Future of Bounty Hunter If there is no interest in the ICO?

[ayatoslaw]

We must strive to survive in any place. If there will be no bounty we will find new way to work! Anyway advertisement is always needed!

What do you mean to find another way is to look for extra income outside the bounty?
because if the bounty is not there then the ad service is also not there, because it might have been shifted with something else,
like the ICO which will be displaced by the IEO.

[Bobcrypto]

As a bounty hunter, we must anticipate this. If the ICO is marginalized and there are no more projects that use bounty as a media campaign, then we must be prepared to face it. And more and more IEO will be done to sell the tokens. If there are no more hunters, they have to look for other fields to work on. But in my opinion the bounty is still needed to help the promotion, because with the increasing number of IEO competition there must still be assistance for promotion. We can see that there are several IEOs on latoken that have been postponed several times because they didn't get good sales results.

Yes, you have a point here, assuming there are no longer ICOs because IEOs has gained ground on the crypto ecosystem, it will still be very important for new start up to spreed information about their projects and at the same time, increase their project awareness and popularity.
Again, i think many projects, from time to time may further promote their projects even after successful IEOs or even ICOs, through signature campaigns and social media platforms or on the crypto communities like Altcoinstalks forum and others.

[Dodo]

I think there are still a lot of places for bounty hunters if the ICO is no longer attractive to them. One of them is the IEO. I think here the bounty hunters will be more attractive and comfortable in it. Because IEO is a little better than ICO.

[Filo]

ICOs cannot be replaced by IEOs. And there will be less successful IEOs at the end. Only important exchanges such as Binance, will be successful in this. And there are hundreds of projects. So, no worries.

[Leonardo]

ICO is an irreplaceable part of cryptocurrency. It just changes from this form to another form. Talking about IEO, when people are no longer hyped on it, traditional ICO will take its steam and become popular again. Even when IEO is on trend, there're still some good ICOs. They're just harder to be found.

[zilzylian]

ICO is an irreplaceable part of cryptocurrency. It just changes from this form to another form. Talking about IEO, when people are no longer hyped on it, traditional ICO will take its steam and become popular again. Even when IEO is on trend, there're still some good ICOs. They're just harder to be found.

yes you are right, almost every time I look at web ICO and look for a new ICO on google, I still believe there is a good and promising ICO, even new projects that easily run the IEO are not sure to get a good price in exchange for a long time.
In the end, after investors can easily buy an initial coin in crypto exchange, there will be a price decrease because there will be a high selling transaction rather than buying. Because of that I look more at the product of the new project that I follow than the price. Because if the project is good then the #DevelopmentTeam  will start marketing with the help of bounty hunters

[dragononcrypto]

As a bounty hunter, we must anticipate this. If the ICO is marginalized and there are no more projects that use bounty as a media campaign, then we must be prepared to face it. And more and more IEO will be done to sell the tokens. If there are no more hunters, they have to look for other fields to work on. But in my opinion the bounty is still needed to help the promotion, because with the increasing number of IEO competition there must still be assistance for promotion. We can see that there are several IEOs on latoken that have been postponed several times because they didn't get good sales results.

Yes, you have a point here, assuming there are no longer ICOs because IEOs has gained ground on the crypto ecosystem, it will still be very important for new start up to spreed information about their projects and at the same time, increase their project awareness and popularity.
Again, i think many projects, from time to time may further promote their projects even after successful IEOs or even ICOs, through signature campaigns and social media platforms or on the crypto communities like Altcoinstalks forum and others.

This is true, I've noticed more ICO's from 2017-2018 now using Ether as bounties which is great to see. I'm also noticing IEOs starting to have bounties without naming any names (but DYOR and find them). For me I much prefer to engage in an IEO bounty with the same bounty allocation as an ICO, and is much more likely to successfully raise funds unlike 95% of the ICOs at the moment (if not more). Not forgetting that these IEO tokens can reach exchanges at 3-5x the value 

[Anzal RK]

when everyone forgets the ICO and many say that the bounty hunter is not needed, in my opinion it's a mistake.
now the IEO is still small and the information is also easy to get, but when all projects using the IEO will definitely need bounty hunter services to promote it.
I have never been worried about this problem because I am sure the bounty hunter will always be needed.

[Leonardo]

This is true, I've noticed more ICO's from 2017-2018 now using Ether as bounties which is great to see. I'm also noticing IEOs starting to have bounties without naming any names (but DYOR and find them). For me I much prefer to engage in an IEO bounty with the same bounty allocation as an ICO, and is much more likely to successfully raise funds unlike 95% of the ICOs at the moment (if not more). Not forgetting that these IEO tokens can reach exchanges at 3-5x the value 

I've seen some IEO bounties recently but I don't highly recommend any of them. They just borrowed the IEO to cause attention and hype. I agree that engaging in an IEO bounty is much more profitable than an ICO. However, being labelled as an IEO at this time, one project gets a lot of attraction via social media. Bounty seems unnecessary.

[Fenix]

Not all teams will be able to collect funds through the exchange in the format IЕO. The exchanges select only some of the proposed projects, however, the majority will be forced to collect funds in our usual ICO format. The issue of reducing fraud over time will somehow be resolved, including government regulation. Therefore, I believe that the services of bounty hunters will still be in demand.

[tekatjaya]

we have to think about getting bounty support because in my opinion investment is very difficult without a bounty prize,
 So we must maintain the development of this bounty,
 It's better if we can make our own bounty,

[vicoma4real]

In any way and in the future, there is no way that bounty hunter services will not be needed. project will not rely only on IEO as not all exchanges will welcome all the project. They might be luck to get one or at most two, so there will be need to spread to other exchanges.

[tonymillions84]

we all know that ICO was an avenue for scammers to rob people of their hard earn money. IEO remains the next big and great thing to attract investors back to crypto and avoid weak and useless project without future. IEO all the way.

[Warung_lontong]

it's true with everything you say, that I feel that after the IEO at this time it is very influential on the development of ico, and I hope that everything can go well.

[tonymillions84]

for me personal, i will move into trading full time. in case we ran short of bounties which is also not possible because project do need marketing to get the interest of the investors. currently, i even prefer projects PLANNING to do IEO. I always check to make sure that 80% of bounties i am partaking will conduct an IEO.