLogan]

Few altcoins that I've known without ICO still successful without ICO like Polymath, the greatest advantage of having an ICO is that you have a funds needed to fund or to run the project.

Polymath is still profitable?

[indexx]

The price of ICO coins are very cheap now it is because of the less interest of investors to buy and also the effects of bear market. I think the prices can rise immediately when bullrun happens. But for now, it is quite difficult to improve.

[AltLogan]

If you are talking about producing coins with a strong project without collecting money from people. That might be good. You know we saw polymath. I think they collected some money from capital firms but they didint do any crowdsale and they did airdrop to their subscribers. After that they entered binance community voting and they won. because too many people holding these airdrops and they gave their vote to polymath. That seems legit roadmap to entering binance . I also think coins without any investment good idea. Because you know these days companies try to collect firstly 20 30 million dollar amount which can cover their payments for next 50 year and they are starting to doing their project. But why they wanted money firstly ? they can create their platform and they can do airdrop all of their tokens and if after that platform start to earning money also holder can earn and they can do trade. It seems good for me. But icos want money mate. They will take our all of money and they will feel relax after that.

Thanks a lot for your explanation and opinion.
Now it's more clear for me.