Your criteria to grant +/- Karma to someone!

[joniboini]

I don't really give negative karma unless an account is a bot, but I tend to put anyone who posts repeated points, quotes the whole post but only responds to one point, or says low-quality things like "thank you" without further comments, usually end up in my ignore list. It's not like I won't see their posts again in the future, but I feel that they need to make more than one quality post to improve their image and get karma from me. It made me a bit biased if the first few posts that I see from a user are somewhat low-quality. Judging from some of the comments above, are people using AI that prevalent? I tend to find more spammers instead of AI posters.

[SamReomo]

You are doing right, if I am not wrong I only send negative karma twice here until now for the post that made with utternonsense and no one will benefit from reading them

Thanks, and yes you did very well by sending negative karma to the posts which were giving nonsense information that could not be helpful for anyone. It's always better to send negative karma to those who post spam or plagiarized content.

I suggest using - Karma when you feel someone is actually using AI because no one is going to benefit from a genric reply created by bot

That's a quite good suggestion, and yeah I believe we all should try to send as many negative karma to the posts that contain AI generated content as we possibly can. I have personally not seen any posts that contain AI generated content but when I see such posts then definitely I will send negative karma to such posts because those posts are not useful for anyone and such posts allow AI spammers to post more AI generated spam in future.