It's something like a rating to a topic where maybe an admin, president or v-president can only give such ratings in an specific board.

Consider this scenario: imagine an update is pushed to a software wallet with a malicious code. If hackers gain access to the update process or the wallet developer's infrastructure, they could inject malicious code into a seemingly legitimate update. Users who download and install this update could unknowingly expose their wallet's private keys or seed phrases to the attackers which would lead to loss of their funds.

This raises the question: can this happen with any software wallet? Does it mean we can't trust anyone?

This happened to electrum wallet last year or few months ago. That's the reason i don't update eventually my electrum and other wallet, unless a vulnerable was detected and was announced through their official social media handles, websites and some other news outlets. Other than that, i still do that practice more often.

It's also good to note that atomic wallet is not open source, yet they call themselves as non-custodial wallet and there's no way to tell that it really is. In this case you will need to trust the software that it won't save your private keys on their server. But were here in crypto open source software are the foundation of the tech so better to use it instead of the closed ones. And equip yourself with knowledge on how to do good practice to make transaction, how to secure your device and how to keep yourself safe from any attackers online.

Apologize for the inconvenience i was working with something and i uploaded the file that is not ready yet. This issue must be fixed now, last time i saw multiple mention was 05/09 and started on 05/04 based on my logs.

Feel free to send an issue/problem here to those who encounter such notification beyond 05/09

Username: PX-Z
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qj3n7ycvf07u2k45uuq6277eezzwtmk7vgsh926

Maybe you have run out of server resources.
One hour interval is long time period but if this is only for karma notification that is acceptable.
It is more important to have faster notifications when someone mentions or tag me in post.

Resources is not a problem, i guess it's more like the hosting service itself and also the CPU usage. This change will be temporary only as i see it's effective than before which is 10 mins interval, i may change it little by little in the the new few days for testing.

Here is what i usually quote from different source to here or bitcointalk so can use either for both

Sorry about those few minutes of errors. I was trying to update something which I thought wouldn't cause any issues, but it did cause major issues, which I wasn't entirely prepared for.

[quote="[url=https://Any_URL_Here.com]Downtime[/url]"]
Quoted text
[/quote]
It will look like a normal quote from here but only will show after you click or hover the anchor text.

25 posts in day is overwhelming how much more for 50, well, unless you are a mods who is regularly moving threads since its counted as new post as i presumed the same on bitcointalk.

As for its purpose, admin is correct for mods identify users behaviour especially in lower rank or new accounts.