As A Bounty Hunter - Which System Of Payment Do You Prefer, Stakes Or Fixed Amount?

[yitzjoe]

both of these payment systems together have advantages and disadvantages, but I myself like to be paid weekly and flat. but I will be disadvantaged when when the participants are bounty a little and fixed payments refer to the fixed payment table

[Rituvohra01]

I will prefer the fixed amount system rather than stakes because we can calculate how many tokens we will earn till the end of bounty campaign. If the company is in crisis  we can get our fixed amount for our work.

[Abusadeeq6]

Fixed amount is preferred and always good for bounty hunters. I don't like staking method at all

[pedangrusak]

the payment of the signature campaign will be better if paid fluctuatively according to the number of participants who participate because the fewer participants, the greater the amount of rewards earned

[cashbit]

I support the fixed amount yet it is transparent and easy to know by participants. All people can count the number of tokens they got. This way also make people trust to the bounty program. I think fixed amount should be recommended way in bounty system.

[Anayajurus]

I think if at the very beginning we knew the number of coins that we will receive for this or that activity, it would be much better.

[MUGNIA]

if I read from your statement, it is better to use a fixed payment with a fixed payment. We can predict how many tokens we get at the end of the campaign, but it is still rare for BMs to use this system

[tamango]

I think that fixed payments is the best one because in this way a bounty hunter can know how much he will earn at the beginning of the campaign and this is very important to choose to participate or not in a campaign.

[Annalise]

I prefer the fixed method of payment than the staking method. The fixed method seems to me to be more transparent and organized in a way that as a bounty Hunter you know at a glance of what exactly to be expecting.

[Fenix]

Practically everyone here considers a fixed payment to bounty hunters more preferable than the betting system. I agree that the betting system leaves a lot of room for various kinds of abuse, and above all from the manager of the bounty campaign ICO. Fixed payments in tokens are more reliable. Regardless of the increase in the number of joined participants, we get the agreed amount of tokens.

[balanced]

I like the coin system. If I initially see how much I can get, I am more actively involved in the life of the project.

[bubblebubble]

I see that always more bounty managers offer Ethereum system payment.
This is a good way to attract bounty hunters, because of the inmediate dumps that happen when bounty rewards are distributed.
So, this is also the best way to save projects' interests.

[dentolas]

Definitely the fixed amount payment, and preferably I look for those rare bounties that pay weekly. Stakes system makes it dificult for everyone to calculate how much they will get at the end of the campaign, allows easy changes on the participant limit number (if any) and on the bounty budget.... so I really don't understand the advantages of using this system....

[Volonter]

Personally, I like the betting system.  Because if fewer people participate in the bounty, then the payments will be more!

[noemail]

if I prefer a fixed payment because to calculate the total allocation is clear and of course we will know if there is a shortage of tokens or coins