follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitmover

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 41
1
Well, I have been spreading awareness everywhere about phishing; unfortunately, I was the victim last night when an email was phished at midnight, and I did not have access to my desktop or laptop. I did not doubt the email because it was exclusively for airdrop farming. Since I was on my mobile, I did not check that email's URL and sender. I clicked on the link and went ahead and connected the metamask wallet. It takes only a few seconds to drain my entire wallet. Fortunately, The contract did not drain all the chains. The blast and Arbitrum chains were drained, and the ETH and Avalance chains weren't affected.

Sorry for your loss. Everyone can make a mistake.

I avoid keeping more than a few bucks on my mobile wallets. At most the price of the phone (my personal limit)

I don't have metamask in my mobile, just in my desktop. Maybe it is a good practice,  to avoid interacting with smartcontracts in the phone

2
Technical Discussion / Re: How viable is PoW for new coin?
« on: Today at 02:14:37 AM »
Which is why some altcoin users then share their database, to avoid the whole painful process of verification (or, users can use only SPV nodes, but still, someone has to run a node, to serve them properly).

Interesting post.

I think not many people run nodes for pow altcoins.

Exchanges probably do, as they shouldn't trust a third party. But I don't see why regular people would run a litecoin node or a btg node for example.

3
Campaign manager is 1 route to go, but the company could also do a review campaign. A manager can help with that as well, but isn't always needed. Companies can research and do this on their own if they have a little sense.

I like reviews campaigns. I have participated in many of them, and sometimes I continue to use the service afterwards

Projects only pays for positive reviews, which is why they rarely assign this work to a reputable campaign manager who will pay for honest ratings (poor or good). .

I have made dozens of reviews in bitcointalk. They always paid me correctly, and there wasn't an "positive review' obligation.

I think most services even like when you govee constructive feedback, as they can improve.

4
Campaign manager is 1 route to go, but the company could also do a review campaign. A manager can help with that as well, but isn't always needed. Companies can research and do this on their own if they have a little sense.

I like reviews campaigns. I have participated in many of them, and sometimes I continue to use the service afterwards

5
In the part about censorship resistance, he drops this gem:

Quote
Maybe in a few years, we will come to the conclusion that we should separate money from the state for the same reason we separated the church from the state
This is also what Satoshi wanted when he created BTC: a currency that is not dependent on any individual or organization. However, this is quite difficult to achieve for many reasons, and at present we do not see BTC becoming a currency, it is still considered a commodity, asset or investment related to technology.

I use it a lot as a currency.

As payment for campaigns. As a webdev I receive payments in btc many times.
Some years ago I wrote in a news website which paid me in btc as well. I think it works very well as a currency.

Maybe not so good to buy a coffee, but it is a currency.

6
Technical Discussion / Re: How viable is PoW for new coin?
« on: May 13, 2024, 07:07:33 PM »
I think most new coins don't get attacked because what is left of miners is desperate to keep them alive, but in reality, their protection against someone willing to do harm is minimal.

I agree. New pow coins and all btc forks are not safe.

Miners dont attack because it isnt profitable for them usually, unless they make a very profitable double spend over an exchange.. which is also problematic,  because they would be committing a crime and they could have problems to spend/clean those coins. And the value would also drop... making the attack less profitable

7
~snip~
...people should use DAI instead of USDT in my opinion (EU users, be careful USDT will be banned in June for the whole EU).


I didn't know that the EU geniuses would do it, but it has been a big wish of some people from the ECB for years, especially their chief CL, who otherwise has a similar position on cryptocurrencies as, for example, the well-known SEC chairman. Given that I do not use stablecoins, this decision will not affect me, but it is really funny to me that they are fighting in such radical ways against everything they consider a threat to the euro - but they are obviously learning from their political brothers across the big pond.
They feel threatened at least for the Euro, so they decided that it is best to ignore the problem.  :o The old school of politicians really needs to retire, they have a hard time adapting.

Even users who do not hold usdt can be affected. I think stablecoins are among the best altcoins out there.

Stablecoins are a convenient and somewhat private (more than banks). I have received a few times as a webdev, and converted to btc.

8
Prediction 2: 62929
Bech32 bc1q8jr7cf3lgp64xsntx69m0l6z4acd7ryynua8ak

9
Great job buddy, those guys often shit their announcement thread with alt accounts to get some attention but they don't understand that newbie accounts aren't trusted by anyone and even if the continue shilling the thread it won't give them desired results.
It's probably an old technique to use the SEO power of the host (forum in this case) as a result when someone searches for a certain service and gets a lot of positive feedback. It can be difficult for someone from the outside to distinguish fake from real comments because they probably don't understand the hierarchy of the forum.

I this is not just SEO. It will also create fake reviews , giving a false authority to the service which isn't well established yet.

A good company could hire a campaign manager to properly handle the community

10
I always find it very good to listen to Antonopoulos.

It had been a while since I heard anything from him, and today I came across this very cool video that I watched again

Five pillars of open blockchains
eature=shared

In the part about censorship resistance, he drops this gem:

 
Quote
Maybe in a few years, we will come to the conclusion that we should separate money from the state for the same reason we separated the church from the state

11
Criptomoedas surpreendem e chegam a a 4%, mais do que investimentos tradicionais como tesouro direto e bolsa de valores.



Lamentável ver o jogo do tigrinho é a poupança isolados na frente .

12


Anyone faced this issue?, probably I faced this couple of times already and I decided to report cause this is actually due to bug since I am not logged in at the moment on any other device nor connected via proxy network.

Is this due to also increase in the traffic?

I face this sometimes too.
Sometimes I didn't made any post in the last hour and I still get this error.. quite annoying if you lose your text...

13
Bitcoin Forum / Re: The anti-mixer arm of Congress
« on: May 13, 2024, 03:25:03 PM »
BTC mixing is a serious problem in this market and we still haven't found the most appropriate way to view them. Many people support Mixers because they care about anonymity, but many others also oppose Mixers because Mixers can be exploited by criminals. Personally, I just want BTC to be more widely accepted, which means BTC needs to comply with anti-money laundering laws. I don't want BTC to be delisted from CEXs like many other privacy coins in the market.


I think that mixers aren't the problem, but the criminals who use them (with are just a small part of their users).

Sadly, privacy is becoming harder and harder to achieve just because this anti money laundry war doesn't care about citizens rights for privacy.

14
So DO NOT use crypto exchange URLs from the deep web. Only use the ones from this forum, Bitcointalk, or kycnot.me.

This is always a good security procedure.
Double check with their social media profile (or forum profile) every URL of the services you are going to send money to.

15
Clearly, coins with a history with a casino or mixer aren't a problem if they're the user's only red flag, but if other flags are present, they'll use this as a pretext to justify asking for the origin of the funds.
As things stand, it would be best if the feds confiscate all the coins at some point, after that all the coins will be clean. After their "mixing", there is no need to look into the earlier history of the coin.  ::)

Exchanging coins to usdt I think is always safe.
All usdt are supposedly clean

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 41
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod