What do you think about coins issued without ICO?

[Warung_lontong]

for now there are very many coins issued without the ico program and that is what is called airdrop, and I think airdrop is more popular now than ico.

[de_prof]

Investing in ICO is much more risky than investing in Bitcoin for example.
ICO is a project that can fail for different reasons: weak market, few customers, etc.

If you want to invest in ICO coins you have to check its story and volatility of the coin. You have to do a big research.
So for a novice in crypto it's better to choose something more valuable.

I agree mate. Investing in ICO is more risky than invest in coin. too many ICOs are scam. I prefer invest in bitcoin and ethereum. They are trusted coin.

[Alpha]

I think that project have been in great formation of team, investors, supporters, and product to produce in the market. That could be mean ready to launch.

[Pupus]

there are lots of coins produced from good ico. personally, I would prefer the coins that produced by ico because we can know how the prospects are in the future. but it all depends on the project being followed.

[sampoerna]

Most likely the coin is new or maybe the coin is a scam. It could be like that. I am sure there are many coins that provide ICO too. So they are more reliable and better than coins that are not in the ICO. Because later the ICO project will help raise the price in addition to the buyers by the traders.

[Legends]

basically, it all depends on the prospect of the coin itself. if the coin has a good prospect then I think it will be a good coin. but if we follow legit ico then we also get coins that are legit too.

[Dprincebh]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

The coins suffer devaluation at first when the coin or token is been launched into the market but aftetward the price stabilize

[AltLogan]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Of course, it's different. Coins without an ICO usually function to serve in the exchange of goods or services. So the price of each coin reflects the form of cash and liquidity. While ICO coins are generally more focused on a project. Their token is created to meet certain types of market instruments or is a single business. even making it on existing blockchain supports smart contracts like Ethereum and Waves.

So that means ICO projects are willing to bring more profit to those who started the project?

[AltLogan]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Are you trying to compare the 100% Airdropped tokens and ICO funded projects?

If that is what you meant, then here is what I think:
They appear to have a similar pattern (many will pop up and many will soon die or fail) but the mortality rate of ICOs are a bit lower compared to airdrops. Although I can say that I have seen some notable 100% airdropped projects I joined that are performing better than ICOs but atleast 90% of them are gone now.

Ok, so then ICO is more reliable and long term period lasting?

[cryptofunn]

Many projects collect funds at the private collection stage. and in general they do not need to spend ICO. As a rule, these are very high-quality projects that are legally responsible to investors. Some projects do not sell tokens, and distribute according to the scheme of airdrop

[Abusadeeq6]

I think doing ICO is the best option for now. Because u got to attract a large community in order to keep the project going

[AltLogan]

Ico is not necessary to be succesful for a project there are. Some good cases of project without ico like rebellious that have done only airdrop. Community support is very important ..

Ok, that means you mostly believe in ICO potential according to community support importance?

[Marryan]

Investing in ICO is much more risky than investing in Bitcoin for example.
ICO is a project that can fail for different reasons: weak market, few customers, etc.

If you want to invest in ICO coins you have to check its story and volatility of the coin. You have to do a big research.
So for a novice in crypto it's better to choose something more valuable.

I agree mate. Investing in ICO is more risky than invest in coin. too many ICOs are scam. I prefer invest in bitcoin and ethereum. They are trusted coin.

That's exactly what I do. Maybe some ICOs will become really valuable and I will regret, but still it's hard to predict

[Nazir]

If a few coins did not issued or have an ICO it means they have got sufficient budget for the project but for those mission that has an ICO they want a big sum of money to launch their undertaking it's why they doing it.

[Helex]

usually coins or tokens do ICO to promote their products. however there are also folk that do no longer undergo the ICO procedure a usual. CYFM and MFTU are tokens dispensed now not through the ICO mechanism and are indexed in lot of exchanges. This proves that this device without ICO may be achieved because also.