follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Author Topic: Ethereum Classic Claims Successful Blockchain Fork  (Read 972 times)

Offline 9158 Exchange

  • Baby Steps
  • *
  • Activity: 34
  • points:
    605
  • Karma: 0
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 0
  • Last Active: June 01, 2018, 08:08:18 AM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter 10 Posts First Post
Ethereum Classic Claims Successful Blockchain Fork
« on: May 30, 2018, 07:28:35 AM »
Ethereum classic has removed its so-called "difficulty bomb."
Designed to increase the difficulty of mining its blockchain over time, the code was a feature of the original ethereum codebase (which later split into ethereum classic and ethereum) in 2016. The successful network upgrade took place at block 5,900,000, according to available network data and statements from developers involved in the project.
While it is difficult to account for exact percentages in terms of how many nodes updated their software (owing to a lack of available tools), developers involved with the project told CoinDesk that most exchange nodes and mining pools reported updating their software well before the fork.
There was no indication of any ill effects or bugs in the hours immediately after the fork. The upgrade is expected to reduce the amount of time it takes to create a block.
As such, the upgrade puts both technical and ideological distance between the ethereum classic and ethereum blockchains.
While the ethereum community remains committed to transitioning to a proof-of-stake consensus system, the ethereum classic community has elected to continue using proof-of-work, as its members contend that, of the various ways to achieve consensus over block validation, it resists centralization best.
More specifically, advocates argue that proof-of-work systems require their validators (miners) to continuously invest in hardware and therefore in the blockchain.
Deliberation on the fork started as early as 2016, and due to the extensive discussions, the upgrade was not expected to be controversial or complicated.

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum

Ethereum Classic Claims Successful Blockchain Fork
« on: May 30, 2018, 07:28:35 AM »

This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open


aiviaa485

  • Guest
Re: Ethereum Classic Claims Successful Blockchain Fork
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2018, 05:21:12 PM »
maybe it's better when you write articles that are full of meaning must include reference link.
so that everyone can see the evidence you wrote in this thread.

 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod