I do not see a particular problem with that.

I actually think that adding two kinds of links would be more a burden than a benefit. If you don;t like the referral link then just remove it from the URL.

Ok, since you both don't see a problem, I think I overreacted.

I don't think so, but you are big on words and criticism, and you clearly have no idea what it takes to operate any website that was attacked by multiple DDOS attacks...
Blaming someone with statement that ref links are not allowed in forum feels like someone is trying to snitch to admin for something that is clearly allowed
This reminds me a lot on something that happened in bitcointalk forum not long ago...

@dkbit98 Is this your usual way of responding to others, we have

Please READ before commenting anything about this subject.

There is no rule anywhere that is not allowing me to add million ref links on my own website, so this is really silly coming from you.

I don't think so, but you are big on words and criticism, and you clearly have no idea what it takes to operate any website that was attacked by multiple DDOS attacks...

I didn't notice this until you mentioned what happened in the forum, so let me ask you, is that the reason? If it's true then to avoid drama I think it's better to ignore each other, otherwise I'm sorry for thinking about it.

Yes, adding two different links might be burdensome but you could have a disclaimer about the links are referral links. However, that's not needed but if added then I think it won't impact the site in anyway.

+1

I understood that here (as well as on Btt) it is not forbidden to leave a site that can have ref links. (It's OK to remove them if there are any)
What is forbidden is to fill the forum with direct ref links in the post. That would really increase the amount of spam on the forum.

I did not suggest removing them, but putting an option for ref links if you want to support the service.

So what? 
There is no rule anywhere that is not allowing me to add million ref links on my own website, so this is really silly coming from you.

I thought that developing this list was part of an effort to preserve privacy, especially after banning mixing services, but now mixers that have ref links appear first, and some ads appear at the top, so at least leave an option to click on referral links if they want to support the service.

I think because there are alternatives. If it is possible to advertise on Twitter and BTT and advertising on Twitter will achieve a higher return, you will find that the service advertises on Twitter, and there is a service like BESTCHANGE that has an advertising campaign on BTT and they do not have a campaign here, so we can say that BTT is the preferred place for campaigns.
If it is not possible to advertise there (as happened with mixing services), then one of the best alternatives is this forum.

I will keep watching to see if  NotATether gets his  affiliate fees. I hope he does.

On average, if the service does not return within 10 days, we can consider that they have decided to withdraw.

I don't like the concept of staking but it's true that staking your coins on launch pool has been very profitable for many users. Stacking is only profitable for you if you have enough capital but if your capital isn't enough the you won't get good profits from staking.

on launch pool, I do not think it is staking, but it is more like investing or lending, where you get profits because you leave your money with a trusted person for a certain period. As for staking, it works at the level of the protocol for POS coins and according to the conditions, and it may not require a large capital as in ADA.

No point in having an ANN thread if the whole website is down with a 502 Internal Server Error 

It is also suspiciously timed as well!

Edit: I think it is being DDoS attacked. Some other mixers are down too. I will try TOR mirror.

Edit 2: TOR mirror doesn't work either. Doesn't look like a DDoS attack.

I confirm this, the last time I access the service was on 04/27.
Almost two days after what happened with Samourai Wallet

In general, I do not like launchpools because they give CEXs such as Binance and Bitget a greater influence than they have due to their use of customer funds, but in terms of profits, launchpools certainly have profits, but the risks are greater.
You can staking POS and the return will be good if you believe in the project in the long term, otherwise it is better to trade or buy Bitcoin.