Linked Wallets Detected 2

[hugeblack]

Why don't you think and try to learn the dialect of each country, English is not native to their country and use a translator.The post results will look the same.

Google Translate or any translation is your words and translation algorithm, your writing style is unique and therefore the translation will be unique. We can continue this argument, but you will still say that these are assumptions.


If you really want to prove that these accounts are not your alt accounts, you must do the following:

1) Proof that there is more than one person: You said it was gas fees^[1], and therefore there must have been a discussion between you and that account at that time, and here it is either:
  - Discussion took place via the forum or PM. You can send report that messages to the admin or give a trusted account access to your account to review PMs.
 - Discussion took place outside the forum: Here you can provide a screenshot, but it will be more difficult to prove.

2) Proving that there is something different in the account: such as posting in a different local board or any board, for example, I do not post in gambling, or you do not post in tech board, and so on.

3) Be cooperative and respond to members’ inquiries: We have nothing against you, and if it is proven that these accounts are not alt accounts, we will be happy, but if you are not cooperative, most likely no one will be interested in trying to prove or deny the connection between the accounts.

[1]

Didn't you see that transaction 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 only transferred the gas fee. Yes, at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked a friend to lend us the gas fee.
And in our community that's normal.

[anshor1]

Hi...grammarian and terminology expert,
I already said we are one community in the real world, please read my post slowly.
We are in the same area and often together.
Do we have to take a photo together to show our togetherness?? 
No..We will not provide this to protect our privacy.

Who are you ?
Let the judge decide this?
If one community is deemed wrong and multifaceted, we will leave this forum along with other friends.
I'm just asking for our rights,
Are there any rules that don't allow us to exchange gas fees and carry out transactions in the real world among communities using wallets on this forum?
Please judge us...
But we can only be judged and considered wrong if there are rules governing that.
Are there any rules?

[notblox1]

No..We will not provide this to protect our privacy.

You can enjoy your privacy but than you are a cheater community family

[anshor1]

No..We will not provide this to protect our privacy.

You can enjoy your privacy but than you are a cheater community family

what do you mean, dude?
Are you who decides a cheater or not?
Are you the judge?? 
or the owner of this forum ?
Do you have the authority to claim it ?
 
Admin and senators are discussing and voting on this.
You have assumed and have decided that our community is a cheater.

[notblox1]

Are you who decides a cheater or not?
Are you the judge?? 
or the owner of this forum ?
Do you have the authority to claim it ?

Yes.

[Lauda Reborn]

Are you who decides a cheater or not?
Are you the judge?? 
or the owner of this forum ?
Do you have the authority to claim it ?

Yes.

This is untrue. You deceive people.
Owner of this forum: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1
Judges: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=5616, https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=33725

They are the people who have the authority. You?? 

[examplens]

what do you mean, dude?
Are you who decides a cheater or not?
Are you the judge?? 
or the owner of this forum ?
Do you have the authority to claim it ?
 
Admin and senators are discussing and voting on this.
You have assumed and have decided that our community is a cheater.

Whoever he is, with or without a title, has the right to express his opinion. More opinions will make the decision easier for those who need to make it. You don't need to be nervous.

I partially looked at everything presented here, and I think that sending coins/tokens between members should not be strictly punishable nor 100% proof that alt accounts are involved. Of course, unless it is frequent and organized.
Even if it is the same person behind these exposed accounts, I do not see a serious violation of the "one account-one campaign" rule. All accounts are in different campaigns, or maybe I overlooked something.

I assume that the admin and those who decide have more insight and can assert the connection of these accounts with more certainty.


@anshor1 It is wrong for you to create new accounts to add neutrality to this discussion, attacking those who criticize you. It just makes the overall picture of your case worse.

This is untrue. You deceive people.
Owner of this forum: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1
Judges: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=5616, https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=33725

They are the people who have the authority. You?? 

[Jokers]

Even if it is the same person behind these exposed accounts, I do not see a serious violation of the "one account-one campaign" rule. All accounts are in different campaigns, or maybe I overlooked something.

Don't forget that AltcoinsTalks doesn't allow to use multiple undeclared accounts, especially if they participate in any campaigns or contests or anything like that. Even if they participate in different campaigns. On our forum several undeclared accounts is a violation by itself. There can probably be turned a blind eye to this if this is made to represent some project (as the only aim) or not used for any dubious purpose and for campaign participation, but this case is of a different kind.

[anshor1]

I partially looked at everything presented here, and I think that sending coins/tokens between members should not be strictly punishable nor 100% proof that alt accounts are involved. Of course, unless it is frequent and organized.
Even if it is the same person behind these exposed accounts, I do not see a serious violation of the "one account-one campaign" rule. All accounts are in different campaigns, or maybe I overlooked something.

I assume that the admin and those who decide have more insight and can assert the connection of these accounts with more certainty.

Your logic is correct, because the only transaction is a gas fee and at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked for help from the community.
And transactions are not carried out frequently, it is not strong proof.

We did that because we didn't know that gas fee transactions and buying and selling between members were prohibited.
Because there are no rules in this forum yet.
If there were rules that prohibited it, our community would not do it.

And as I have explained above, I am only asking about my rights, where the exchange of gas fees and transactions between members is prohibited on this forum.

I asked if there were any rules, because someone would be considered wrong if there were already rules.
That is the law that applies in all countries.

If I and my community are decided wrong after seeing the clear basis of the rules, I and my community will leave this forum back to the old forum.

@anshor1 It is wrong for you to create new accounts to add neutrality to this discussion, attacking those who criticize you. It just makes the overall picture of your case worse.

Lauda reborn is not me and I didn't create it.  I don't know who he/she is at all.

[examplens]

Your logic is correct, because the only transaction is a gas fee and at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked for help from the community.

Honestly, this excuse does not seem convincing to me, and it is completely unclear why you only sent gas fees to each other at a time when the same gas fee was too high.

Lauda reborn is not me and I didn't create it.  I don't know who he/she is at all.

A newly created account that, with its first post, defends you with a very similar way of writing.
At the same time, it is not a beginner on this forum because it shows good knowledge of forum rules and also it leaves a specific reference link, which many forum users do not even know about.
The chances of such a coincidence are zero, plus this whole discussion is about you managing several accounts.

[notblox1]

@anshor1 It is wrong for you to create new accounts to add neutrality to this discussion, attacking those who criticize you. It just makes the overall picture of your case worse.

This is not his new account, this is another of his family community members that is distant relative of Lauda.

A newly created account that, with its first post, defends you with a very similar way of writing.
At the same time, it is not a beginner on this forum because it shows good knowledge of forum rules and also it leaves a specific reference link, which many forum users do not even know about.
The chances of such a coincidence are zero, plus this whole discussion is about you managing several accounts.

He didnt defend him, he only defended family attacked by word YES.
We are lucky to have such new valuable family members.

[hugeblack]

Honestly, this excuse does not seem convincing to me, and it is completely unclear why you only sent gas fees to each other at a time when the same gas fee was too high.

I told him the correct way he can help defend himself, which is as follows

1) Proof that there is more than one person: You said it was gas fees[1], and therefore there must have been a discussion between you and that account at that time, and here it is either:
  - Discussion took place via the forum or PM. You can send report that messages to the admin or give a trusted account access to your account to review PMs.
 - Discussion took place outside the forum: Here you can provide a screenshot, but it will be more difficult to prove.

Does anyone know why there is a red dot next to the account? I noticed this for most of the accounts revealed in this section.

[Jokers]

Does anyone know why there is a red dot next to the account? I noticed this for most of the accounts revealed in this section.

This is a mark of a new group "zoom 1". admin said he will explain more later.

Distribution done,

..

- Users will red dot were skipped (the reason will be addressed later)

Looks like this mark can be tied with ongoing investigations or something like that, but it is just my guess, I don't know exactly.

[damsix]

1) Proof that there is more than one person: You said it was gas fees[1], and therefore there must have been a discussion between you and that account at that time, and here it is either:
  - Discussion took place via the forum or PM. You can send report that messages to the admin or give a trusted account access to your account to review PMs.
 - Discussion took place outside the forum: Here you can provide a screenshot, but it will be more difficult to prove.

Does anyone know why there is a red dot next to the account? I noticed this for most of the accounts revealed in this section.

Yeps, I'm one of the ones here who got a red circle on my account and that's a badge that can be said to be "misbehaving" if you refer to this Thread 

And if I have to prove the transaction gas fees you mentioned in the "quote", I can't because I'm discussing it in my own house with my wife, mother, uncle and two nephews.
If I have to prove other than using screenshots of conversations, do my wife, mother, uncle and two nephews and I have to take a photo together side by side to prove that we are real humans who have been present on altcoinstalks since 2018??

Does anyone know why there is a red dot next to the account? I noticed this for most of the accounts revealed in this section.

This is a mark of a new group "zoom 1". admin said he will explain more later.

Hi mate, I have explained it above, please read it in detail and that is proof that the Thread  was created by a "dragoncrypto" member.

Looks like this mark can be tied with ongoing investigations or something like that, but it is just my guess, I don't know exactly.

Yeps, this case is currently under investigation by Admin, Judges , Bounty Managers and Senators because this case is very complex so it takes a lot of time to provide the best solution because as I said before, altcoinstalks is a friendly forum.

[Jokers]

Yeps, I'm one of the ones here who got a red circle on my account and that's a badge that can be said to be "misbehaving" if you refer to this Thread 

...

Hi mate, I have explained it above, please read it in detail and that is proof that the Thread  was created by a "dragoncrypto" member.

It's not a misbehaving badge, it's a new badge for "zoom 1" group. When dragononcrypto wrote his topic there was no "zoom 1" group yet, so he couldn't explain it then. This is what I know. I'm not sure what belonging to this group means, so will be waiting for admin's clarification.