follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - alltalk

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 230
31
Arteta, who was Pep's assistant in the past, is now able to stand on an equal footing with Pep. Yes, and last season Pep couldn't admit Arteta but now Pep admits Arteta can make Arsenal stronger from season to season. And yes, this season Arsenal have succeeded in making Man City lose points. And because of that, Pep will now no longer underestimate Arsenal. So it's natural to think of this match as a final.
How do you know Guardiola didn't admit Arteta as a professional manager in the same level with him in the last season?
I don't see any statement from Guardiola related to this matter. I'm sure Guardiola have admitted the level of Arteta, he is one of the top managers in EPL now. Sure, Arteta have built Arsenal be a strong team again. It is even to be stronger that Arsenal team in Arsène Wenger era.

32
I support you on Atletico Madrid having a chance to finish in top 4 but then they need to be consistent and be more clinical in goals, Barcelona was facing same issues especially during December last year and alot critise Lewandowski but it's good to see his getting his rhythm back. Barca can actually finish second if they continue like especially since Girona has not been having good games in recent Matches
The point gap between Atletico Madrid and Athletic Club is only 1 point. I think it won't be difficult for Atletico Madrid to overtake Athletic Club. Athletic Club may lose points in the upcoming match because they will play against Real Madrid away. Meanwhile Atletico Madrid will play with easier team, against Villareal. I think this is a good chance to return to the top 4 (UCL Zone).

Yes, Barcelona and Girona also played inconsistently now. They also wasted points in some matches.


33
There is nothing wrong with a 1-0 final result, and there is nothing wrong with expecting to see a different result to the previous 4 finals.
Why was I advised to watch the NBA because of that comment lol, everyone has their own way of enjoying a match.
A result of 1-0 = does not mean the match will definitely be boring or tense, and a high-scoring game doesn't necessarily mean there are a lot of mistakes with the defense.
Yep. It is not a big deal if the match ends with 1-0.
In the final match, both teams will play very carefully to minimize the chance of mistakes. So, the number of goals probably will be lower than the common matches. And both teams in the final must have almost the same strength, so the game of each teams will be equal. That's why we rarely saw the final match with big scores.

You can say it is a boring match, other can say it is a tight match. It is just a personal perception, dude!


34
Gambling discussion / Re: Is Gambling for All?
« on: March 20, 2024, 11:58:02 PM »
I was reading some of the gambling threads this evening and this topic just came to me. I was seen like come and gamble and make money or gamble to make extra funds so I was like, if gambling is for making extra income then everyone would like to play gamble and make that extra money but there are some inexperienced gamblers in the society, and gambling is limited to some ages. So what about those who are inexperienced on gambling?
First of all, gambling is just for people who are already mature enough. In some country, it is above 18 years old. But in few countries, it is above 20/21 years old.

I don't think gambling is a proper place if you want to expect for additional income regularly. There are only few people who can get money from gambling, most of them just waste their money. Unless you gamble for fun, I think you need to evaluate your purpose if it is for earning regular income (side jobs).


35
Seputar Forum / Re: -Karma itu sekarang Mulai Diperhitungkan-
« on: March 20, 2024, 11:55:14 PM »
Justru bagus sistem kirim karma dihidden jadi tidak ada sesama user yang tau tentang transaksi pengiriman karma dan murni hanya diketahui oleh admin. Takutnya kita dianggap multi akun apalagi karma yang kita bagikan untuk sesama user lokal dan tau sendiri bagaimana sensitifnya forum saat ini.
Awalnya saya sepemikiran dengan Om Armanda. Namun menurut saya, sistem ini lebih baik dirubah. Dari kasus yang terjadi belakangan, saya berpikiran akan lebih baik jika karma mulai dibuat seperti merit saja. Biar kita tau mana post yang diberikan karma, apa tolak ukur post itu layak diberikan karma. Selain itu, kita juga bakal tau circle atau siklus perputaran karma antar anggota forum dengan jelas. Tidak ada lagi saling tuduh atau curiga dengan karma negatif. Tapi kalau tidak mau pusing tentang karma ini, saya malah berpikir mending tidak perlu ada sistem karma.


36
Sepertinya ada kemungkinan sih, hari ini aja harga bitcoin drop sangat drastis sekali dari ATH kemaren $73k turun di harga $63k dan sampai sekarang masih saja trend penurunan harga. Prediksi dan ekpektasi saat pasar bullrun mungkin menjadi daya tarik sendiri namun dari beberapa edisi halving bisa koreksi terjadi setelah halving bukan sebelum halving. Mungkin halving kali ini polanya sedikit berbeda semoga saja ini hanya koreksi sebelum bitcoin bisa membuat ATH terbaru sama sebelumnya saat ATH di 69$ dan bitcoin turun sampai di $59k sebelum membuat ATH menyentuh di harga $73k.
Ya, walaupun sebenarnya harga masih bertahan di atas $60k. Menurut saya, penurunan harga sejauh ini masih bisa dikatakan normal mengingat sebelumnya reli kenaikannya cukup cepat. Asal harga tidak turun sampe ke $50k, saya masih optimis harga bisa lewat $100k. Memang benar trend market pra halving mungkin berbeda dari sebelumnya. Namun ini juga bisa dimaklumi berkat berita market ETF yang tidak ada di perode halving sebelumnya.

Ga tau pastinya gan, kan cuma bandar yang tau ;D
Yang jelas %-naiknya ga sebesar bull run periode sebelumnya, ya dari karena (1) teori dan (2) trend grafik sudah menunjukkan indikasi seperti itu.
Bandar ya?  ;D
Itu kalau dilihat dari grafik ya. Cuman kalo dari segi good news yang mendukung kenaikan harga, saya kira periode ini jauh lebih baik asalkan tidak ada bad news terkait market ETF.


37
First of all, I'd like to thank The Hunter (the plaintiff) for his efforts in helping the forum in fighting cheating in campaigns and multi-accounts. I need to emphasize that we as judges always use facts and legal rules in making decisions. We are of course always on the neutral side in deciding every case.

Based on what the plaintiff conveyed, we have carried out further investigation and analysis regarding this case.
With the facts provided, we can take several important points and steps as follows:

Case 1

1. The evidence provided is direct evidence or key evidence, namely POA. It is admissible evidence.
2. The evidence "POA" is admissible and strong evidence to prove that two accounts are owned by one person.

The conclusion of this case is that Rifan Khan is proven guilty.


Cases 2 - 5

I handed over cases 2 - 5 to @Hair, who used to be the judge who handled them because they were still connected to the case submitted by Abang Jago.

Thank You

"If the prosecution cannot prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury or judge must acquit them"

https://thedefenders.net/blogs/acquittals/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt



38
First of all, I'd like to thank The Hunter (the plaintiff) for his efforts in helping the forum in fighting fraud in campaigns and multi-accounts. I need to emphasize that we as judges always use facts and legal rules in making decisions. We are of course always on the neutral side in deciding every case.

Based on what the plaintiff conveyed, we have carried out further investigation and analysis regarding this case.
With the facts provided, we can draw several important points regarding this case:

1. There is only 1 type of evidence, namely proof of transactions between wallets.
2. There is no supporting evidence that the sending wallet and the recipient's wallet are owned by one person.

As judges, we need strong and convincing admissible evidence to declare someone guilty. The evidence presented by the plaintiff is not strong enough because it is only suspected to be owned by one person. Further admissible evidence is needed to reach the conclusion that there is a strong connection. The plaintiff does not have key admissible evidence that elaborates on the proof of the transaction.

We close this case with the following conclusions:
Declare that the accused has not been proven guilty of what was alleged by the plaintiff.

Thank You

"If the prosecution cannot prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury or judge must acquit them"

https://thedefenders.net/blogs/acquittals/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt



39
First of all, I'd like to thank The Hunter (the plaintiff) for his efforts in helping the forum in fighting cheating in campaigns and multi-accounts. I need to emphasize that we as judges always use facts and legal rules in making decisions. We are of course always on the neutral side in deciding every case.

Based on what the plaintiff conveyed, we have carried out further investigation and analysis regarding this case.
With the facts provided, we can draw several important points regarding this case:

1. There is only 1 type of evidence, namely proof of transactions between wallets.
2. There is no supporting evidence that the sending wallet and receiving wallet are owned or managed by Damsix itself.
3. Damsix admitted that these accounts were accounts owned by his family.
4. Previously there were no special rules regarding joining a family forum. However, currently, there is a rule that states that other family members can only use 1 of the 2 extra accounts that we have.
The 2 extra accounts must declare duplicate accounts on the forum.
5. Because the accounts are used by different people, it is not considered a cheating campaign.
6. Regarding karma abuse, we leave it to the admin, because only the admin can access and know the karma log.

By paying attention to the existing points, the accused's accounts have relation because they are still in the same family of Damsix. This is reinforced by Damsix's own admission. However, this account is not considered a multi-account because it is not used by one person. However, because the forum has just made new rules regarding the use of accounts within the same family, Damsix is obliged to follow the new rules made by the forum. In accordance with the new rules, Damsix and his family can only use 3 accounts. 1 main account Damsix account, 2 duplicate Damsix accounts. Damsix is required to declare the 2 duplicate accounts in the related thread. One of the 2 duplicate accounts can be used by his family.

There is no key admissible evidence related to cheating, there is only evidence of transfers between wallets which are not accompanied by supporting evidence regarding the wallets being managed by one person. The key evidence in question is direct evidence which shows that the wallets are indeed owned by the same person. There needs to be further evidence such as POA, data, or other things that support proof of the transfer.

We close this case with the following conclusions:
Stating that Damsix is obliged to follow the new rules regarding the use of accounts within the same family which were agreed upon at the Senate hearing. Meanwhile, the accusation of cheating was not proven because the evidence was still weak.

Notes:
- Judges make decisions based on existing facts. Judges do not make decisions based on assumptions or abstract things that have no definite basis or benchmarks.
- The judge does not give punishment for something that has no legal basis in the forum.

"If the prosecution cannot prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury or judge must acquit them"

https://thedefenders.net/blogs/acquittals/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt



40
First of all, I'd like to thank The Hunter (the plaintiff) for his efforts in helping the forum in fighting cheating in campaigns and multi-accounts. I need to emphasize that we as judges always use facts and legal rules in making decisions. We are of course always on the neutral side in deciding every case.

Based on what the plaintiff conveyed, we have carried out further investigation and analysis regarding this case.
With the facts provided, we can draw several important points regarding this case:

1. There is only 1 type of evidence, namely proof of transactions between wallets.
2. There is no supporting evidence that the sending wallet and the recipient's wallet are owned by one person.
3. The defense given by Anshor1 is reasonable because it is supported by logical reasons.
4. The assumption of similarity in writing style or other things must be proven in detail. It cannot be measured just based on conclusions from the use of one or two words whose use is not massive. Meanwhile, for similarities in the time of account activity on the forum, further evidence is needed (in the form of photos, screenshot, data, etc.).
5. Communities are not prohibited on the altcoinstalks forum.

From the points above, the evidence provided is still weak because it lacks supporting admissible evidence. The judge cannot find the suspect guilty on weak evidence. Even though there are assumptions conveyed, they cannot be strong admissible evidence without the support of theory, data, photos, and other admissible evidence. Debate and differences of opinion in this prosecution are normal, but judges only draw conclusions based on the available admissible evidence. Admissible evidence that has clear benchmarks and is not abstract and subjective.

We close this case with the following conclusions:
Declare that the accused is not been proven guilty of what was alleged by the plaintiff.

Thank You



"If the prosecution cannot prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury or judge must acquit them"

https://thedefenders.net/blogs/acquittals/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt



41
First of all, I'd like to thank The Hunter (the plaintiff) for his efforts in helping the forum in fighting cheating in campaigns and multi-accounts. I need to emphasize that we as judges always use facts and legal rules in making decisions. We are of course always on the neutral side in deciding every case.

Based on what the plaintiff conveyed, we have carried out further investigation and analysis regarding this case.
With the facts provided, we can draw several important points regarding this case:

1. There is only 1 type of evidence, namely proof of transactions between wallets.
2. There is no supporting evidence that the sending wallet and the receiving wallet are owned by 1 person (Vx1).
3. Vx1 (the accused) provides evidence that can explain that the transaction was a transaction to another person.

As judges, we need strong and convincing admissible evidence to declare someone guilty. The evidence presented by the plaintiff is not strong enough because it is only suspected to be owned by one person. Further evidence is needed to reach the conclusion that there is a strong connection. The plaintiff does not have key evidence that elaborates on the proof of the transaction. On the other hand, the accused has also given a convincing answer that he is innocent.

We close this case with the following conclusions:
Declare that the accused is not been proven guilty of what was alleged by the plaintiff.

Thank You



"If the prosecution cannot prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury or judge must acquit them"

https://thedefenders.net/blogs/acquittals/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt



42
Manchester United make the history after victory against Liverpool and qualify to semifinal of FA Cup, indeed had poor performance in domestic league but Manchester United make us surprised after defeating Liverpool over 4-3.
Very interested match between Manchester United vs Liverpool although as FA Cup but both team play more aggressive and score 7 goals in this match.
Now, Manchester United waiting the opponent team in semifinal round and FA Cup become the great opportunity for winning trophy in this season after failure in Champion League and Premier League.
It is not the first time Man United goes to semi-final of FA Cup. They also already many times to beat Liverpool. I think there is nothing special with this. Honestly, I'm not really surprised if Man United can beat Liverpool. Man United is actually not a weak team, they just played inconsistently. In the quarter final of FA Cup, Man United can optimize their performance. Well, it seems they will be in the final round because the opponent in the semi-final is a weak team. They probably will face Man City in the final.


43
I'm not sure what will happen in this season. Sometimes, they are beyond our expectations.
But, I don't think Real Madrid will make it this season. If we consider several reasons, Man City should be much further ready, stronger lineups, and also squad entirely. They have Haaland, de Bruyne, and you can see more on lineup, they are much more tough.
If we analyze the squad quality, I agree that Man City seems more ready to win the UCL trophy this season. Man City looks having good players in every line, they are still the strongest squad in UCL. Man City also has no problem with injured players now, the injured players have recovered. Meanwhile Real Madrid still has some key players who are injured for a long time. I doubt they will miss the chance to play in important match against Man City.

When Man City has Haaland and De Bruyne in their lineup, it is not difficult to beat another team. It is great that both these players have recovered quickly from the injury.


44
ATH double atau tidak, saya kira tidak ada yang tau pasti. Meskipun secara analisa teknis itu mungkin, tapi bisa saja tidak terjadi.
Yang jelas kalau berdasarkan history, ATH tertinggi BTC selalu ada di tahun berikutnya setelah halving.

Jadwal halving: 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024
ATH Bitcoin: 2013, 2017, 2021, ....... (2025)

Kalau dilihat dari historynya, kemungkinan ATH akan di tahun 2025.



https://pintu.co.id/academy/post/apa-itu-bitcoin-halving

Mungkin nanti ATH bisa di $80k-an?
Berarti harga BTC gak bakal nyampe ke 100k, Om?
Padahal banyak prediksi bilang harga BTC akan bisa sampe $150k.


45
Solana Forum / Re: Can Solana reach $100?
« on: March 16, 2024, 11:59:20 PM »
Solana has peaked this year in 2024 and has been heavily pumped which has pushed it past $100. Since Solana is currently pumping a lot, we can expect the coin to go higher and touch $200. So you can invest this coin if you want and it looks good for investment the future of this coin will be better.
Solana has increased significantly during this year but it still can't reach the ATH. However, it surely has crossed $100. The current price of Solana is already above $180, it may reach $200 in the next few weeks. It is not a bad idea to invest in this coin but make sure to check the update of the current information of this coin. Even if I believe Solana can reach its ATH again ($260) but we don't know about the trend of Solana in the next few months.

I'll lock this thread because the topic is no longer appropriate for the current price.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 230
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod