Risikoarme Investitionen sind sehr selten. Aber vielleicht kommen da eher Immobilien für dich in Frage. Bin auch am überlegen mir eine anzuschaffen.

Oh, du hast natürlich Recht, dass es unmöglich ist, so etwas völlig auszuschließen aber je nach Angebot gibt es schon Wege, wie man eher auf ein geringes Risiko hinarbeiten und für mehr Sicherheit sorgen kann. Geht daber aber natürlich auch darum, ob man realistische Erwartungen hat oder nur auf die höchste Rendite abzielt. Jede Form von Geldanlage, egal ob nun Anleihen, Direktinvestments oder Aktien, sollte ja durchdacht sein. Immobilien zählen u.A. ja auch zu den Direktinvesments, muss man aber auch viele Aspekte bedenken.

Hallo miteinander!
Ich weiß, das Forum ist eigentlich auf Kryptowährungen aller Art ausgelegt. Da ich mich aber relativ neu bin, was traden oder anlegen angeht, dachte ich mir, ich stelle mal fragen zu anderen Investitionsmöglichkeiten.
Ich habe jetzt schon häufiger in einigen Artikeln über Direktinvestitionen gelesen und fand das Konzept an und für sich sehr spannend. Bitte ausbessern, wenn ich falsch liege, aber dabei handelt es sich doch um eine Vermögens- oder Kapitalanlagen, die man mit einem Unternehmen tätigt oder?
Finde ich grundsätzlich sehr spannend, weil man damit natürlich das Unternehmen auch unterstützen kann, was widerum gut für die Wirtschaft ist. Dass dabei zusätzlich Geld abgeworfen wird, macht das Ganze natürlich umso attraktiver.
Meine Frage nun, da jedes Investment eigentlich mit Risiko verbunden ist, gibt es denn auch risikoarme Direktinvestitionen oder haben die alle dieselbe "Risikosstufe" (auch wenn sie zB sehr niedrig ist)?

Und denkt ihr, wäre das was für einen Anfänger oder sollte ich mich da nochmals genauer einlesen?

Naja, Krypto ist ja auch eine Form von Investition, insofern braucht man für beides auch Grundwissen über den Markt und seine Vorgänge. Du liegst aber schon korrekt, Direktinvestitionen heißen auch Investitionen in Güter (auch wenn es wirtschaftswissenschalftlich mehrere Deutungen gibt). Du hast bislang noch gar keine Erfahrungen, wie man Investor wird, korrekt? Da würde ich dir dann auf jeden Fall empfehlen erst einmal nur eine überschaubare Summe zu veranlagen aber das ist ja verständlich.

Du solltest dich auf jeden Fall in die Fachtermini einlesen, welches Beratungsbuch ist eigentlich gar nicht so wichtig, wie der Umstand, dass du die Sprache kennen musst und bereit bist dich hinein zu arbeiten. Ein Grundverständnis für Bilanzen, Ratings und Prospekte ist absolut notwendig - immerhin muss man eigene Entscheidungen treffen können. Es gibt je nach Angebot schon sehr erheblich Unterschiede bezüglich der Seriosität. Zu deiner letzten Frage - wie auch Anleihen sind Direktinvestitionen sicher weniger volatil als etwa Aktien und jeder beginnt irgendwo aber eine ausführliche Recherche ist unabdinglich.

In this year, just sitting on all of my investments, cause i missed the perfect time to leave some of them anyway and wait for the storm to pass, which kind of happened. Just adding some new, cheap coins regularily, which i assume could become more interesting for "normal" people on the long run. Of course you can make some money with day-trading in this market too but with all the competition, it would be really hard - which is why i personally prefer long-term-holdings.

Ofc cause of the market volatility during the last months...even while it looks like this is going to be a problem of the past. Those who jumped onto the band-waggon late 2017 have burnt their fingers and are a bit scared even if they are holding onto their coins. If i would own more BTC...still at this point...i would also keep on them cause the big fall was over. Like all goldrushes, there are a lot of winners and ...not-yet-winners. Still, i assume it is going to play out and normalize itself on the long run.

Quote from: Chiannis on April 15, 2018, 03:43:59 AM

Regarding the question how to judge different reviewing sites or more correctly different review outcomes on different sites...this may be a bit contra-logical since we build such sites to help with quick judgements in the first place but if you want to understand such a site, you should dive a bit into the descriptions, how those reviews or - most of the time - the comparable numbers added to each project (stuff like Marketing: 7/10 points or Team: 8/10 points ) are created.  Sometimes the makers of the site make some kind of equation which they apply with respect to all available information, sometimes its more of a group-thinking thing and its just the average result from all global reviews of its members. If you find out how a site does create its numbers, you can also decide yourself, if you think their process is helpful to the kind of decision you wish to make. ;-)

Icobench for example also works with average numbers but since you are able to read every single review which participated to reach this outcome, you can judge the outcome in a transparent way and just disregard singular opinions which - in your eyes - are, for example, biased or concentrating on faults which you don't think are that important.

Absolutely brilliantly put! Thanks!! So basically the best way of going about doing this is to check out the different review sites, make sure I know what the review is based on and then decide what aspects are the most important to me. Cultural coin is actually pretty helpful in that way since they post all the sites they are listed on on their own website - makes my research easier. Generally speaking though these sites are sooo useful! There are so many projects out there and I would have a hard time judging all by myself. Do you guys also ask about the projects in forums or do you only trust your own research?

My pleasure, glad if you lked my little explanation, i assumed it would be easier like that to understand the concept. Yeah, since the teams behind the currencies got an interest of their own to include all mainstream review sites...and maybe also a few "friendly" non-mainstream ones, any interested person usually does not need to look for a long time to find the necessary information. If this ticketing with cryptocurrency project you are interested in also promotes those sites, i guess they are pretty happy with the results ...or at least the attention.  ^^

Well, if i stumble over a new project i do the typical thing - finding out if it is legit by clicking through their homepage. If something is fishy, i research it some more and then i check review sites and double-check their findings with my own...that way i am always secure.

Regarding the question how to judge different reviewing sites or more correctly different review outcomes on different sites...this may be a bit contra-logical since we build such sites to help with quick judgements in the first place but if you want to understand such a site, you should dive a bit into the descriptions, how those reviews or - most of the time - the comparable numbers added to each project (stuff like Marketing: 7/10 points or Team: 8/10 points ) are created.  Sometimes the makers of the site make some kind of equation which they apply with respect to all available information, sometimes its more of a group-thinking thing and its just the average result from all global reviews of its members. If you find out how a site does create its numbers, you can also decide yourself, if you think their process is helpful to the kind of decision you wish to make. ;-)

Icobench for example also works with average numbers but since you are able to read every single review which participated to reach this outcome, you can judge the outcome in a transparent way and just disregard singular opinions which - in your eyes - are, for example, biased or concentrating on faults which you don't think are that important.

Hi guys! I am wondering what the advantages of having no airdrop are for investors? I've been looking at the Cultural Coin recently and read that they have no airdrop. Does that mean any advantages for investors? 

Well, on the one hand, no airdrop could mean that the leaders of a project believe it is "strong" enough without additional free pr or "forcing" more people to have at least some skin in the game  and on the other hand, if there is a clear roadmap before some ICO starts and the number of coins is exactly described etc...either they planned from the start to give away a part of the coins...not a good look for the actual buyers...or they are changing their plans like that in the mid of the project...also not exactly creating a lot of trust. So if the people behind this ticketing project you are interested in aren't doing an aidrop, don't worry...and cryptothief ofc also got a point, re: the limited effects. 

Absolutely not, imho but i think it is very likely that it could become multiple as valuable as right now - like ETH its able to build its own specialized sub-area of functionality, so i guess its deservedly seens as one of the top5 coins-