LIST - Bitcoin mixers & Tumbler services! ✅✅

[bitmover]

That does not sound good. Do you have evidences to support your claims. I agree here with notblox1. Without having a concreate evidence it's not usual to believe the words considering the amount of money they spent in advertising on Bitcointalk forum.

I partially agree. However  , as this information comes from icopress which has a lot more information than us about those services, I certainly wouldn't use that mixer. Specially when there are other more reliable options

[hugeblack]

I partially agree. However  , as this information comes from icopress which has a lot more information than us about those services, I certainly wouldn't use that mixer. Specially when there are other more reliable options

I think we're talking about handling the mixer more than the user experience. I'll ask @NotATether for more details, he already has a list and recently deleted these mixers from it.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I partially agree. However  , as this information comes from icopress which has a lot more information than us about those services, I certainly wouldn't use that mixer. Specially when there are other more reliable options

I am still looking forward to a source to read and verify the news by myself. It's strange that there are no public information available to read. The latest news I found online about yomix is to emerges the top bitcoin mixer. For a mixer, 2 or 5 BTC is just a small amount.

I think we're talking about handling the mixer more than the user experience. I'll ask @NotATether for more details, he already has a list and recently deleted these mixers from it.

bitmixlist.org does not have it now. @NotATether, can we have your source at least?

[dkbit98]

I think we're talking about handling the mixer more than the user experience. I'll ask @NotATether for more details, he already has a list and recently deleted these mixers from it.

I think it's better to create some kind of red (orange, yellow) list of shady mixers and still keep them for informational purposes, than to totally ignore them.
It can be challenging to know what mixers are good and what bad, but I think this can be achieved with community help and posting regular news and updates.
This is just my 2 sats, but it's his list so he can do whatever he wants.

[bitmover]

I think we're talking about handling the mixer more than the user experience. I'll ask @NotATether for more details, he already has a list and recently deleted these mixers from it.

I think it's better to create some kind of red (orange, yellow) list of shady mixers and still keep them for informational purposes, than to totally ignore them.
It can be challenging to know what mixers are good and what bad, but I think this can be achieved with community help and posting regular news and updates.
This is just my 2 sats, but it's his list so he can do whatever he wants.

Yeah, we really need some kind of trust system in this forum.

So we can tag users and services. This would certainly gives more functionality to the forum, and potentially bring more users. As poeple would seek trust information about services here , before using them.

[examplens]

I think it's better to create some kind of red (orange, yellow) list of shady mixers and still keep them for informational purposes, than to totally ignore them.
It can be challenging to know what mixers are good and what bad, but I think this can be achieved with community help and posting regular news and updates.
This is just my 2 sats, but it's his list so he can do whatever he wants.

I added an orange warning next to Yomix in the table from the first post. Referred to the quoted icopress post about it.
Orange, because still not confirmed with proof, even though I don't doubt the icopress words.
Red-coloured warnings would mean that the service is officially recognized as a scam or dysfunctional.

I think that there is no need for a green label because it could favour one over the other. I am also of the opinion that there is no need for an additional list of mixers that have stopped working because they are certainly offline, and even if they were operational they would be on the list.

I know that there are a few more mixers that are not on the list, I will look at them in the next few days to do a complete update.

[dkbit98]

Yeah, we really need some kind of trust system in this forum.

I was not talking about trust system in forum in my previous post, this was strictly related to mixer warnings with colors.
Forum trust can be useful, but it can also create more harm than good.

I added an orange warning next to Yomix in the table from the first post. Referred to the quoted icopress post about it.
Orange, because still not confirmed with proof, even though I don't doubt the icopress words.
Red-coloured warnings would mean that the service is officially recognized as a scam or dysfunctional.

Icopress posted some screenshots with more information about Yomix in bitcointalk forum, so you should check that out:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5477452.msg63892572#msg63892572

[hugeblack]

Icopress posted some screenshots with more information about Yomix in bitcointalk forum, so you should check that out:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5477452.msg63892572#msg63892572

Thanks for sharing the link. I expected the service to be confiscated, but turned into Exxit-Scam Wow [size=78%].[/size]
The color can be converted to red and Yomix can not be trusted.

[icopress]

Сan you sort by the year the mixer was created? Users will see how long ago this or that Bitcoin mixer has been providing its services to users.

[examplens]

The color can be converted to red and Yomix can not be trusted.

You're right, this is ripe for a red mark. I will change it with the next update.

Сan you sort by the year the mixer was created? Users will see how long ago this or that Bitcoin mixer has been providing its services to users.

I didn't deal with sorting on any basis, maybe I prioritized the first few mixers that I used and at some point had personal experience with them.

[examplens]

I just changed to a red warning next to the Yomix name, I also removed the links to their website.
Although the user did not provide clear evidence, this is yet another accusation coming against them. Given that this is already the second known accusation, this is only in the form of prevention.

what happened:

I need to mix bitcoins, so I tried to use yomix (https://[banned mixer]/).

because I trust yomix, I did not check step by step the amount of bitcoins sent to me after each mixing, nor did I check one by one through the blockchain explorer whether I received it Mix Bitcoin (because the yomix website prompts that the sending was successful).

Finally I was surprised to find that the order showed that it was sent successfully, but no Bitcoin was sent to my wallet address (the success deceived my eyes, because at first I thought yomix would not lie to me, but the fact is, after the transaction was completed, the order told me The mix succeeds, the send succeeds, but I don't receive any bitcoins at all).

So I tried submitting multiple tickets to contact order support. It has been 7 days and no one has contacted me and my ticket has not been answered.
The current loss is about US$30,000-40,000.

So, please stay away from this scam site (at least so far my order bitcoins have not been sent to my wallet).

I also hope that yomix can send the funds that originally belong to me after seeing my message, because this is very important to me.

reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.0

[bitmover]

Are those bitcointalk link useful? I think those account are basically all inactive....

Most of them doesn't post since 2023.

While we don't have a privacy/mixer board, we can discuss bitcoin privacy here.

[notblox1]

While we don't have a privacy/mixer board, we can discuss bitcoin privacy here.

We have only few pages are written in this topic so I am not sure if enough members is interested in doing this, but creating a pool could tell us more.
For me it is a good idea to create new Privacy board but I think there is Privacy Coins board, maybe we can use that to write anything connected with privacy:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?board=407.0

[Igebotz]

I just changed to a red warning next to the Yomix name, I also removed the links to their website.
Although the user did not provide clear evidence, this is yet another accusation coming against them. Given that this is already the second known accusation, this is only in the form of prevention.

This is a further draw back of the mixer ban on Bitcointalk: I saw no scams against them during their promotion days on Bitcointalk, and the few issues raised on their ANN were resolved, and everything was running smoothly; their reputation was on the line, and they were competing against other mixers and ruining their services smoothly. Now they're just here and there, with no admin to hold accountable when anything like this occurs; at least on Bitcointalk, we had someone representing the platform.

From paying thousands of dollars per week for promotion to stealing $30,000 is insane; if this is true, then business must be really bad following the mixer ban on BTT. They lost a lot of publicity.

[examplens]

Are those bitcointalk link useful? I think those account are basically all inactive....

Most of them doesn't post since 2023.

They can't even write posts on the Bitcointalk forum, only private messages.
But maybe you're right, considering that not a single mixer represents Btt as an official channel of communication anymore. I will remove the links to Bitcointalk ANNs.

btw. Jambler was kicked out of Bitcointalk because it was marked as a mixer, but still, it doesn't belong on this list.