follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TokFlow

Pages: [1]
1
Hi guys, it’s Alex again!

In the previous article, we shed light on the roles and position of the actual leading players when trading QATAR 2022 TOKEN (FWC) and it turns out that after Market Makers had dumped a great deal of FWC into the market, this project is now mostly based on the community to develop. Perhaps, there will be a price adjustment for FWC to hit new heights in the near future concerning the 2022 FIFA World Cup looming. Today, let’s dig deep into another significant indicator to learn more about the trading volume of QATAR 2022 TOKEN.



This is the interface of the TokFlow Volume Tracking dashboard. The Chart Volume above illustrates the detailed volume of Qatar 2022 Token including the total volume, real volume and fake volume by weeks. It is noticeable that on 23 September 2022, the total trading volume of FWC skyrocketed to more than 60 quadrillion (equivalent to over $8M), which is 12 times more than last week. It’s also important to note that during this time, the fake volume of FWC outnumbered the real volume.

After hitting the peak in just a few days, the total volume of transactions of FWC dropped sharply to only 2 quadrillion (equivalent to $250K) with the real volume and fake volume following the parallel trend. In light of these metrics, we can come to a conclusion that a great number of bots have been actively involved in FWC. The substantial fake volume along with enormous growth in a short time frame indicate that this is a pump-and-dump token with the interference of Market Makers.

Now let’s move to the Balance on Exchange chart which shows the volume of Qatar 2022 Token on both CEX and DEX by days:



From this chart, we can see that the volume of FWC on both CEX and DEX has an upward trend. Most Qatar tokens are traded on some reputable centralized exchanges namely Gate.io, Mexc.com, BitMart, and Hotbit. It’s observable that this token is only listed on one decentralized exchange - PancakeSwap. With moderate but steady increase, it’s proved that there is a relatively good trading volume for Qatar 2022 Token on DEX as well as a demand for this token.

In comparison with CEX, we can see that BitMart is a remarkable exchange owning the most tokens with Wallet 2 receiving a huge amount of FWC. However, I noticed a sudden gain in the volume of FWC on CEX in a short period from 9 to 18 October when it increased from 0.55% to 0.85%. This reveals a high probability of FWC being dumped on a massive scale as well as traces of price manipulation from MM.



Taking a look at the Long-term and Short-term Holder chart, it is apparent that the amount of Qatar 2022 tokens held by Long-term holders is relatively considerable, accounting for about 14% while the amount of tokens belonging to the Short-term group only makes up 0,1% of the total supply. However, on 30 October 2022, the token balance of both witnessed such a rapid fall as it came back to zero, which means that the FWC army had dumped all of the tokens they held for a long time into the market without leaving anything in their wallets and showed no sign of accumulating more at the moment. This can be a negative indication for Qatar 2022 Token due to the fact that both long-term and short-term holders see no potential in this Fan Token.

After all, Qatar 2022 Token is a token created for Qatar football lovers as a way for fans to support the club. It's pretty much the same as a meme coin in the market which mostly relies on the news related to the improvement of the token use case. Considering its minimal utility, the potential price growth is not high since it depends on the popularity of the club and the use of the token itself in the future. As I’ve analyzed and tracked its volume of transactions, this Fan Token shows some signs of a pump-and-dump scheme. So if you’re planning to invest in any type of Fan Token, it’s of utmost importance to do your own research into the roadmap and utility of that token as well as tracking the on-chain data to identify the real and fake volume, thereby making informed decisions. This is when TokFlow AI comes in to give you an edge.

That’s the end of Alex’s on-chain analysis of Qatar 2022 Token. Let me know what you think in the comments section!

2
Cryptocurrency Trading / What Really Drives the Value of Qatar 2022 Token?
« on: November 03, 2022, 04:10:26 AM »
Welcome back to Alex’s on-chain analysis.

Recently we have witnessed the rise of Fan Tokens related to the football teams on Binance. One of the most outstanding examples is Qatar 2022 Token, named after the football team in the upcoming World Cup, scheduled to be held in Qatar at the end of November this year. Especially on Pancakeswap, we can see the increasing development of this token with massive gains in such a short time. So is this project creditable or just another scam? What really drives the value of this token? Let's explore the answer with Alex! As usual, I will utilize TokFlow AI to analyze the token price movement along with the money flow of the actual major players in the networks.

In the first place, let me guide you through the Trending Soon dashboard at TokFlow homepage which enables you to partially predict the market trend by finding the most popular cryptocurrencies that people are searching for.



It is obvious that Qatar 2022 Token (FWC) is currently on rank #4 in the Top Trending Gainers, which means that it is likely to increase in price within 1 week. However, one of its major drawbacks is not being listed in the top 10 tokens in the Trending Soon. Probably, in the near future, the FWC price might not make a strong upward move. Nevertheless, the team’s performance in the upcoming World Cup can be one of the deciding factors that greatly influence the token value.



As you can see from the Overview dashboard above, the current live price of Qatar 2022 Token at the time of writing is around 0.000000000111, which is down more than 6% in the last 24 hours. More importantly, according to the TokScore, the Qatar token only gains an “Average” score of 38 based on a 100-point scale, which is quite close to the “Poor” level. Based on the metrics compiled by TokFlow Analyst, we can clearly see the weakness of Qatar 2022 Token with little likelihood of an increase in price in the near future.

In the following part, I’ll be taking an in-depth look at the behaviors of Smart Money wallet to see its role in influencing the price of Qatar 2022 Token:



It is evident that Smart Money has played a large part in determining the price of FWC since the token was first launched in February 2022. In just one month after its release, the FWC price suddenly skyrocketed from 0.0000000000080 (10 Feb 2022) to an ATH of 0.0000000042361 (10 Mar 2022). During March, we also notice an abnormally large buying and selling volume of almost 600K from Smart Money wallets. Beyond doubt, Smart Money mostly participated in the pricing process as well as manipulating the market by pumping and dumping the token at the same time.

In Q2 and Q3, the FWC price kept moving sideways until Smart Money stockpiled a small amount of tokens up to 18K on 17 Sep 2022, which pushed the price to 0.00000000249, and then quickly sold them out. As such, the value of Qatar 2022 Token was greatly driven by Smart Money’s pump-and-dump scheme.



Looking at the Smart Money Asset Percentage Chart, we can see that this wallet is now holding almost 83% of Qatar tokens with a total asset of over $578K, a modest number. It is interesting to note that the Total Value Out ($6M) is larger than the Total Value In ($5M), which shows that MM had dumped such a huge volume of tokens into the market without leaving anything in the wallet.



Tracking the data from Profit/Loss Average, I spot that most of the major players in the networks have enjoyed such a high profit from investing in Qatar 2022 Token in the last 1 month, except for a slight loss from Smart Money and Retail Investors wallet cluster between May and August 2022. In particular, Devs and Funds wallet was 100% profitable without any loss, which shows that they are likely to dump the token if there is a spike in price.

Now, let’s pay a close attention to the Holder Tracking dashboard:



While Smart Money is only holding 9.84% of FWC, the other key players including Devs & Funds, Whales-Sharks, and Retail Investors appear to be the biggest holders with the current asset being over $1M. This suggests that the community is taking keen interest in the Qatar 2022 token as they gain a high profit when investing in this token. With these factors in mind, it can be deduced that after the strong dumping force of MM, the project is now based on the community to develop. There are chances that the leading players apart from Smart Money will wait for a price adjustment in the near future to dump the tokens.

Obviously, this is the hottest time for football token projects to bloom and the value of their fan token cryptos will rise in the run-up to the event. However, it’s highly recommended that you should do your due diligence before making important investment decisions. Of course, in the end the decision is still yours. Good luck and see you in the next article!

3
Hi Alex’s readers, how’s everything today?
As part of the series analyzing the list of Fan Tokens, I will provide my dearest readers with information about Santos FC Fan Token (SANTOS) - one of the Fan Tokens that has gained popularity in the market in recent days.
Compared to LAZIO, SANTOS is in a fairly high price range at 13.3 (about 4 times higher than LAZIO).



Going through some information from the TokFlow Overview interface, SANTOS is showing quite a positive signal when the current TokScore is 61/100 with 75% of $SANTOS community making predictions that it will increase in the future.
I will elaborate more on the Tokscore index which is calculated based on the metrics of Real Volume (30%), Source (30%), Price change (20%), Number of holders (15%), and other social metrics such as the increase in interaction on networking sites, the number of followers and subscribers (5%), thereby scoring the token's strength/weakness based on a 100-point scale. For $SANTOS, the score is in the range of "Average”, in close proximity to the “Good” level. This shows the potential of a bullish trend for this token.
With such a pretty good index, it’s worth noticing how the big and small money flows regard $SANTOS?
As usual, we cannot ignore the significant factor that has the strongest influence on the token price - Smart Money:



It can be seen that, for Santos, Smart Money was active only in the first 6 months when this token was listed on the exchange, and was highly active between March and May of this year:
With the highest buying price of $978K (March 11) and the highest sell price of $836K, Smart Money successfully pushed $SANTOS price from about 2.1 (late February) to 8.7 (March 12).
And once again, with the highest buying price of $817K (May 18), and the highest selling price of $856K (May 18), Smart Money also pushed the lowest $SANTOS price from 1.7 (May 16). ) to hit the peak at 6.7 (May 18) after only 2 days.
In this fourth quarter, Smart Money's activity was at a standstill. However, the token price increased quite high (reaching a peak of 25.2 on September 24, 2022), also during this time, the highest figure in Q4 was recorded for buyers were $158K (September 23, 2022); $151K (August 17, 2022) and $140K (September 23, 2022) for sellers. This proves that the community is quite interested in $SANTOS, so there is no need for MM to put too much effort in pumping the price.
This can be shown in other Smart Money metrics:



Buy orders scattered from $19,000 to $20,500. The largest buy order executed was worth $20,377 from wallet 0x08493d163de902cd289ae51406fe4ec8385634d2.



Sell orders scattered from $10,000 to $31,000. The largest sell order executed at $31,012 coming from wallet 0xa38c28f8049d95a0ef025cfbd3a2bff6ab2692c9.



Total assets of Smart Money wallets are currently worth $716K, a modest number. There’s only 2.92% holding SANTOS, while the Total Value In is $20.9M, and the Total Value Out is $20.3M. This indicates that MM has transferred most of the cash flow and left only a relatively small amount in the wallet.

With the average buying and selling price of SANTOS tokens ranging from $8.6 - $8.5$ and a very high profit of 163%, it is very likely that Smart Money will dump if there is a strong $SANTOS bull run coming. However, how massive the sell-off is depends on the volume of tokens that Smart Money holds. Holding a quite small volume at the moment, it’s necessary for Smart Money to have a strong adjustment to accumulate a large volume of tokens as well as ensuring its control of the community.

So, which situation will be more likely to take place, especially in the context that the community is giving a lot of favor to the SANTOS token. Will Smart Money wait for a strong adjustment to accumulate more or will the price pump greatly for MM to dump it? The answer will be found in the next article. Stay tuned with Alex!

4
Cryptocurrency Trading / 3 Indicators You Should Use to Track $LAZIO
« on: October 25, 2022, 09:14:20 AM »
Hello my dear readers,
It’s Alex as always. Today, I’m back with my analysis of Fan Token LAZIO. If you have not read the first two parts of the series, then check them out here:
Part 1: https://alextokflow.substack.com/p/how-smart-money-influenced-lazios?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Part 2: https://alextokflow.substack.com/p/is-lazio-highly-regarded-by-sharks?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

In the previous articles, I showed you the portraits of Smart Money and Shark-Whales, the two subjects that have the greatest influence on the price of a token. In fact, these subjects have a lot of risk factors that affect the token price. Taking the profit/loss ratio of each wallet cluster for example.



This is the interface of the Profit/Loss Average feature of TokFlow AI. The bar chart on the left demonstrates the percentage of the number of wallets with profit/loss in the cluster, while the chart on the right shows the profit/loss period of each wallet cluster in real time.
It is evident that Smart Money was greatly profitable from September 14 to October 10. Currently, it witnesses a slight loss and the ratio of the number of Smart Money wallets in profit and at loss is equal at 50%.
Dev & Funds is losing and holding tokens. I don't see any signs of dumping from this wallet cluster.
Sharks-Whales and Retail Investors both showed evidence of modest profits in September, but the majority was in deficit. It seems that these two subjects are buying high. It is common knowledge that if the price spikes, there is a great possibility that they will sell out. However, to be absolutely certain, we have to see how many tokens the subjects are holding.

Now let’s go to the Holder Tracking dashboard:
 


It can be seen that Smart Money, Sharks-Whales and Retail Investors do not hold too many LAZIO tokens, so the dumping possibility of these wallets is not high. I suppose that in the coming time, the LAZIO price will have a much lower adjustment. It will be the time when Sharks-Whales and MM accumulate rapidly, then the price can rise again.
Dev & Funds wallet is currently holding a lot of tokens in smart contracts. However, as I check, they are locked and not released. And 13% of “OTHER” needs to be checked on bscscan.com.



After checking bscscan.com, it turns out that 84% of the tokens are locked in the smart contract, the last time it was unlocked was 34 days ago. In addition, I also noticed that the amount of tokens circulating on the DEX is very small, most of the tokens are circulating on Binance (the rest are locked in the contract).
So I can come to a conclusion that the MM team mostly focuses on pushing the price on Binance, but it’s obvious that Smart Money on DEX is still very profitable. This proves that we can follow Smart Money through TokFlow (tracking all on-chain data) to make investment decisions because we are actually unable to track all data on Binance.



We can see that in the rising price phase, Smart Money is the subject that gained a lot of profit especially when the market hit its peak, which means, at the highest price stage, Smart Money made a lot of take-profit orders while the rest made very little.
Before making an investment decision, I think besides in-depth study of important indicators of strong cash flows, and Profit/Loss of each subject, investors should not ignore some  other indicators to evaluate a project.

Let's take a look at LAZIO's trading volume:



The Chart Volume displays the volume of transactions on the DEX. Usually, this information is missing or incorrectly aggregated on Coingecko or CoinMarketcap, so the TokFlow team has summed it all up in the Volume Tracking feature. It is noteworthy that Lazio has very few bots in transactions as well as fake volume.



Comparing October 13 and October 18, we see that there were a lot of tokens transferred to Binance. A closer inspection reveals that the token was heavily transferred to Binance Hot Wallet 6 and Binance Hot Wallet 20.



One more indicator about Long-term and Short-term Holder shows that Long-term holders are holding 118k $LAZIO, accounting for 0.3% of total supply which is relatively negligible.

So going through 3 articles about $LAZIO with detailed tracking of on-chain data, Alex can draw several inferences: LAZIO Fan Token is a trending project that is still being nurtured by developers without too much promotion since most of the tokens are still being locked by Dev. Therefore, the number of Sharks-Whales, or Retail Investors participating in the project is still limited with a lack of investment. However, in the context of the upcoming 2023 World Cup, this is still a quite potential token with a likelihood of an increase in price in the near future. And before that time, it is possible that there will be a price adjustment to clear the way for the investors to accumulate more tokens.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is solely the author’s opinion and not investment advice. To conduct an in-depth research into the on-chain indicators of LAZIO or other tokens that you are interested in, you can use TokFlow AI - a robust tool that Alex and the TokFlow team brought to the community.

And as usual, if you have anything to share, please let Alex know in the comments!

5
3. Handling of community crisis in post-dump phase
I know that, up to now, RACA has been quite successful as the rest of the community of the project is still having a lot of faith in the #DevelopmentTeam , with the belief that this is just a stage of technology adjustment and upgradation, and one day they will reclaim.

But just wait and see ‘cause who knows. The keyword that TokFlow and I want to show you here is "faith." The simplest way for a pump project to handle a community crisis when the tokens are divided too many times is to give the community conviction. By various methods, the developers won't let the project die suddenly. On the one hand, market makers will gut the project slowly, making the project more and more dumped. On the other hand, the marketing department continues to appease the community, creates things for the community to see the relentless efforts of the Dev team, and the project is still constantly developing. Well, that's exactly what Radio CACA has been doing and continues to do.

In the previous section, I used TokFlow AI to analyze how MM and Dev dumped the tokens, and in terms of communication, immediately after reaching the ATH level, the inevitable consequence of a series of pump orders is that the RACA price is constantly falling and has divided 10 in just over 1 month to only 0.00185 (December 12, 2021). The community panicked, and lost their faith. At this time, the developers tried to appease the community by holding a round 2 MPB sale on RacaNFT on November 19 and ended in less than 2 minutes. This indicates that the community is so optimistic that they see it as an opportunity to buy the dip. RACA manipulates the community trust with a series of news that offers hope:
+ Burn 10 billion RACA in December
+ GiveAway more than 100k RACA for holders
+ Continue to release USM Land Mystery Boxes (sold out in 3 minutes and 45 seconds).

The token price was pushed back to 0.0047 on December 23, 2021, and dropped continuously for the next month to 0.0018 until January 22, 2022.
I suppose, at this time, the dump phase of the developers is almost complete. However, the game of cat and mouse is not over. RACA continued to perform Pump and Dump on the tokens for the next 2 months to maintain trust in the community and "suck the blood" as much as possible.

In late January and early February 2022, RACA's media buzzed with news:
+ 30/1/2022: The Blockchain Association of the University of Cambridge partnered with Radio Caca (RACA) to build education in the Metaverse world "Metaverse + Education", Empowering Education Reform, Promoting Educational Equality.
+ 3/2/2022: The transaction fee on the NFT market was reduced to 3%.
+ 6/2/2022: 📢 Turkey 🇹🇷 Government 🏛 announced it is actively looking into the Metaverse. At the same time, the MOST widely-distributed and famous local press & newspapers 📰 in Turkey are highlighting all great things about #RACA @USMverse

The RACA price at this time increased continuously to 0.0025. Then, it was slowly dumped to 0.001.
On March 28, 2022, the developers announced an airdrop of 680 million RACA market fees for all MPBs. This served as the last gift that market makers gave to the loyal communities at 0.0027 before the price continued to divide 9 more times until now.

Currently, the price is traded in the range of 0.0003-0.0004. Market makers continue to show their efforts to fix and improve the project's mechanism, while communities whose assets have been divided several times are still holding on to hope that one day the project will thrive again. I've noticed that there are still signs of Dev, MM or sharks collecting tokens in recent times.

This is part of the list of new wallets continuing to collect tokens, which is compiled by TokFlow. You can double-check the transactions on the BSC Chain. I don't know if this is good news for those who are still hoping for a rebound or it’s the doubt that RACA developers just quietly manipulate the market and will once again steer the RACA boat out to sea for some more fish?
I'm going to give this answer to the traders, but for me Alex and the TokFlow team - every trick can be exposed!
Want to analyze hot tokens? Let’s join our TokFlow Community to make your suggestions! We’re glad to be able to help you!

6
The End of the Pump Phase and Communication Handling

Hi guys, it's Alex from TokFlow again! In the previous section, I analyzed the RACA's steps to pump the prices and how market makers manipulated the community with media tricks. In part 2, I'm going to shed light on the end of the whole pump phase with a lot of striking evidence and most importantly how Radio CACA handled the media in the post-pump phase from the beginning of this year till now. After going sideways for about 2 weeks at the price of 0.003-0.004, the #DevelopmentTeam  rapidly set RACA price at an unexpected ATH level.

1. To the moon
On November 8, RACA proclaimed it would develop the Cyber Security Training Centre inside USM, an office located near SpaceX's headquarters. Besides, RACA also organized the airdrop program of 300 eggs and 10,000 DAU Milestone – an extremely valuable gift on the occasion of the project announcing a series of fascinating information. The community became so thrilled that the number of people joining the project had shot up. The developers continued to pamper the "contentment" of the community by announcing the burning of 300 million RACA and another 200 million RACA airdrops to all MPB owners on the same day (November 12, 2021).

Two days later (November 14, 2021), RACA price successfully reached ATH at 0.0119888 in the tremendous excitement beyond suspicion of the community. Do you still remember the lowest price of RACA just about 7 months ago? Within more than half a year, developers had successfully pumped the price of a low cap coin 630 times higher.

2. A mass of evidence that MM pumped and dumped token
Some may wonder that RACA has developed comprehensively in terms of both marketing and project, so the sharp increase in RACA prices is entirely driven by the power of the community without deliberate manipulation? Our TokFlow team has developed an AI that tracks hundreds of MM wallet labels with total transactions worth tens of billions of RACA, and here is the proof:


(Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel)

This is a small portion of MM wallet labels that we collected, as you can see, the above wallets all hold a substantial token volume that can completely manipulate the market. Throughout the entire pump phase, MM wallets are constantly buying in large quantities of RACA and selling very small quantities, with a view to pushing up the prices and simultaneously taking advantage of these MM wallets to fake market volume by buying and selling at the same time a very large number of tokens.

I really take my hat off to the marketing and project development strategies of Radio CACA's team. A perfect plan without a bit of a loophole or suspicion from the community, and the ATH price (0.0119888) that the developers chose to fake is also a pretty nice number to make them satisfied and move on to the next phase - Dump.

The question is how they pumped the token without shocking the market, or making the community criticize and boycott the project when using a lot of big names to PR for it. In fact, those wise whales and market makers never wait for a spike in price to start pumping. Instead, they gradually dumped while pumping the price without making the community notice.

I'll take the example of a wallet address with suspicious performance which is called wallet A: 0x9e8451158086ba066d93c11d8d4b6e1969bcbc8d:


(Synthetic data by TokFlow AI)

According to TokFlow analytics, wallet A received money from Dev on September 7, 2021. Therefore, I suspect this is a wallet label controlled by the Dev team.
To clarify this, I also checked the source of the wallet label 0xc99e4e934f1ddd2e3e03ffe38fe862ab5d6139be transferred to wallet A on August 24, 2021. Not surprisingly, it turned out that the amount of RACA also came from Dev, then it was broken down and transferred to a lot of other wallets.

So after receiving token from 2 sources of Dev, wallet A held the token until mid-October and began to make a lot of orders transferring the token.

I will randomly view a transaction of wallet A transferred 200K RACA to the wallet 0x241ab55768da608196f4cd2d63f5dbc07415b1a2 on October 7, 2021 to see the real purpose of this transaction. Here's what I found:


(Synthetic data by TokFlow AI)

From this I came to the conclusion: wallet A received a large number of tokens from Dev's sources then made a lot of orders transferring money to other sub-wallets to place the sell-off orders, which shows a fairly obvious dump behavior of the developers.

During the tracing process, the TokFlow team tracked down how the developers erased the trace of the token’s origin by pushing the token to the exchange, then transferring the token to another wallet address that "only God knows" whether it was a real user wallet or Dev wallet. But nothing can cover the eyes of the community or TokFlow AI, I will give you an example of another wallet label:
(0xe4850258b8699bbd7b1cb337b6023c6b979e5808)


(Synthetic data by TokFlow AI)

The aforementioned is a regular wallet label, but could it receive tokens simultaneously from both exchange and Dev? This is the proof that the Dev team could transfer money to the exchange, and then wipe out the trace by transferring to another wallet and transferring a few rounds to many other wallet labels to dump. My team - TokFlow has counted hundreds of wallets with similar transactions which indicate that the number of tokens dumped to the community was not negligible at all (in particular, these wallets showed signs of dump when the project had good news). In addition, it is also easy to notice the behavior of Dev breaking down the tokens into wallets and staking for rewards.

I just showed you how Dev dumped the tokens. However, the number of tokens in Dev wallets is only a small portion. When I learned that Devs could erase traces by pushing tokens to the exchange and then withdrawing from other wallets, I had my TokFlow team review all the wallets receiving money from the exchange and dumping continuously from the moment the price started to be pumped sharply from the end of October to the end of December. Here's part of what TokFlow found:


(Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel)

All of the above wallets show suspicious signs of receiving billions of RACA from the exchange and then selling in equal amounts. I will check for you wallets that have dumped more than 7.5 billion RACA.

Take a look at some of the highlights from this wallet address 0x431731d312dffa688a37d81af8874a58776eacfd as follows:
- The wallet had a total of 32865 transactions since 24/09/2021 (when the project had boosted pricing for more than 1 month) until now. The wallet had the most transactions at the end of October until mid-November 2021 (when the project consecutively reached new peaks)
- The wallet received the total number of 8,934,803,024 RACA from the exchanges, sold 7,509,388,951 RACA, the remaining number of 1,425,414,073 RACA was transferred to other wallets, the current number of tokens in the wallet was zero.
- The total transaction of the wallet includes:
+ Source of tokens in: 2 exchanges (PancakeSwap and Gate.io) or some other wallet addresses such as: 0x98e8f871d814bfc5506b6cd4abeb3d05f809f8c5 (the source of money from this wallet address also came from the above 2 exchanges)
+ Source of tokens out: in 2 ways: either sold right on PancakeSwap, or transferred to some wallet address, e.g.
=> 0xb023d7f5aabd97b41b367a74c8e09cfa34a97702
=> 0x972c69d9d0af1bc888fee3efa15753f531046710
=> 0x39bd1ae0c8f3387905684913dc84f34e18a1654a

So where will the tokens received from the above wallet addresses go?

=> As such, they continued to be pushed onto Gate.io or Mexc.com exchanges. And as analyzed above, this is a form of token erasure used by developers or market makers to make MM wallets up as regular user wallets that blinds the community. And with just one wallet label, the market makers have successfully dumped nearly tens of billions of tokens, so with the list of hundreds of wallets we found, the number is truly mind-boggling.

7
Hi everyone, I'm Alex from TokFlow, an organization in the financial sector that has a strategic role as private advisor and auditor for major companies and investors. Recently, I have been researching a relatively massive project - Radio CACA. This is a project that became popular by the end of 2021 and attracted tremendous attention in the NFT space. The RACA token already has nearly 20 million followers on CoinMarketCap, while the Twitter channel has reached 572k followers, which are  impressive numbers for a low cap coin.

However, in the process of researching and tracing the details, I discovered that the entire data of the project had been over-hyped and fabricated in a very sophisticated and blatant way. Millions of users have been led by the nose without even knowing it.

So how was the community misled by the #DevelopmentTeam ?

 1. Testing and Collecting Phase (May to mid-August 2021)
Let's rewind the time on May 16, 2021. When the price was at 0.000019, it suddenly increased to 0.000195 (10 times). At the same time, Radio CACA announced the launch of the RACA V1 project and drew the attention of the community by spreading the news that the media representative is Elon Musk's mother - Mrs. Maye Musk. Unexpectedly, the price was pushed back to 0.000016 just two days later.

Also in May, there were two times when Raca prices were boosted abnormally.
  • 0.00007 with the news that the RACA token was listed on MEXC Global exchange on May 20.
  • 0.00005 with the announcement that NFT "The Dancing Koda" was listed on the BakerySwap exchange on May 26.
And then it was down again and only went sideways around the price zone of 0.00002 for more than 2 months.



I consider the pricing events in May as a stepping stone for the developers to probe the community's reaction to the media news, while at the same time investigating and ensuring that the market has been completely manipulated in hand, and being well-prepared for the real fight to come.

(Note: Koda, a four-legged robotic dog, is one of the world's first decentralized AI robot dog projects, with optional features for data stored on the IPFS/Filecoin Network.
"Dancing Koda" NFT is the perfect performance for Koda's agility.
This NFT will be listed  through Radio Caca and Raca tokens are the only means of bidding.)


2.Manipulating the Market and Media
The RACA’s pump plan has really taken place since mid-August.
In less than one week from 16-21/08/2021, the price continuously increased and set a new peak on August 21, 2021, with the highest price being 0.00048868.

What has RACA done at this time to manipulate the market and legitimize the spike in prices?

On August 17, 2021, the developers announced a Metaverse discussion with CZ & Maye Musk. RACA developers were really sharp to take advantage of the prevailing Metaverse trend, and the visual effects of two prominent KOLs in the world, CZ and Maye Musk, which made the project almost go viral. Moreover, RACA is constantly releasing information:
  • On August 18, the RACA V2 token was first introduced that enabled users to swap RACA V1 into V2, along with the burning of 50 billion V1, the remaining supply was put into the V2 liquidity group
  • 20/08/2021: RACA token was listed on CoinGecko.
  • 21/08/2021: RACA token was listed on CoinMarketCap.


Radio CACA has successfully blinded the community with a series of beneficial news, clearly gaining the reputation in the community in terms of both media and product.

In order to manipulate the market, Raca's trading volume data was also blatantly faked, increasing the credibility with the legalization community for the unexpectedly high token price. Specifically:
  • On August 20, data aggregated on BSC Chain showed that the transaction volume reached $44,052,912, but the actual trading volume was only $29,647,125 => the fake transaction volume amounted to $14,405,787.
  • On August 21, data aggregated on BSC Chain showed that the transaction volume reached $36,138,572, but the actual trading volume was only $27,532,908 => the fake transaction volume amounted to $8,605,664.

I'm going to give you an analysis of statistics on a small portion of RACA's fake trading volume only in August - when the project was promoting the pump phase:



(Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel)

You'll ask me: how can RACA fake such a huge trading volume, and what evidence shows that the volume is fake?
Now, I'll show you evidence of bot wallets that was built up by the professional #DevelopmentTeam  of the project specializing in faking the trading volume during the pricing process:



(Synthetic data by TokFlow AI)

This is an example of a bot’s wallet address (0x597fa8fc25a1d74f50d86c02e86accd225e8908a) with more than 1800 transactions instantly purchased and sold at a large number of tokens. Details of a fake transaction volume on PancakeSwap: use BNB to buy RACA, immediately sell RACA to BNB in equal quantities:




(Synthetic data by TokFlow AI)

Without a doubt, this isn't the only wallet address faking volume, my team has aggregated more than 400 bot wallet addresses with hundreds of thousands of similar transactions to defraud the community throughout the time, and certainly the number just doesn't stop there. You can verify the information yourself through some of the following wallets:



(Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel)

It can be said that, by all means of fooling the community, the developers have successfully pumped the price of RACA 250 times higher than the lowest price in just 3 months. It's a really impressive number for any trader who has been lucky enough to invest in RACA since May. However, the game has only just begun. Market makers are well prepared to play with the community in an FOMO war about price continuously for 3 months from mid-August to mid-November.

 3. The Pump Scheme and Money-Making Tools
On August 24, 2021, RACA announced the participation of CZ and Maye Musk in the Binance Metaverse Panel (August 26), bringing the RACA price to set a new peak at 0.0009 and then immediately adjusting to 0.0004 and going sideways at this point until the end of September.
The price only slightly recovered to 0.00069 on September 7, 2021 when RACA announced that Justin Sun was with Maye Musk at The Sovereign Robot Dog's Avatar in Metaverse conference.

It can be affirmed that a lot of prestigious names in the industry have been revealed for the sake of the scam, in order to establish credibility and put on the perfect cover for developers to help RACA prices continuously set up new ATH.

If it’s all about pumping token prices using the media and famous KOLs, the project will definitely be nowhere near as a petty scam. However, the Radio CACA #DevelopmentTeam  has created an entire ecosystem as a token support tool and enticed the community to make huge profits.

First of all, it is crucial to mention the Metamon game project launched in early October 2021. This is a play-to-earn mini game on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). After more than 10 days, the #DevelopmentTeam  continued to release Metamon Beta 2.0 and burned 1 billion Raca after just one day of the game's release. This is a very easy game to play, but the initial investment is quite large (4000-5000 USD for the cheapest Metamon N). The community at that time had become excited by the strong development of Radio CACA and it is not difficult to understand that the price of RACA has skyrocketed and set a new peak at 0.00271 (October 10, 2021).

Along with Metamon, RACA also owns a number of large projects on BSC such as USM Metaverse, The United States of Mars. Notably, the project launched the Maye Musk Mystery Box (MPB) – the first and only mysterious NFTs boxes belonging to the "MUSK" boxes – in the top 4 NFT brands. There was a time that the NFT hit $73,000, while it initially cost only about $200.

Radio CACA also demonstrates its "generosity" to the community by constantly offering airdrop programs to MPB owners with hundreds of millions of dollars. More importantly, it is interesting to note that Elon Musk collaborated with Radio Caca to airdrop for the holder of RACA NFT and trust the project. MPB NFT holders have the opportunity to receive 100 CyberTruck cars in real life released by the Tesla company for the partnership with the Radio Caca NFT project. So far, only one person has been lucky enough to own this car.

All of Radio CACA's marketing, community-oriented strategies over the course of more than 2 months have successfully legitimized the RACA price that climbed to a new peak of 0.0039 by the end of October and sustained sideways at around 0.003-0.004 in the first week of November, getting prepared for the developers' final pumping campaign.



[To be continued…]

Pages: [1]
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod