What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants

[DaNNy001]

I used to think that the criterion for campaign managers is where you post, not your activity or the number of your posts. For example, since I joined the forum and the BTT forum, I have had a 0% posting rate in the gambling boards, and I know nothing about it. Therefore, if a campaign manager accepts me in a gambling signature, I think he must review the strategy for accepting new members.

Following the statistics using ---> https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=statistics;u=UID may help.

BTW, @yahoo62278 you really need to visit ----> Bounty Cheaters & Duplicate Accounts Accusations board.

It's not the number of posts, by how active are you I mean are you a regular contributor. Do you login once a day and make a post or once every 3 weeks and make a post or 2.

I'll make sure I check the duplicates section as well, thank you.

Well you have being on the business for long and your methods of selection of participants for your campaign is trusted, I mean no one would expect a campaign manager to actually select or add them to their campaign if he or she isn't really that active and besides you are promoting a service of which your activeness here is of vital importance and will play a big role in the spread of awareness of the signature you are promoting.

[Faisal2202]

Such a helpful post you have made, thanks for it, I will try to follow your suggestions. And your selection procedure for you must be very hard and time-consuming. I mean if you are checking that much information in a user's profile then that's a lot of work to do. I mean till now I did not realize how actually a manager looks at a member. As many managers have their own ways.

But your criteria are not that difficult and as of now, you have made this criteria public so I don't think anyone in this forum is violating that if they want to be a participant of your campaign. This post will not only improve the posts of bad posters but will also improve the posts of good ones. Best of luck, keep bringing new projects.

[WatChe]

What I am looking at in your profile

• How active are you?
• How much karma have you earned
• Are you a spammer?
• Are you burstposting
• Are you posting regularly, or do you just post in sig campaign threads, giveaways, and other various bounties?
• Are you posting multiple days per week?

This will help in answering many of our queries specially after not getting selected in Winz.io campaign. You are right that there must be some norms for earning dollars here. Those who are new here like me can make progress if we adhere to such norms, since most of admins have more or less same criteria while selecting participants.

[Ambatman]

What I am looking at in your profile

• How active are you?
• How much karma have you earned
• Are you a spammer?
• Are you burstposting
• Are you posting regularly, or do you just post in sig campaign threads, giveaways, and other various bounties?
• Are you posting multiple days per week?

This is unexpected in a good way
Surprised that a campaign manager would create time to make a thread that would guide individuals on its selection criteria.
It's well appreciated.
Well I guess I fail in the active part. Been inactive here and Bitcointalk for sometime now for personal reasons.
The thread is really helpful and an eye opener if I do say so myself. Hopefully the message you passing across gets adopted by users who fail to meet some of the requirements and this can help improve the quality of post in the platform.

[racham02]

For writing such a fascinating piece, Sir, we are incredibly appreciative.we are motivated and overflowing with hope after reading your article. It will be of tremendous assistance to people who hope to be accepted into signature campaigns and other project, I'm grateful for this once more

[Agbe]

Well said, this are your criteria for selecting participants in your campaign and any other manager who like to follow your footsteps can adopt it and if he doesn't want to follow and will like to adopt his method then that is for him because Karma is not a criteria to rank up but for quality posts therefore when you are selecting, you use the posting to select and that is base on karma which indicates quality. Nice peace of ball pen.

[JoyMarsha]

Yahoo62278, what you stated here is what every user who wants to partake in any signature campaign should be aware of before applying for signature campaigns.

It will be an idea for someone who hasn't made any post in this forum before to expect to be accepted in any of the signature campaigns all because they were teleported here to be on a higher rank than others who have stayed here for months or years. For you to point this out, it will be a reminder to them that, the input they put in other forums is also needed here. Let them not expect to be accepted in a campaign without making a post to questions and answers made here.


I believe, many of the forum members here, same as me were teleported from btt to here because of the mixers campaigns that were banned on btt. Had it been such didn't happen, many btt members wouldn't have found their way here, and here(altcointalk forum) wouldn't have this much traffic as it is now.

[Findingnemo]

Yahoo62278, I have been a part of your campaign for years (bustadice) and I never had any issues in terms of anything and the idea of selecting participants may shed light on the members here who want to make some bucks while being a valuable contributor to the community.

One point that you might missed out on mentioning but hate when people do is to switch campaigns too often when a couple more bucks extra offered in another campaign.

[yahoo62278]

Yahoo62278, I have been a part of your campaign for years (bustadice) and I never had any issues in terms of anything and the idea of selecting participants may shed light on the members here who want to make some bucks while being a valuable contributor to the community.

One point that you might missed out on mentioning but hate when people do is to switch campaigns too often when a couple more bucks extra offered in another campaign.

That might be relevant once this forum starts getting more campaigns and rates become competitive, but currently there are more members looking to join a campaign vs open spots. Noone is going to leave a campaign unless kicked out.

[Freemind]

Yahoo62278, I have been a part of your campaign for years (bustadice) and I never had any issues in terms of anything and the idea of selecting participants may shed light on the members here who want to make some bucks while being a valuable contributor to the community.

One point that you might missed out on mentioning but hate when people do is to switch campaigns too often when a couple more bucks extra offered in another campaign.

That's a very common thing but I've never understood why people do that. The differences in payouts between forum campaigns are really small, $2? Or $5 more?. Personally, I don't understand the reason, since because of that minimal difference I prefer to participate in the same campaign for longer instead of receiving $5 (for example) more, although I would understand it for much larger amounts. I suppose that the signature managers would appreciate it in the users, at least for me, it would be an important detail, but I have never seen them say anything about it. Maybe they are already used to it and don't give it importance.

[yahoo62278]

Yahoo62278, I have been a part of your campaign for years (bustadice) and I never had any issues in terms of anything and the idea of selecting participants may shed light on the members here who want to make some bucks while being a valuable contributor to the community.

One point that you might missed out on mentioning but hate when people do is to switch campaigns too often when a couple more bucks extra offered in another campaign.

That's a very common thing but I've never understood why people do that. The differences in payouts between forum campaigns are really small, $2? Or $5 more?. Personally, I don't understand the reason, since because of that minimal difference I prefer to participate in the same campaign for longer instead of receiving $5 (for example) more, although I would understand it for much larger amounts. I suppose that the signature managers would appreciate it in the users, at least for me, it would be an important detail, but I have never seen them say anything about it. Maybe they are already used to it and don't give it importance.

Well, as you know 5$ a week extra means more in different parts of the world. $5 in the usa might buy a gallon of milk, whereas $5 in Indonesia might buy half the groceries for the week. Not exact on the numbers here, but you guys know what I mean.

Now, I get why people might wanna switch campaigns but they don't take everything into consideration when doing so. How long is the new campaig or old campaign going to last? They switch campaigns for their extra $5 and now have possibly aggravated the manager who might not take them back now or in the future. They didn't ask how long either campaign will last and now are making that extra $5 for 1 week and that campaign ends. So they went from say $50 guaranteed for the next 3 months to $55 for 1 whole week. They just lost themselves $605.

It's better to just stay put unless you know the campaign you are currently in is ending IMO.

[Crypto Library]

That's a very common thing but I've never understood why people do that. The differences in payouts between forum campaigns are really small, $2? Or $5 more?. Personally, I don't understand the reason, since because of that minimal difference I prefer to participate in the same campaign for longer instead of receiving $5 (for example) more, although I would understand it for much larger amounts. I suppose that the signature managers would appreciate it in the users, at least for me, it would be an important detail, but I have never seen them say anything about it. Maybe they are already used to it and don't give it importance.

Here are some things that work for a Signature Campaign Participant's shifting from one campaign to another. Like some shift themselves one to another campaign cause not only the higher payrate also how lasting the campaign and also how is the project. Obviously, everyone wants to wear long-term and well-reputed projects as their signature. But I also don't like those who constantly transfer from one campaign to another campaign after seeing some higher payrate. But I also think that they have the freedom to shift from one campaign to another whenever they want. But I think taking leave during a running week is annoying for the campaign manager.

[bitterguy28]

So below I will list everything I look at when going through applications.

What I am looking at in your profile

• How active are you?
• How much karma have you earned
• Are you a spammer?
• Are you burstposting
• Are you posting regularly, or do you just post in sig campaign threads, giveaways, and other various bounties?
• Are you posting multiple days per week?

this is a complete and perfect basis in accepting participants yahoo ,  and would you also add those account that keeps Necrobumping  because there are some account I come across recently that loves posting on those old threads maybe to start spamming again not unless their post are valid and worth reading.

[Findingnemo]

Now, I get why people might wanna switch campaigns but they don't take everything into consideration when doing so. How long is the new campaig or old campaign going to last? They switch campaigns for their extra $5 and now have possibly aggravated the manager who might not take them back now or in the future. They didn't ask how long either campaign will last and now are making that extra $5 for 1 week and that campaign ends. So they went from say $50 guaranteed for the next 3 months to $55 for 1 whole week. They just lost themselves $605.

It's better to just stay put unless you know the campaign you are currently in is ending IMO.

Exactly, being in a campaign that runs for years is better than a campaign that offers 10 or 20 bucks extra but only lasts for a couple of weeks.

As you said if they consider everything they might lose because of the switch.

That makes me to be in a campaign that runs in the long run as well as I also look at other factors that I really like the product which I promote and it comes under my interests such that.

[DabsPoorVersion]

Now, I get why people might wanna switch campaigns but they don't take everything into consideration when doing so. How long is the new campaig or old campaign going to last? They switch campaigns for their extra $5 and now have possibly aggravated the manager who might not take them back now or in the future. They didn't ask how long either campaign will last and now are making that extra $5 for 1 week and that campaign ends. So they went from say $50 guaranteed for the next 3 months to $55 for 1 whole week. They just lost themselves $605.

It's better to just stay put unless you know the campaign you are currently in is ending IMO.

Exactly, being in a campaign that runs for years is better than a campaign that offers 10 or 20 bucks extra but only lasts for a couple of weeks.

As you said if they consider everything they might lose because of the switch.

That makes me to be in a campaign that runs in the long run as well as I also look at other factors that I really like the product which I promote and it comes under my interests such that.

The thing is no one exactly knows how long the campaign they plan to transfer would be running. Some really do prefer to find a higher-paying campaign due to their own reasons. Personally, I don't do this as I also want to be part of a long-term campaign.

But yes, that's also a hassle for campaign managers to find a replacement participant for the campaign as they need to filter all the applying participants and find the best fit for the position.