You have received -1 Negative Karma

[yahoo62278]

I have seen where Negative karma is described as Negative karma is given to users who are misbehaving, breaking the rules, being aggressive or disruptive to the forum. This can be found in this topic https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=657.0

I pop on a few times a day and make a post or 2. Where I post varies, I like the forum section and I like the gambling section mostly. I also have the notification bot enabled to let me know if someone has mentioned me in a reply so I can read their reply and respond if needed. Today the bot went off with this message You received -1 Negative Karma. Total received Karma 94.
Follow the rules, and keep posting good, helpful topic to avoid getting Negative Karma.

Normally I could care less who agrees or disagrees with my opinion as we are all different and everyone is never going to agree with a person all the time, but I am pretty sure I have tried not to be too aggressive or misbehave on here thus far.

Reading the noti that I got it says follow the rules (check), keep posting good, helpful topic (check) to avoid getting neg karma. OK now the question is, how do I know where I am misbehaving, breaking rules, or being aggressive if I have no clue who gave me the neg karma or what post the neg karma was given to? How can I be better about whatever issue someone had, if I don't know the issue that person had.

I am of the opinion that who and when you were given + or - karma should be public knowledge. I see no reason to keep it hidden honestly. If it's hidden what's the point in having it?

Wouldn't mind some constructive opinions on the topic and maybe I'll gain a different perspective on the topic.

I gree with you most people don't deserve they negative Krama given to them. Some of the people giving the negative Krama only feel on their own side of views that this post of the individual is not qualify and most of this person are not professional enough just have little IQ on cryptocurrency

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

[Peter90]

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

I agree 100% yahoo
on the other side, I don't know what is worse, to penalize a profile when he writes something you disagree with or to threaten someone to penalize his profile if he writes something you disagree with 

[bitterguy28]

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

This is not just an admittance of being a loser or abusing the system because it is normal to disagree in some matter that we don't share beliefs or knowledge and with that if you cannot stand the disagreement and cannot protect your stand in that matter then why not just ignore that account or leave so there would never more discussion.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

I agree 100% yahoo
on the other side, I don't know what is worse, to penalize a profile when he writes something you disagree with or to threaten someone to penalize his profile if he writes something you disagree with 

They are basically the same thing, giving someone a negative Karma to show your disagreement with their opinion is absolutely wrong, and also threatening to give someone a negative Karma if the post something you don't like or agree with is also very wrong.

But when it comes to a user spreading fake news, such user spreading the fake news actually deserves a negative Karma as a warning to him or her to desist from doing such, but this is if only and when there is a verifiable proof that is beyond all reasonable doubt, that what that user posted is fake news, because disagreeing with someone's post, does not mean that what that person shared is fake news, you have to have clear and undoubtable proof or evidence that what the user shared is a fake news, and this proof or evidence have to be accepted by atleast, two or more users, before you giving that person a negative Karma can be justifiable.

[Paragon2]

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

I agree 100% yahoo
on the other side, I don't know what is worse, to penalize a profile when he writes something you disagree with or to threaten someone to penalize his profile if he writes something you disagree with 

The op must know that, somewhere that made a mistake.  And got the gift of karma but my question is and know where did everyone go wrong and got negative karma on what subject. If you get a negative karma gift how do you know what post you got on and where you went wrong? 
Do you find room for improvement? 
This topic is created to express that.

[Power420]

I would rather a user that disagrees with my opinion to just scroll on by vs giving me a neg karma because we don't agree. That to me is promoting negativity.

Karma shouldn't be weaponized by anyone.

I agree 100% yahoo
on the other side, I don't know what is worse, to penalize a profile when he writes something you disagree with or to threaten someone to penalize his profile if he writes something you disagree with 

The op must know that, somewhere that made a mistake.  And got the gift of karma but my question is and know where did everyone go wrong and got negative karma on what subject. If you get a negative karma gift how do you know what post you got on and where you went wrong? 
Do you find room for improvement? 
This topic is created to express that.

This question must be asked to the admin to get a proper answer. As more forum updates and Karma ke dil kon poste dil views must be seen. If the admin updates it, then it will be possible to spot these mistakes very easily.

[Jokers]

This question must be asked to the admin to get a proper answer. As more forum updates and Karma ke dil kon poste dil views must be seen. If the admin updates it, then it will be possible to spot these mistakes very easily.

admin already stated that pointing which post got +karma or -karma is in his to do list, but this list is long, so let's be patient and wait for the implementation of this feature.

[racham02]

I'm also afraid of getting negative karma, I know I'm not the only one.  even if we follow Rules/guidelines and even though you did nothing wrong, there are other people who don't like your post, or don't like yours.we don't even know who will give us negative karma because there are no mechanics in the forum to know who is giving.  that's why we're just being careful with what we post so that no one gets offended. I hope I don't get negative karma now and in the future

[Freemind]

I'm also afraid of getting negative karma, I know I'm not the only one.  even if we follow Rules/guidelines and even though you did nothing wrong, there are other people who don't like your post, or don't like yours.we don't even know who will give us negative karma because there are no mechanics in the forum to know who is giving.  that's why we're just being careful with what we post so that no one gets offended. I hope I don't get negative karma now and in the future

I think you place too much importance (as other users do) on receiving negative karma, and it's actually not that serious. Any user can give negative karma to another, for ethical reasons or not, but you can also receive positive karma for contributing to the forum and creating interesting conversations. There are much worse things than receiving negative karma, such as having the red dot on the profile (zoom 1) for not declaring multiple accounts on the forum. That, among other things, will make it impossible for the user to participate in signature campaigns...

[Agbe]

There are much worse things than receiving negative karma, such as having the red dot on the profile (zoom 1) for not declaring multiple accounts on the forum. That, among other things, will make it impossible for the user to participate in signature campaigns...

Exactly. The red bar on a profile speaks more louder than the -Karma itself. Though when you received -Karma it is painful but when you do well and create good content then when more positive karmas inflow then your negative karma you were angry with would be a thing of the past. But the red bar has different interpretation about the user. Probably he is spammer, shitposter, scammer etc. And the worst of them all you can't use the account to participate in signature campaigns, and bounty hunting.

[JoyMarsha]

I agree with this, for one to know who gave them negative or positive karma and for what reason they are given the karma.

I have been trying to ask this, but thank goodness you did, so that it can be looked into to make functioning by knowing who and who gave you karma. It is really somehow for someone not to know who gave them a positive or negative without knowing the reason for it.

[Gurujebs]

This might have been discussed here but I think I need to drop my input. So, some days ago, I was just taking my time here and all of a sudden I just got a telegram notification to that I have received a negative karma and I should improve my post. That's fine but can I atleast know the post that was given the negative karma atleast? This is not too much to ask for right?

If Admin allow this and implement it, people will know where the negative energy is coming from and perhaps if there is a reason to ask public about why the post was given a negative, it can be look upon and this will stop people that might be playing around with karma hate.

[Freemind]

This might have been discussed here but I think I need to drop my input. So, some days ago, I was just taking my time here and all of a sudden I just got a telegram notification to that I have received a negative karma and I should improve my post. That's fine but can I atleast know the post that was given the negative karma atleast? This is not too much to ask for right?

If Admin allow this and implement it, people will know where the negative energy is coming from and perhaps if there is a reason to ask public about why the post was given a negative, it can be look upon and this will stop people that might be playing around with karma hate.

It was already mentioned that the administrator is working on a karma counter that will appear in each posts to know which of them has the best and worst results. There is no official release date yet, so you will have to be patient, but don't worry, it will be a fact.

[Thyplaymaker]

This might have been discussed here but I think I need to drop my input. So, some days ago, I was just taking my time here and all of a sudden I just got a telegram notification to that I have received a negative karma and I should improve my post. That's fine but can I atleast know the post that was given the negative karma atleast? This is not too much to ask for right?

If Admin allow this and implement it, people will know where the negative energy is coming from and perhaps if there is a reason to ask public about why the post was given a negative, it can be look upon and this will stop people that might be playing around with karma hate.

It was already mentioned that the administrator is working on a karma counter that will appear in each posts to know which of them has the best and worst results. There is no official release date yet, so you will have to be patient, but don't worry, it will be a fact.

Would be nice and helpful too, so that one can be able identify the reason he or his where given a negative karma and would be able to know how to prevent such from happening again without knowing the users that gave he or she the -karma . Like back then the admin mentioned something like , his aim of not reviewing karma sender is to prevent karma war and to secure a peaceful community.

Well i just hope that the  feature of being able to see the post that received karma , should come very soon.

[Freemind]

Exactly. The red bar on a profile speaks more louder than the -Karma itself. Though when you received -Karma it is painful but when you do well and create good content then when more positive karmas inflow then your negative karma you were angry with would be a thing of the past. But the red bar has different interpretation about the user. Probably he is spammer, shitposter, scammer etc. And the worst of them all you can't use the account to participate in signature campaigns, and bounty hunting.

Getting positive karma is infinitely easier in time and effort than removing the red dot from the profile. I've read numerous posts from users "scared" of receiving negative karma, and it's something that is hard for me to understand, because receiving positive karma is not difficult. Let's make quality posts, let's help other users, let's listen to those who think differently from us... Keeping an open mind not only allows us to help, but it also keeps us learning.

I think the best thing is that even if they have the red dot on the profile, the affected users have the possibility to show that they want to change their behavior, and that over time, the red dot can disappear from their profiles. So no one will have an excuse not to try to improve.

I don't know exactly when that will be, but we'll have an update on the quality bar soon.