follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Author Topic: Lawsuit Against Nano Devs Commences, ‘Rescue Fork’ Requested for BitGrail Funds  (Read 1405 times)

Offline PRIBO247

  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Activity: 1071
  • points:
    900
  • Karma: 6
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 3
  • Last Active: April 09, 2019, 01:08:13 PM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 21
    Badges: (View All)
    10 Posts First Post Sixth year Anniversary
A class action lawsuit that was filed in April of 2018 has
commenced against the creators of the Nano ( NANO)
cryptocurrency, in which the plaintiffs allege that developers
“violated federal securities laws.” The lawsuit is being handled by
Silver Miller Law and Levi Korsinsky, LLP, both US-based firms
specializing in securities fraud and/or investment loss.

Specifically, the suit claims that developers of Nano - which was
previously called “RaiBlocks” before a rebrand earlier this year -
“recklessly” encouraged plaintiffs to buy the cryptocurrency on a
little known Italy-based exchange called BitGrail, which at the
time hosted most of RaiBlocks’ trading volume.

BitGrail (now apparently non-functional ) claimed to be hacked last
February, but was generally accused of conducting an exit scam .
The event caused the value of then-RaiBlocks to plunge 20% in
price. Almost $200 million worth of RaiBlocks tokens were either
stolen or removed from the exchange.
Notably, the founder of BitGrail Francesco Firano asked the
RaiBlocks(/Nano) developers at the time to hardfork the currency
in order to return users’ funds to them, à la the Ethereum hardfork
which birthed Ethereum Classic. The developers refused.
However, the current lawsuit formally requests that Nano
developers conduct such a “‘rescue fork’ or some other procedure”
in order to reimburse burned investors.

Securities Violation
There are altogether eleven charges brought against the team, two
of them being often-cited violations of Sections 12(a)(1) and 15(a)
of the US Securities Act of 1933 .
The filing claims that “the success of the investment opportunities
and any potential returns thereon were entirely reliant on
Defendants’ ability to maintain and expand the functionality and
popularity of [RaiBlocks/Nano], thus providing financial returns to
investors.”

Whether or not - and which - cryptoassets are considered
securities under US law is still a murky and inchoate issue.
Although at least two of the best known digital assets, Bitcoin and
Ethereum, have been grandfathered in as non-securities, perhaps
the next-best known one - XRP - is still languishing in legal limbo.

https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/01/

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here


 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod