Report Spammers

[bitmover]

Edit: I will try to talk to the affected user.

The idea is to warn the user and draw the attention of the manager. As I said, it is not my intention to exclude someone from the possibility of earning some money.

I think it is important that spam is not rewarded through signature rewards, that would be a waste of money for both the campaign owner and the forum.

Thanks Freemind for your engagement here.

I agree with this.

I think the community is too aggressive is bitcointalk. People are very intolerant and harsh and a person can be easily red tagged... I don't agree with many red tags I have seen there

[Freemind]

The idea is to warn the user and draw the attention of the manager. As I said, it is not my intention to exclude someone from the possibility of earning some money.

I think it is important that spam is not rewarded through signature rewards, that would be a waste of money for both the campaign owner and the forum.

Thanks Freemind for your engagement here.

Don't worry, I know that your intention is not to go against the user, and it is not my intention either, that is why I have sent a PM to the user so that he can read these posts and be aware of what is happening.

I agree with this.

I think the community is too aggressive is bitcointalk. People are very intolerant and harsh and a person can be easily red tagged... I don't agree with many red tags I have seen there

I know, unfortunately I know how aggressive the BTT community is sometimes. That's why we do things differently here.

Thanks to both of you, @examplens and @bitmover, for your interest in improving the forum.

+2 for each of you.

[examplens]

I agree with this.

I think the community is too aggressive is bitcointalk. People are very intolerant and harsh and a person can be easily red tagged... I don't agree with many red tags I have seen there

I know, unfortunately I know how aggressive the BTT community is sometimes. That's why we do things differently here.

Thanks to both of you, @examplens and @bitmover, for your interest in improving the forum.

+2 for each of you.

Yes, Bitcointalk users can be very aggressive with very little tolerance.
We have had a large number of campaigns there for years, and there is a lot of competition when applying, following the rules of the campaign has become very important because it is very easy to lose a place. This is what is missing from this forum, I hope that some new campaigns will bring such an upgrade.

There is an obvious pattern of behaviour, and I have the impression that the natives of this forum and the campaign signatures experience it as some kind of bounty whose results nobody cares about.
So for example (see the post time)


It is very easy to recognize this kind of behaviour.
What do these three users have in common? Burstposting, participants (of the same) campaign, zoom 1 membership, non-teleported.

The manager should pay attention to such things, and possibly give some warnings to such users with an explanation of what they are doing wrong. Without raising the quality, there will be no new campaigns or forum growth.

I will put a link to this discussion in the campaign thread to draw the manager's attention to this.

[hugeblack]

It is very easy to recognize this kind of behaviour.
What do these three users have in common? Burstposting, participants (of the same) campaign, zoom 1 membership, non-teleported.

+1 , Since this falls under "this user contributes mostly to none crypto topics or very superficial contribution." It is within quality3^[1]



But even Zoom 1 membership is no longer a meaningful classification because no penalties have been taken.


@Freemind I hope to send a message to all Zoom 1 members { if they do not change their posting style within 10 days, their signatures will be deleted (they can wear signatures after 3 months if their posting style changes), thus we have guaranteed healthy discussions.}

[1] https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319457.0

[Freemind]

I will put a link to this discussion in the campaign thread to draw the manager's attention to this.

In addition to the aggressiveness of some BTT users and the ease with which a user can lose a spot in a signature campaign, unfortunately it is also easy to get banned.

The users shown in the screenshot you posted were added to my list as of this morning, with the intention of sending them a private message. By the way, @legend45 replied to me and told me that he had read the message I sent him. I hope it helps in some way. I will help as much as possible in the campaign thread with the post you write. A link to this conversation would also be interesting, so that users can value what they have and use it correctly.

Once again @examplens, thank you for your dedication and interest in improving the forum.

+1 , Since this falls under "this user contributes mostly to none crypto topics or very superficial contribution." It is within quality3^[1]



But even Zoom 1 membership is no longer a meaningful classification because no penalties have been taken.


@Freemind I hope to send a message to all Zoom 1 members { if they do not change their posting style within 10 days, their signatures will be deleted (they can wear signatures after 3 months if their posting style changes), thus we have guaranteed healthy discussions.}

[1] https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319457.0

Zoom group is still useful for classifying, but it is true that the administrator should possibly allow more moderators to work with that group, since he has other tasks to do.

I agree with you that sending a message to everyone in the zoom group is a good idea, but I think it's the campaign manager who can (and should) push harder on that.

[hugeblack]

I agree with you that sending a message to everyone in the zoom group is a good idea, but I think it's the campaign manager who can (and should) push harder on that.

In the beginning, there was talk about some restrictions, but I hope that they will not be implemented soon, or at least that users will be warned before implementing them.

the quality bar will have some features and limitations
more on this soon


for example red dots > will no longer be able to have signatures

[Freemind]

In the beginning, there was talk about some restrictions, but I hope that they will not be implemented soon, or at least that users will be warned before implementing them.

the quality bar will have some features and limitations
more on this soon


for example red dots > will no longer be able to have signatures

Correct. I guess the admin still needs to make some changes from what we read in that post. And also the managers (in case there are any who don't know) will have to do something to fill the free spots when these new rules start to work. Although in theory these users should not have been accepted in the signature campaigns, although not all managers may think the same. What would be a complete disaster is for some managers to accept users who are within the zoom group and other managers to do the opposite. A consensus is needed to clarify things.