Linked Wallets Detected 2

[The Hunter]

https://etherscan.io/address/0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904
Main Account : 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904(ETH)


Linked Evidence Wallet

Transaction Hash https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1694c1c3175a9451e9796b052e3bbbc8d6d0d02352fed02a7c41c0d6db03ec17
0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 sent 0.01 ETH
($34.19) to 0x92ee922d058D09278e3d60A81F110Cb721159620

who is 0x92ee922d058D09278e3d60A81F110Cb721159620 ?

1.therozaq
Date Registered : June 30, 2018, 06:13:11 PM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=summary;u=34062
POA : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=190000.msg1083514#msg1083514
Joined Tumbler Signature (Spreadsheet no. 8 )

Transaction Hash https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9f0b4dae4ad5603b3f0aec17932368d65dfbe8f8b6b4d84796aa6c0b10757d46
0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 sent 0.01 ETH
($34.19) to 0x63Ad7F6291De4C39093e2766391669D2ecCaCbFE

who is 0x63Ad7F6291De4C39093e2766391669D2ecCaCbFE?

2.Doctor
Date Registered : July 01, 2018, 06:46:00 AM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=summary;u=34070
POA : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=200193.msg1129653#msg1129653
Joined SWGT Signature (Spreadsheet no.2 )



Transaction Hash https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9c8ba396924748f5c0374d5c4684cddb5a252682383d49034cb4c22e426754e1
0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 sent 0.043 ETH
($147.05) to 0x4EE1b083580b1C6792bDD61b3fdC774405b05C9A

who is 0x4EE1b083580b1C6792bDD61b3fdC774405b05C9A

3.DAMKAR
Date Registered : July 06, 2018, 06:00:10 PM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=summary;u=34310
POA : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=190000.msg1072525#msg1072525
Joined Coinomize Signature (Spreadsheet no. 31)
 

https://etherscan.io/address/0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c


Main Account 2 : 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c(ETH/BSC)


Transaction Hash: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x80931a96761176418b2906a1531ad4d644377596b04e3a400ff298848bbfd1cb
0xADb23A39032CE81b98eaa827c3AC4E1d76629956 sent 0.00647 ETH
(22.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c

who is 0xADb23A39032CE81b98eaa827c3AC4E1d76629956?

Doctor
POA : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=269396.msg1367662#msg1367662


Transaction Hash https://etherscan.io/tx/0xecd6b23dcfabf96b1ba8b9c7629d750d8026dc7b174fedcbc5c93d806b75e769
0x44e2a1e469e5eCC2fFf9D9c12b31F564AaDc36F6 sent 0.0034 ETH
(22.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c

who is 0x44e2a1e469e5eCC2fFf9D9c12b31F564AaDc36F6?

1.elbans89
Date Registered : July 06, 2018, 05:16:41 PM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=summary;u=34307
POA  : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=188163.msg1058604#msg1058604
Joined Tumbler Signature (Spreadsheet no.16 )

Transaction Hash https://etherscan.io/tx/0xbc435c412300a1cec71811462c132dfc15bcce3ef80782dccb97a839785c94b3
0x4EE1b083580b1C6792bDD61b3fdC774405b05C9A (DAMKAR) sent 0.00473 ETH
($16.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c

Transaction Hash : https://bscscan.com/tx/0x3e48d59709a84387be7ba9a7e5ea1b9d14eb10d56733c177e1fafe63aeb1e325 (BSC)
0xADb23A39032CE81b98eaa827c3AC4E1d76629956 (Doctor) sent 0.003 BNB
0x0F81ea4d79CfD0024f2092e57b057D7e6062651f


who is 0x0F81ea4d79CfD0024f2092e57b057D7e6062651f?

2.Pacar Tiri
Date Registered : July 08, 2018, 11:50:05 AM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=summary;u=34348
POA  : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=279421.msg1397233#msg1397233
Joined Coinomize  Signature (Spreadsheet no. 45)




Look this https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9f0b4dae4ad5603b3f0aec17932368d65dfbe8f8b6b4d84796aa6c0b10757d46
0x97a4548787985c60A992785b85818DF7C4456904 (Main account) sent 0.01 ETH 0x6fBAA88DFD8B16f31eB5e6f25924Fb5DeE39f89F (Main account 3)
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xac277256e1af1a4c14319906890c930e98cf0ef2c4ab04a59d91cc7fd11017cc
0xBce30A5a4160479A6909EDD5def0CA1287c8FEb2 (main account 4) Received 0.03  ETH from 0x6fBAA88DFD8B16f31eB5e6f25924Fb5DeE39f89F (Main account 3)

Check out : https://etherscan.io/address/0xbce30a5a4160479a6909edd5def0ca1287c8feb2


Transaction Hash : https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9633b8fc3286bcb83d6c8bdedfbd6b8e96382080f4b453b088400ebeec19381f

0xBce30A5a4160479A6909EDD5def0CA1287c8FEb2 sent 0.008 ETH to 0xE9C4F26e4D829373f87B548154eca96eD53175aC

who is 0x44e2a1e469e5eCC2fFf9D9c12b31F564AaDc36F6?

1.anshor1
Date Registered : July 06, 2018, 05:32:17 PM
Profile link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=34308
POA  : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=177448.msg966513#msg966513


Please, take a moment to peruse this evidence

https://etherscan.io/address/0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904


 

"Would it not raise suspicion of all transactions occurred within a single day? Quite dubious, wouldn't you say?"


They attempted to initiate transactions using various wallets, yet but I found that the wallets are connected , forming a singular network (one circle).

[The Hunter]

I am well aware of the identity behind this account. Brace yourself for quite surprising. Additionally, I've stumbled upon compelling evidence concerning one of the judges. Please, do not take offense. May I proceed with initiating a new case regarding one of the judges in question?

[Freemind]

I am well aware of the identity behind this account. Brace yourself for quite surprising. Additionally, I've stumbled upon compelling evidence concerning one of the judges. Please, do not take offense. May I proceed with initiating a new case regarding one of the judges in question?

Thanks again. You can open all cases you find regardless of users and ranks. No matter who is. With the evidence you demonstrate in each case it is beyond any doubt. If the evidence is conclusive as it has been so far in all the cases you have published, there is no problem.

+1

[hugeblack]

I am well aware of the identity behind this account. Brace yourself for quite surprising. Additionally, I've stumbled upon compelling evidence concerning one of the judges. Please, do not take offense. May I proceed with initiating a new case regarding one of the judges in question?

This will be interesting, but since the evidence is linked to one of the judges, the link must be strong, and I expect all members of the forum to try to verify its accuracy, as the integrity of the judge is an essential of the system.

Thanks again. You can open all cases you find regardless of users and ranks. No matter who is. With the evidence you demonstrate in each case it is beyond any doubt. If the evidence is conclusive as it has been so far in all the cases you have published, there is no problem.

How will measures be taken in such cases and how will the judge lose his position?

[Jokers]

Pacar Tiri additionally has a registered warning for AI bot usage. Bad sign which can support the idea that this account can be a part of some farm, because AI usage usually is characteristic for multi account farmers.

[Freemind]

How will measures be taken in such cases and how will the judge lose his position?

The judges, as well as the moderators (local, global, etc.), must respect the rules like the rest of the users. If the evidence is clear and conclusive, the judge would not only lose his position, but would face the penalties dictated by the rules of the forum. That's why I said in my previous post that it doesn't matter who it is.

The fact (supposedly) that those who should care about respecting and providing equal opportunities to all users do precisely the opposite leaves the rest of the staff in a very bad position. And that is something that now, more than ever, we cannot allow.

[Jokers]

wow. sorry, but The Hunter, u should widen ur catches again. 'Would it be "harmful" for us if investigating their accounts too?

No need dictating to other users how they should help the forum. If you want to investigate other forum members and your evidence is strong enough, conduct your own investigation. Other forum members will act according to their own understanding.

[anshor1]

Hello, judge and admin.. all
I would explain that we are a community.
Are communities in crypto that share gas fees and sometimes carry out transactions until the wallet is connected not allowed??
Are there any rules here??
Is this banned in the crypto world??
 
Didn't you see that transaction 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 only transferred the gas fee. Yes, at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked a friend to lend us the gas fee.
And in our community that's normal.
If connected wallets are considered multiple, have their transaction frequency been checked?
Are the transactions frequent??
And if wallet 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 is considered the main account / main wallet, try checking how many coins are there and how big the assets are.
 
The logic is weak if the gas loan and borrowing fee is considered multiple.
It is weak logic if fellow crypto lovers are prohibited from making transactions.
And see wallet 0x44e2a1e469e5eCC2fFf9D9c12b31F564AaDc36F6(elbans) only sent 0.0034 ETH ( $22.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c. And DAMKAR 0x4EE1b083580b1C6792bDD61b3fdC774405b05C9A sent 0.00473 ETH ($16.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c.
This is considered multity??
Sharing gas and transactions with fellow crypto creators is considered to be the same owner ??
Can you prove it??
Accusers must be able to provide evidence, not just throw a hot ball and then leave by getting rewards from their BM.
 
If the IP is the same, it is assumed that it has the same owner??
Have you never been to a cafe that provides free wifi and made a post together?
Do fellow crypto lovers in the real world in the same community never share hotspots??
Can't they meet each other??
Is this prohibited??
 
There should be clear rules in this forum, not allowing you to use wallets that are connected to fellow members in this forum.
So that we can all understand and keep our wallets clean.
because it can only be considered a violation of the law, if there are already regulations. how can we be considered wrong if there are no clear rules governing it.
 
And when the cases raised in this forum court, only gas fee transactions and buying and selling between communities are considered multiple and the owner is considered to be one person, very lucky for those who are experts even though many of the multiple are untouched??
 
What you raise are only cases of careless people, who think connected wallets are normal in the crypto world. Meanwhile, multi owners who are experts in keeping their wallets will always be safe.
 
Try to imagine if hot wallets on Binance or other exchanges could be tracked, how many wallets in the world would be connected.

[Freemind]

I agree with something you said. I think that a specific rule would be very necessary for cases like this, which unfortunately we see more frequently. I have an idea of ​​what that rule might be, but I don't think most users will like it, so before I make my proposal public, I'll think about it and then discuss it with the admin to see what he thinks.

[anshor1]

I agree with something you said. I think that a specific rule would be very necessary for cases like this, which unfortunately we see more frequently. I have an idea of ​​what that rule might be, but I don't think most users will like it, so before I make my proposal public, I'll think about it and then discuss it with the admin to see what he thinks.

Please, as an active official who is currently managing the forum, submit a proposal to the admin regarding clear rules that members must obey.  Because the continuity of this forum, for the sake of the progress of the forum, must be continued.

Most of the members of this forum are a community in the real world, if everyone who is connected is considered multiple, and must be punished, we should have clear rules which, if violated, must be punished.
We must think about the progress of the forum, not just think about careless things which are considered major sins and must be punished.
Shouldn't life have rules, mate?
People can be considered to have made a mistake if there are rules.

If people use the same wallet for several accounts and there is a POA as proof, that is clear proof.
these can be tried and punished.

But if only the wallet is connected, buying and selling transactions between members is considered an error, BM should also include this rule in its general rules.  If there are wallet participants connected, they are considered multiple and cheaters.

Many of our mentors in the community PMed about this issue, he is also one of the former high-ranking officials on this forum.  But currently he is busy in the real world so he hasn't had time to contact the admin to discuss and hasn't had time to return to the forum.
He was just disappointed, this wasn't how it was done.  He has also contributed a lot in the past for the progress of this forum and it is clear that you also know him well.
His message was to take good care of the forum together, don't fight each other.  Because it will damage the forum's reputation.

[hugeblack]

I agree with something you said. I think that a specific rule would be very necessary for cases like this, which unfortunately we see more frequently. I have an idea of ​​what that rule might be, but I don't think most users will like it, so before I make my proposal public, I'll think about it and then discuss it with the admin to see what he thinks.

I do not think such a rule is necessary If we want to prove that the accounts are linked, we need more than one transaction or linked wallet, but rather:

 - Check the similarity in writing style (each of us has a unique writing style and it is difficult to change it)
 - Check account activity: Alternative accounts usually have similar activity in terms of time or the boards they post on.
 - Verify local languages: If the accounts speak different languages, this is evidence that they are not alternative accounts.
 - Check other variables.

If there are accounts that have connected wallets, the same writing style, the same level of activity, the same local language, and the same other variables, then it is definitely an alternative account.

Creating a rule like this will give a free license to any alt account that claims it is a unique account and can say that it is my roommate as we have a common IP address and share the same device and we can do KYC (and here he can pay anyone to do this) and therefore there is no benefit to this board.

Leave things as they are, and if a connection is found, a person can defend himself here. The only problem is the activity of the judges. I did not hear any response from them, even though some cases took more than two weeks.

back to above lets choose @Doctor & @anshor1

Yeah, I think It's safe to invest in TRX.

Yeah , NEO won't better than Ethereum, NEO is just Chinese coin.. Ethereum is the second biggest community in crypto currency. I agree with you, Ethereum will more expensive, Im waiting the ETF Ethereum, If approved I believe Ethereum price will soar

There is a similarity in writing style, posts usually begin with short sentences followed by a comma.
If all accounts follow the same pattern, then we now have a link between them at the blockchain level, and at the writing style level, and so on, checking the rest of the variables until reaching the final result.

I can delve deeper into confirming or denying writing patterns, but what I wanted to say is that there is no fire without smoke, and proving the link between accounts is not just a single transaction.

[anshor1]

There is a similarity in writing style, posts usually begin with short sentences followed by a comma.
If all accounts follow the same pattern, then we now have a link between them at the blockchain level, and at the writing style level, and so on, checking the rest of the variables until reaching the final result.

Hello, hugeblack
If only the similarity of terminology is a proof, and you are discussing the same way of writing it is a multi-indication, why are you only discussing the word " yeah "
you might as well discuss the words "yes I agree, okay, I agree with you, Good Idea, You're right, Yeps... etc"
make it proof that the account is multi.

Why don't you think and try to learn the dialect of each country, English is not native to their country and use a translator.The post results will look the same.

Just at the same time, decide on the opening words that are often used by members here as the basis for the accusation that all accounts are multiple.

Isn't that a common sentence in the market???
This is not a strong basis for answering a case.You should use a more reasonable basis.

[anshor1]

If there are accounts that have connected wallets, the same writing style, the same level of activity, the same local language, and the same other variables, then it is definitely an alternative account.

What you say is all just based on assumptions.  People can have different assumptions and perceptions regarding the things you talk about regarding similarities in writing style, etc.  Sometimes it could happen by chance.  If you make a decision based only on assumptions, then the level of accuracy of the truth of the decision obtained cannot be measured.  In my opinion, this should not be done because it would be too speculative.  Laws should not be based on anything speculative.

[Jokers]

Why don't you think and try to learn the dialect of each country, English is not native to their country and use a translator.The post results will look the same.

No popular online translator was used for these posts (they give results a different way). Which online translator do you use to get these results? I want to try to repeat the same result.

[Freemind]

~

I said I have an idea, but I have to mature it, and if I finally propose it many users will not like it, so I have to think about it more. It is not about being an "official" of the forum or a moderator, it is about trying to contribute useful ideas to improve the forum. Anyway, I'll wait to find out what the judges' decision is and what the bounty managers are discussing in that thread, after that I will decide what to do with the proposal.