Is it Fair or Unjust?

[MUGNIA]

fair, not fair actually back to each individual, why because we make the choice to join, if you feel that you are not commensurate with the final result, yes you can leave the bounty, without having to sue a BM by considering a larger allocation, maybe the allocation is already stipulated  from the dev's side

[ShadowCrypto]

It's not fair, but we can't do anything, if you think it's not suited for you, don't join, sadly this is how it works.

[Senin]

First I heard about this project from the Telegram Bounty Group Detectiv I thought the prize allocation was 5000 BNB.  But I was wrong because the truth was BNB worth $ 5000.  And in my opinion, it is very small, especially since Detectiv's Bounty has a large community, every Bounty managed by it must have many participants.

If you might have noticed, this is not an ICO at all, there is no advertisement for a new project and a new token. On his own initiative, the bounty detective distributes to bounty hunters Binance exchange tokens, which have a high price and high popularity among participants in the cryptocurrency market. Moreover, they did the right thing by limiting the number of participants in bounty campaigns. I would also try to join if I had the opportunity. However, I'm involved in another signature campaign.

[gunhell16]

In the first place, thanks to all who gave their side and opinion on this topic that I created, this topic was not made to insult Bounty detective neither I am against it of course not! I am just stating the fact, that the allocation literally for the bounty pool was really too small for each participant who will join with it compared to the task they need to comply, in short, the effort is not worth for the rewards they will receive since it came from the pocket itself of the bounty detective management. I hope you get my point and I respect your side also since We are in the forum where we can express our own opinion here. But anyway thanks again to everyone.

[Rakin343]

Fair because bounty detective gives budget from their own fund.

[Crypto Guard]

In my opinion, if indeed limiting the number of participants to take part in the bounty is legal. However, as much as possible to be fair is to limit who quickly he can. Don't even limit or require a high rank to be accepted. Because it's not fair for those who have registered first but low rank.

[Fenix]

For regular ICO bounty campaigns, such a small pool would most likely be unfair. However, in this case, the ICO is not carried out. Here, we can say, a separate action is being held, which is dedicated to a specific event. Bounty detectives are holding their event and it is very commendable. In my eyes, their authority has only grown because of this.

[ayatoslaw]

If based on other campaigns the bounty you mentioned is unfair, because normally someone with a high rank will be paid 120 usd in one month,
but because the number of campaigns now does not match the number of bounty hunters, which causes bounty hunters to be forced to join the campaign even though the prize allocation is small.

[KKH84]

Fairly speaking and not about a $ 5000 bounty limiting the number of participants.  In my opinion this is reasonable because the bounty manager indirectly thinks of the participants who take part in the bounty, try to imagine if the participants are not limited by a small bounty allocation, it will be very disappointing if the bounty has been completed and the prizes received are not proportional to the time they spend.

[Absolutep]

I will say it is unfair because the announcement is coming late, it should have been there right from the beginning of the campaign. I feel many would have join other campaign instead of raising their hope high for the campaign. May be the manager should always have a concrete agreement with dev and team before announcing a campaign.

[hushpupppy]

I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?

Bounty hunting this days is not about what it is worth; but a reality of what it is all about. 5000$ definitely looks small, but when you consider that signature and twitter campaigns are capped then you see that you do not have to worry much. Just do your bits or avoid thhe bounty.

[Fenix]

A few years ago, the reward pool in bounty companies was hundreds of thousands of dollars, and this was practically the norm. It was also easier for participants in this and other similar forums because at first there were no bounty campaigns on social networks, but only signature campaigns. The influx of such a mass of participants who were ready to advertise crypto projects on social networks for much less reward has led to the current poor earnings for bounty hunters. I don't like it either, but there's nothing you can do about it. Sometimes I refuse to participate in signature campaigns and other campaigns due to a too small pool. Especially if the projects look suspicious.