Craig Wright claims to be the infamous Satoshi Nakamoto, however, many experts and early people involved in bitcoin refute his claims.for one, many believe the late
Hal Finney to be the real satoshi :
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=119758.0But now let's see why Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto.The below points prove that Craig Wright has been found lying and deceitful on multiple occasions. I am going to collect information from around the web, thus credit goes to original posters.
1- The PGP keys which allegedly tie Wright to Nakamoto are not convincing and fake according to many.
ReferenceFirst, they are alleged to have been created at a certain point in time, but there are good reasons to think not. No one has found a source for the key in logs from that time, and the ciphers used to create the key were either not common at the time or not in existence at the time. It is trivial to forge the creation date on a PGP key (just set the clock on your computer back). So if you were trying to fool an unsophisticated reporter, this would be a good trick to try.
Second, one of the keys is linked to an address very similar to a known Nakamoto email address
[email protected] , but which is generally unknown to have ever been used by Nakamoto
[email protected].
Also, It's also possible to create a PGP key with a fake date from an email account you don't control.
2- Craig Wright's blog posts from 2009 that supposedly contained key pieces of evidence confirming he was Satoshi Nakamoto were shown to have been created or edited afterwards between 2013-2014 but deceptively dated as 2009.
Reference3- Craig registers the copyright for the bitcoin whitepaper, a copyright can be registered by anyone! And then he uses that to claim to the media again that he is satoshi.
Feel free to add any more weird, fraudulent and inconsistent behavior by Craig Wright!