I will put a link to this discussion in the campaign thread to draw the manager's attention to this.
In addition to the aggressiveness of some BTT users and the ease with which a user can lose a spot in a signature campaign, unfortunately it is also easy to get banned.
The users shown in the screenshot you posted were added to my list as of this morning, with the intention of sending them a private message. By the way, @legend45 replied to me and told me that he had read the message I sent him. I hope it helps in some way. I will help as much as possible in the campaign thread with the post you write. A link to this conversation would also be interesting, so that users can value what they have and use it correctly.
Once again @examplens, thank you for your dedication and interest in improving the forum.
+1 , Since this falls under "this user contributes mostly to none crypto topics or very superficial contribution." It is within quality3[1]
But even Zoom 1 membership is no longer a meaningful classification because no penalties have been taken.
@Freemind I hope to send a message to all Zoom 1 members { if they do not change their posting style within 10 days, their signatures will be deleted (they can wear signatures after 3 months if their posting style changes), thus we have guaranteed healthy discussions.}
[1] https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319457.0
Zoom group is still useful for classifying, but it is true that the administrator should possibly allow more moderators to work with that group, since he has other tasks to do.
I agree with you that sending a message to everyone in the zoom group is a good idea, but I think it's the campaign manager who can (and should) push harder on that.