Suggestion about giving negative karma

[Jokers]

If negative Karma is given to someone unintentionally then it's okay but when someone doesn't like the way you create a post or they just wants to destroy the reputation of a particular member can use this against them since granting Karma is not limited apart from time restrictions.

Any systematic incorrect actions with karma will be found and treated as they should: the abusers will get penalties, all karma reduced as a way of destroying the reputation will be restored. So better not trying to abuse the karma system, it won't stay unattended.

[Findingnemo]

If negative Karma is given to someone unintentionally then it's okay but when someone doesn't like the way you create a post or they just wants to destroy the reputation of a particular member can use this against them since granting Karma is not limited apart from time restrictions.

Any systematic incorrect actions with karma will be found and treated as they should: the abusers will get penalties, all karma reduced as a way of destroying the reputation will be restored. So better not trying to abuse the karma system, it won't stay unattended.

If the abusers will get into the attention then it's good, I am still trying to understand many things in the forum and I believe most of the things are under the surveillance or admin or mod? Then only it's possible to find habitual offender of these kinds and gave the penalty strikes...

[Agbe]

if he is serious and write the reason and the press send or OK  then it will be given a negative Karma with sending a message to the member tells him the reason for obtaining a negative Karma.

Are you serious? Tell the receiver of the negative karma the reason why he received the negative karma? That is ridiculous. It is a very bad suggestion as for me. The way the negative karma operates in the forum is very good and if there is any suggestions about karma, it should be the link where the positive karma or the negative karma was given and the name of the user is not necessary. At first I was also insisted to display the user but later understood the important of the anonymity then I support the invisible hand.

[DabsPoorVersion]

If negative Karma is given to someone unintentionally then it's okay but when someone doesn't like the way you create a post or they just wants to destroy the reputation of a particular member can use this against them since granting Karma is not limited apart from time restrictions.

Any systematic incorrect actions with karma will be found and treated as they should: the abusers will get penalties, all karma reduced as a way of destroying the reputation will be restored. So better not trying to abuse the karma system, it won't stay unattended.

If the abusers will get into the attention then it's good, I am still trying to understand many things in the forum and I believe most of the things are under the surveillance or admin or mod? Then only it's possible to find habitual offender of these kinds and gave the penalty strikes...

They are not a CCTV 🤣 But you can report it if you feel like you have incorrectly received negative karma, or someone abused the karma feature. The admin is attentive and listens to any complaints especially if it is related to possible abuse. He / They even resolves it by simplifying things and giving you positive karma to compensate for the incorrect karma given to you.